User talk:Ogabadaga

Really?

Ya think? ;)

James Gunn

Just so you know, my one comment about an individual not "dictating consensus" was intended to be directed towards User:Tromaintern, not to you. I didn't notice your edit that came after his. We have a strict policy on biographies of living people, and that editor continually insists on including contentious material about the director and his film, seemingly because he just doesn't like him. It really does need to stay out.--Cúchullain ^t/c 08:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the quote is irrelevant, it's from some magazine, interpreting what studion insiders said. The magazine's opinion doesn't matter, it's the insider's opinion that should be there, but one particular user is intent on including as much negative material as he can about this guy and this film. It's not a "direct quote", it's the definition of an "indirect quote" - it comes from a third party, trying to sum up the opinion of someone, but we include it here for some reason. I'd be interested to know exactly where you read that "a direct quote is preferred" - that's almost the same thing this user said several months ago in trying to justify his adding it. As for the James Gun article, we have a very strict BLP policy prohibiting poorly sourced contentious material. As I said before, the information is not relevant to the biography.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You've already violated the 3RR rule on the James Gunn article. Please be more careful in the future or you will be reported. Jauerback 20:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slither

Please review the first version that you reverted and the second version. It was not a clear revert but an attempt to rewrite the paragraph to reflect the film's stance at the box office more fully and more neutrally. Please see my comment on the talk page. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 01:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ogabadaga for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 07:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sockpuppetry

I am sincere, and I'm no meatpuppet. The first I heard of this minor edit war was when a RfC was left here. I wasn't planning to have the Slither article on my watchlist forever, but I will keep it for a while longer. And yes, rest assured, while watchlisted I will protect its integrity from those who would POV it the other way. Though Erik looks to be doing a good job of it so far. Liquidfinale ^{(Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ)} 18:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]