Jump to content

User talk:Ohjay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ohjay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ordre Reaux Croix, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! M0RD00R (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ordre Reaux Croix

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ordre Reaux Croix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. M0RD00R (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ordre Reaux Croix

[edit]

The article Ordre Reaux Croix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable organization. Just a couple ghits and only one gbook hit which is not enough to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M0RD00R (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.doukhobor.org/Lopukhin.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on tag

[edit]

Hello, there is no need to place "hang on" tag below the proposed deletion template because it is not speedy deletion candidate now. You can just remove proposed deletion template but please provide your rationale on talk page. But I must stress that there are no realiable sources (see WP:RS) to establish notability (See WP:ORG) of the organization in question. And this means that article probably will be deleted. M0RD00R (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that you provided references, but how reliable are they? You will really need to provide more information about their publishers, authors etc. And still, google books mentions this organization only once, so I'd the future of this article does not look promising. Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin article definitely has future if written according to Wikipedia rules. Sources are there [1]. Good luck. M0RD00R (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a courtesy I have removed proposed deletion template since you are obviously objecting the deletion. You could do it by yourself of course. M0RD00R (talk) 23:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. M0RD00R (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ohjay, I have placed a copyright violation template on the page to give you more time (seven days) to rewrite the article. Many parts of the article, such as the first sentence, still need to be rewritten. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Cunard (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC) Cunard (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ordre Reaux Croix

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ordre Reaux Croix. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordre Reaux Croix. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.mobipocket.com/en/eBooks/eBookDetails.asp?BookID=178240, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ivan Vladimirovich Lopukhin saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you have replaced an article with content copied from one source with an article with content copied from another. I'm afraid that material you place on Wikipdia must be entirely in your own words, except with limited clearly marked quotations. See non-free content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ohjay&oldid=1189981379"