User talk:OglebayLights

November 2020

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, OglebayBot, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

OglebayLights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

OglebayLights (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked. Happy editing! Yamla (talk) 12:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karen Gillan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karen Gillan was changed by OglebayLights (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851006 on 2020-11-14T20:25:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gwen Stefani. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gwen Stefani was changed by OglebayLights (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888472 on 2020-11-14T20:38:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karen Gillan, you may be blocked from editing. So Why 20:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 20:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. So Why 20:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OglebayLights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of ThanksgivingDinner by SoWhy, an active member of the Arbitration Committee. This account was a bot account, but was renamed to this user, OglebayLights. I would like to be unblocked from the site because it was blocked almost an hour ago. I vandalized Karen Gillan and Gwen Stefani articles from the site. I was blocked indefinitely for the username policy, then unblocked, then blocked again, this time a sockpuppet of ThanksgivingDinner. This time, 2 blocks for this user OglebayLights. I made over 10 edits and then the blocking administrator blocked you. OglebayLights, please return to editing Wikipedia. Yamla renamed this user from OglebayBot to OglebayLights. This is my user, Oglebay Lights, was registered yesterday on this site, the English Wikipedia OglebayLights (talk) 21:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request is completely incoherent to me. 331dot (talk) 21:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OglebayLights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been blocked indefinitely from editing as a sockpuppet of ThanksgivingDinner by SoWhy, a member of the Arbitration Committee OglebayLights (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 21:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

— O Still Small Voice of Clam 22:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]