User talk:Oglach na hEireann

Welcome!

Hello, Oglach na hEireann! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 13:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2020

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Harold Covington have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. SummerPhD^v2.0 12:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts for post-1932 American politics and recently deceased or living people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Troubles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——SN 54129 13:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me make this very clear about your BLP violations

We do not tolerate the sort of WP:BLP violations you have made twice (you know the second one). A third time and if I see it I'll probably topic ban you from both American politics and BLP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 13:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that one is the Bernie Sanders link. I had forgotten all about that one until I logged in. I was drunk last night. Sorry. What is the other alleged BLP violation? Oglach na hEireann (talk) 06:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Greg Sacks?Oglach na hEireann (talk) 06:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I still edit Richard Petty, who ran for North Carolina Secretary of State in 1996?Oglach na hEireann (talk) 06:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was Barack Obama. At the moment you can edit anything you like, but I strongly advise you not to edit drunk. Or to edit to make a point that's obviously not going to get consensus. Doug Weller talk 13:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to file an unblock request, please make sure to give your consent for checkusers to reveal your IP address pursuant to this section, #4, first bullet point, "With the permission of the affected user". That way, admins and editors will be able to understand why I blocked you. Note to admins: If he files an unblock request without the consent, please revoke his talkpage access. Thank you.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account is also

Confirmed to Henry Hannon blocked by ST47 and there are likely more accounts.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]