User talk:Ohgltxg

Thank you for experimenting with the page Triple Crown Champion on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- The Hybrid 19:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Titles

Stop removing the organization names from titles, they are part of the title names. TJ Spyke 02:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

It's alright, I know not everyone checks the WP:PW page. TJ Spyke 02:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to WrestleMania 23

See the guideline at WP:PW, until a wrestler is confirmed for the match they should not be added. TJ Spyke 23:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Booker T

He was the first full-blooded (for lack of a better term) African - American World Champion in WWF/E. The Rock is only half black, I think this is notable to some extent, and should be re-added but with wording suggesting that he is the first (again for lack of a better term at this point) full-blooded African - American World Champion in WWF/E. How do you suggest we word this? Because, yes, The Rock was the first black World Champion in WWF/E history, but he is also half-Samoan, so I really am not sure how to go about this. What do you think? Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 00:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I realize all that, in fact, I say above "...yes, The Rock was the first black World Champion..." my question to you was, should we mention something on King Booker's page how he is the first person who is 100% Afro-American to hold the world title? I couldn't care less either way whether we do or not, because The Rock was the first Afro-American World Champ, just wondering what you think. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 18:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Good call. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 18:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• • • • Just thought i would point out to you, that you are talkin about 2 different titles. The Rock held the WWE Heavyweight championship, Booker only held the WORLD Heavyweight championship which was created in 2002 after WWE bought WCW and they turned the WCW heavyweight title into the WORLD heavyweight title for use on smackdown. Also just HOW do you define 100% african-american? BTW not sure if you added it to his page. Was just reading this and saw the comments, so thought i would too.Rogue Gremlin 04:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
      • Yep, The Rock got there first, plus they would have to have a liniage on booker to prove he is what they say, 100% african american, just because he is of color does not make him 100% african-american. His parents could have jamacian, haitian, bohemian in them or so many more. I tagged the references on the page for a citation that he is 100% african-american as he called it. Without the citations it will be removed anyway. Thanks for tye responseRogue Gremlin 22:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
      • Also since that title is technically the WCW title renamed, Ron Simmons held the title in 1992, long before booker held it there.Rogue Gremlin 01:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

• • • • Actually , you have to remeber back. Once the WWE bought WCW, They had 2 titles in WWE the WWE heavyweight and the WCW World heavyweight and they continued using as such, in fact if you remember (Kurt Angle, The Rock, Chris Jericho and Booker T) were WCW heavyweight champ while in the WWE. Then they decided to drop the WCW from the name of the title. IT was (WCW World Heavyweight champ) now it is just (World Heavyweight champ) the other thing, try taking a look at the belt itself, it is basically the WCW belt with a name change on it. I know they say it is a different title altogether (by name) but if you only go by that, then no WWWF of WWF champ was a WWE champ. Rogue Gremlin 20:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
      • What actually happened back in 2002 if you remember was brock lesner won the undisputed title (combining both titles) when he went to smackdown, raw needed a title, so they basicaly said they were creating the World heavyweight title for RAW, all it wa however was a way to remove WCW from the titleRogue Gremlin 21:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
      • Here's is a lil more proof to some of the stuff I mention, Also if you watch wrestling all the time, you can catch the announcers making the same references to the history of the title all the time. I mean come on, it's the same title we all know it, I've been watching wrestling religiously for over 30 years, it will always be the same belt no matter what they call it http://www.answers.com/topic/world-heavyweight-championship-wwe#wp-_note-1Rogue Gremlin 21:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Matt Hardy

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from an article, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 23:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

WWE Roster

Man, if Shane and Matt are on the Raw roster just bcuz he appears on Raw, the Jeff should be on SD! too. And Mr. McMahon should be on ECW. And Bobby Lashley should be on Raw. Your logic makes no sense

What I am telling u is that Lashley appears more on Raw then Matt Hardy. And the ECW Championship has been defended more on Raw lately. So, ur argument does not follow through. If Matt wins the US title, what would u do?, put him on both??

No, you'll keep him on Smackdown, because he is contracted there.

Neither Rey Mysterio or Triple H are active yet, please wait until after this week's smackdown to add them, this is a factual site not a wrestling news site they hae not appeared on tv so remain inactive. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 10:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on World Heavyweight Championship (WWE). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Michaelas¹⁰ 23:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

IC and US title

I'm assuming that you have added the note on the IC page about holders of both to both the IC and US pages, and if you are to list US title holders then you need to distinguish under which federation the belt was when they one it, after all Flair held it under NWA while Carlito held it under WWE. Darrenhusted 00:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Chuck Palumbo

There was a discussion on the talk page of the WWE Roster that you chose not to participate in. Please stop adding Palumbo to Raw. Gavyn Sykes 03:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

TV Title

As a somewhat-knowledgeable wrestling fan, I dispute your characterization. The NWA continues to exist, and may claim that the lineage of its TV title is separate from Crockett (later WCW.) For reader convenience, it might make sense to list the various title-holders at separate articles, depending on the organization claiming the TV title at the time of their Championship reign.

As an administrator, I advise you that, even if your concerns are correct, speedy deletion is not the appropriate form to address the problem. Speedy deletion is governed by the narrow criteria for speedy deletion, and your reason fits none of those criteria. You need to refer the articles to Articles for Deletion to address your concerns. Best wishes, Xoloz 01:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Your point may not be relevant, if the NWA today seeks to promote the legitimacy of past titles in order to emphasize the richness of its history. You also failed to address the issue of convenience for the reader.

In any case, I'll leave that issue to folks with more expertise. The point of which I am absolutely certain is that speedy deletion is inappropriate in this case. You may either nominate the articles for deletion through AfD, or seek a talk page consensus to undertake redirects. Best wishes, Xoloz 02:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Whether your supposition is true depends on the terms of the sale of WCW, and the terms of WCW's agreement with the NWA. We know WWE owns the titles, and the footage library: whether they own the "history" is an academic question. I very much doubt they would bother to stipulate that such a thing in their agreement of sale, but who knows?

For instance, TNA, while under license with the NWA, promoted the Dudleys as former WCW tag champions, despite their having won the WCW titles within the WWE. "Histories" are generally publicly available, because they are too nebulous to sell as a commodity.

Anyway, this issue is likely to give me a headache if we go on. :) Take it to AfD, or to an article talk page, where you will find keen contributors eager to discuss this with you. Best wishes, Xoloz 02:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Triple Crown Championship

I wasn't sure about your removal of a paragraph here. Without an edit summary, it's difficult to separate productive edits from non-productive edits. McPhail 11:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Championship Names

Please stop changing all of the listings those wrestlers that have won the NWA World Tag Team Championship (Mid-Atlantic version) and the NWA United States Heavyweight Championship to reflect the names they more recently have used. For instance, listing Lex Luger in his article as a 5 time WCW United States Heavyweight Champion is inaccurate and is against Wikipedia policy. Four of his reigns occurred before the title's name was changed to the WCW United States Heavyweight Championship. Policy states that titles should be listed under the names that were used at the time that a certain wrestler won them.Odin's Beard 14:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

So, you want to start listing championships won even if the reign or reigns of a wrestler occurred months or even years before the title was renamed a WCW championship? That makes no sense to me whatsoever. Using that logic, your logic, all former NWA United States Champions should be listed as WWE United States Champions even if most of the wrestlers that've held it have never wrestled for World Wrestling Entertainment. But, I suggest we take this up on the WikiProject Wrestling page and discuss this because there's no sense getting into an edit war.Odin's Beard 22:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I've brought the subject to the attention of other editors on the WikiProject Professional Wrestling discussion page. In order to keep things simplified, it was decided to keep list all of the titles a wrestler won over the course of his or her career as what they were called at the time he or she won them. It adds an inconsistent element to the articles to make exceptions for certain championships. This is really an issue that's been decided a long long time ago, but feel free to make your case there. You might be able to get it changed to your way of thinking. If that's what happens, I'll gladly go along with it. However, until or unless that's what happens, you're violating the policy on championship listings as it currently stands so please leave the titles listed as they originally were until it's settled one way or the other.Odin's Beard 13:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I personally don't like the way that it looks. Even if I did though, you and I alone aren't enough to change the policy. Since I posted the issue on the WikiProject Professional Wrestling discussion page, about half a dozen or so editors have made their comments and all of them have voted to keep things the policy as it is. Retroactively renaming every NWA title that became a WCW championship doesn't make sense to them, me included. I'll give you an example. Ole and Gene Anderson were the first to win the Mid-Atlantic version of the NWA World Tag Team Championship. By doing things the way you're suggesting, that would mean listing them as WCW World Tag Team Champions a full 16 years before the title was renamed and almost 14 years before the company's name was changed to WCW. Another example would involve Bruno Sammartino. Your suggestion would mean calling him the a two time WWE Champion in the C&A section despite the fact that the company was named the WWWF at the time and that his two reigns occurred decades before both the company and title were renamed. I'm sorry, but that makes no sense to me at all. And I know you're primarily just talking about doing this to a few articles, but a policy on anything is no good if it isn't applied equally. But, as I've said, make your case on the discussion page. You might be able to convince some of them to change their views.Odin's Beard 23:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Cherry/Maryse/Extreme Expose/Triple H/Rey Mysterio

They aren't considered wrestlers, just because they are going to be in a Battle Royal, doesn't make them female wrestlers are they FULL-TIME wrestlers? No. So they aren't female wrestlers.

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, please do not put Triple H & Rey Mysterio in the active roster as they haven't even made their return. REGARDLESS WHATEVER TIME IS LEFT FOR SUMMERSLAM.

Thanks! Art 281 12:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

If you keep on adding Triple H & Rey Mysterio to the active roster & put Maryse/Cherry/Extreme Expose as "female wrestlers" I will block you.

Art 281 22:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry Man!. Didn't see that!.....Just ignore what I said :) Art 281 22:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

re:Misunderstanding

I understand you're position. I was actually refering to Nick in the edit summary, not you. No malice was on you're part, and I recognize that. Regards, — Moe ε 22:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Rasheed Lucius Creed

Going to have to disagree with you there, TNA Tag Titles should not be listed in his accomplishments until it is definitely confirmed. There have been cases in other promotions where a tag member was replaced by someone else, but the replacement/substitute was not made a champion in the process. Steven Regal replaced Brian Pillman as Austin's tag partner in a tag title match in WCW in the early 90's, but was not named Tag Team Champion in the process. British Bulldog also substituted for Owen Hart in a WWF Tag Title match against Diesel and Shawn Michaels. My point is, unless the team with the replacement partner wins, then, and only then could you really say that makes him tag champion. Also another interesting one, Randy Orton replaced Booker T in the best of 7 series with Benoit over the US Title, Orton even got the clincher in the series, but did he and Booker T become co-US champions in the process? No. I've emailed info@tnawrestling.com about it for their stance. TonyFreakinAlmeida 23:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for November 25 - December 2 is ??. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, November 11. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved! You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

Spoilers to roster (WWE)

Adding coach as the announcer is a spoiler, hence "Spoil" er, it is spoiling a non-announced event. Spoilers do not need to be matches or title changes. If you keep adding it, you will be warned and then blocked.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 22:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio

Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot (Disable) 04:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio

Thanks! --Rkitko ^(talk) 21:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)