User talk:Ohio state buckeyes football68

Welcome!

Hello, Ohio state buckeyes football68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! TheMile (talk) 13:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The ten year war

A tag has been placed on The ten year war requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 18:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. X Marx The Spot (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio State Buckeyes baseball

A tag has been placed on Ohio State Buckeyes baseball, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SMC (talk) 23:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1960 ohio state buckeyes basketball team

A tag has been placed on 1960 ohio state buckeyes basketball team, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Guest9999 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio State Buckeyes baseball

Please refrain from removing templates from Ohio State Buckeyes baseball until the issues have been resolved. Further actions may result in a blocking. If you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 00:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Ohio State Buckeyes football. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Tool2Die4 (talk) 12:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ohio State Buckeyes football. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tool2Die4 (talk) 00:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go Buckeyes

OHIO is right, but I'm anti-playoff. Go Bucks!!!!!Bcspro (talk) 14:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why

I grew up watching the bowl games. The 1997 Rose Bowl launched my love for Ohio State football. You cannot remove the tradition from the Rose Bowl which has been around since 1902. It has been said so many times, a playoff would dilute the importance of the regular season. Many March Madness fans don’t or rarely watch the regular season, I am one of those fans. I am actually for a plus one format, but without the 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 format. Traditional tie-ins must be followed. But that’s just my opinion. Bcspro (talk) 02:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giving the Rose Bowl the NC still violates its tradition of Big Ten/Pac-10. What I would like to see is the major bowls played and then two teams selected to play a week or two later from those winners. The tradition of the Rose, Sugar, Orange Bowl etc. still intact. Bcspro (talk) 22:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reds

Correct founding date of the current team is 1882, as discussed at length in talk. Continuing to try to post 1869 constitutes vandalism. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 06:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As has been discussed at length, and as the Reds themselves acknowledge, the current club dates only to 1882. If you continue to push the 1869 year, it will continue to be treated as vandalism on your part. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 12:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 19:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to stop adding back that supposed "1919" team photo, which is plainly marked as "1909" and also looks its age. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 05:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chillicothe Paints has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 16:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Green Bay Packers constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 16:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your edit here

Would you be willing to discuss it? I prefer the fully collapsed version.--Rockfang (talk) 09:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio state buckeyes football68, you really need to discuss this with Rockfang, either here or at Talk:Green Bay Packers. Continuing to edit war over this article, as you have done here, here, here, and here, is not appropriate. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Thank you. — Satori Son 13:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Montco (talk) 01:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ohio State Buckeyes football constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. SJP (talk) 03:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Montco (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You really can use the sandbox for testing purposes; please don't make editing tests in the "main" namespace. Any reply to this message would be appreciated (see how to use a talk page or our introduction if you like). Thanks. – Luna Santin (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After more than 1,000 edits (of varying quality levels) our friend here is really past the testing stage of his WP career. In any case, I have just made another reversion of these 'test' edits. Montco (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ohio State Buckeyes football has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. SJP_Chat 18:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Why, after all this time of inproving Ohio State articles, do you feel the need to vandalize? It is getting to the point where you will be blocked if it continues. Bcspro (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I'd like to know. I've been getting close to turning this guy in to WP:ANI. It's almost like there are two different guys operating in this account - which is strictly against the rules. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 22:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I think it's about time I did. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 22:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now reported this user's peculiar activities to WP:ANI. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 22:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed

First off, my apoligies. I believe it is now fixed. Try comparing other pages to see what is different. Miami Hurricanes football of all teams cracked it for me. Happy editing. Bcspro (talk) 02:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I went to Miami Hurricanes football, they also have a National Champions box. I looked at what was different from your box and theirs. You were missing another |} at the end. Ask for help next time and explain any deletions or additions that may appear controversaial to avoid this whole mess in the future. Bcspro (talk) 17:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Eckstorm

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Eckstorm, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bucknuts.com/osuhistory/coaches.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Leave The Template:BuckeyesFootballTeams the way it is meant to be o.k. I came up with the Idea of it look at its history and I Created it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronohio (talk • contribs) 19:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

You can still Edit the Template Just don't take off the Conference championships and all of that stuff o.k. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronohio (talk • contribs) 19:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Safety

You really shouldn't be putting personal information on your user page, especially if it's true in this case. It's potentially a very serious risk. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 22:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NCAA Men's Division I Final Four appearances by school

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to NCAA Men's Division I Final Four appearances by school. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Masonpatriot (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Image:Don Hutson.jpg

Stop re-adding the above photo to Green Bay Packers. The above photo is not a free image, as can be seen on the image's description page. It cannot be used in this article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 15:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because the image is copyrighted. That means that we on Wikipedia must have a very, very good reason to be able to use it. Now our reason in the article Don Hutson is that the article is about the person in the picture, the person is dead so it would be really hard to get a free picture of him, and the photo helps the reader understand the article. It cannot be used in the Green Bay Packers article because the article is about the Packers, we could easily find another free image that could be used in its place, or not even put a picture at all because one isnt needed, and it really doesnt help the reader understand this article better. Pictures aren't just added to make things look pretty, they should help the reader understand the article, but if the image is free than we usually add it just to make things look better. If the image is not free than we cannot add it to any article we want, there must be a extremely good reason to, and there is not an extremely good reason to add it to the Packers article. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 08:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of And This One Belongs to the Reds

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article And This One Belongs to the Reds, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Goochelaar (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arizona Cardinals

I reverted your erroneous change of their founding year. 1960 is when they moved from Chicago to St. Louis, but the Cardinals are older than the NFL itself, as is well-covered in the article. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 17:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 1977 Orange Bowl

A tag has been placed on 1977 Orange Bowl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 1977 Orange Bowl

A tag has been placed on 1977 Orange Bowl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fixman_{(Praise me)} 00:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from 1977 Orange Bowl, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Waterden (talk) 00:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 1981 Liberty Bowl

A tag has been placed on 1981 Liberty Bowl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1979 Gator Bowl

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 1979 Gator Bowl, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Waterden (talk) 00:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bob White (American football)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bob White (American football), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on Talk:Bob White (American football)|its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Waterden (talk) 00:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Hi there, I noticed the article was under prod and believe I got it up to the basic acceptable level. If you have any extra information especially his DOB, jersey #, or if he went to another team after the Buckeyes please let me know. Gracias! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Albert E. Herrnstein

A tag has been placed on Albert E. Herrnstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beano (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1979 Gator Bowl

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 1979 Gator Bowl, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Billma (talk) 00:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ohio state buckeyes football68! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 49 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Gene Fekete - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dave Leggett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BuckiRetired

Template:BuckiRetired has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]