User talk:Oddsourceuser

November 2024

Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Andreas Ntoi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 13:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Khirurg (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Khirurg (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Parga shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Piccco (talk) 12:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Piccco (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bistricë (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bistricë and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 21:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oddsourceuser! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 21:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navaricë (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Navaricë and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 21:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprised

Its not even been 3 days since i opened this account and i have been banned because i accidentsly did some of my edits in incognito mode,however i dont belive that to be the reason i got banned.I have used sources for almost all of my edits and i have still had all of my edits reverted.You can try to justify these reverts as me making "pov edits" however i have used citations for almost all of my edits . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddsourceuser (talk • contribs)

This does not address the concerns raised at WP:ANI. I very strongly suggest you address those concerns immediately because if you don't, we'll just assume the concerns are justified. --Yamla (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I simply dont have a proxy,if you look at edits from 3 days ago they were made with the same ip as my current account,they were made by me.The reason as to why i sometimes used the ip for edits is because some of them were made from my laptop,hell i didnt even know what a proxy until i had to search it up after i couldnt edit a page Oddsourceuser (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please reread Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_behaviour. Your edits made with your IP address are only a small secondary issue here. You need to address the larger concerns. --Yamla (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt notice those,however i will try to address everything

1.Pov edits:Many of my "pov" edits were wronfully marked as such,and most of these edits i fixed in later edits.Not to mention some of them were just poorly phrased and sounded like pov edits

2.Unwilling to talk:I was not aware if you or the other messages were a bot or not and not to mention i have been very busy as of lately,i did notice that you sent me a warning but i didnt know that it would immediatly lead to a block.

3.The edit war: The pages i edited you already mentioned,however in the pages of agia,himara(town),himara and a few others i didnt really do anything wrongly.In the other pages i either spoke unformaly or derived to much from the source,however it wouldnt be hard for the guy i was having a edit war with to simply change or cut out the pov parts,not revert all my edits.

Anyways i do apologise for my behaviour as i initally thought the ip block was for something else Oddsourceuser (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also some of the edits that were pov edits i tried to fix Oddsourceuser (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oddsourceuser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not been banned for something reasonable and i have also had my edits taken down for fake reasons

Decline reason:

This account is neither banned nor blocked. Please disable your proxy. Note that you may need to wait a full 24 hours after doing so, in order for the proxy block to clear. Yamla (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

About Draft:Bistricë

Please add the page number of the page documenting what you write. I would like to verify it - thank you very much. LefterDalaka (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bistricë, Albania (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not contain enough information. It does not even state that the village is in Albania.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bistricë, Albania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:GJOLEKA per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GJOLEKA. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 06:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lazaros Rota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet ban

I thought i was banned for some other reason but im not a sockpuppet of Gjoleka,the source that i used that you mention i took from the albanian page of ladochori(Ledhezë in the albanian page).I havent read through all everything you.Like i told you already i didny even know what a proxy was a few days ago and like another user mentioned most ips are just given out.I dont know how to prove to you how i am not a sockpuppet but if you can explain how to then i gladly will

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Oddsourceuser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im not a any type of sockpuppet account,and if i was i wouldn't be focusing on making draft pages on finiq,to put shortly i belive that you are reaching way too far with your accusations

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Im not a any type of sockpuppet account,and if i was i wouldn't be focusing on making draft pages on finiq,to put shortly i belive that you are reaching way too far with your accusations<span data-dtsignatureforswitching="1"></span> |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Im not a any type of sockpuppet account,and if i was i wouldn't be focusing on making draft pages on finiq,to put shortly i belive that you are reaching way too far with your accusations<span data-dtsignatureforswitching="1"></span> |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Im not a any type of sockpuppet account,and if i was i wouldn't be focusing on making draft pages on finiq,to put shortly i belive that you are reaching way too far with your accusations<span data-dtsignatureforswitching="1"></span> |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

. Oddsourceuser (talk) 12:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Even if you did copy the aforementioned inline citations (diff1, diff2) from the respective article of the Albanian Wikipedia (footnote1, footenote2), which I have no reason to doubt, it doesn't change the fact that Adriano sulejmani (GJOLEKA's sockpuppet) likewise copied inline citations to the same book (diff1, diff2) from the respective articles of the Albania Wikipedia (footnote1, footnote2), without properly changing the format for the English-speaking audience. Regardless, it is a combination of factors that led to your block. Furthermore, I find it interesting that on 10 November 2024 we have the administrator who reviewed your case expressing their inclination of you being a sockpuppet, and the very following day, on 11 November 2024, Coconut1187 gets registered (CA), who is yet another sockpuppet of GJOLEKA; as if GJOLEKA was expecting your block, and quickly went ahead to create a new one. Besides sockpuppetry, your activity has been disruptive for a number of other reasons (as indicated in this WP:ANI discussion), that a block was imminent anyway. Demetrios1993 (talk) 18:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt know who gjoleka was,nor do i care and your proof of me being a sockpuppet is 50/50 at best.Besides,why the hell did you guys delete my draft pages?Also if i was a sockpuppet then why am i still trying to get my account back?And a block on my part being imminent does not validate anything.And you have seen that i am not good at sourcing in wikipedia as you have seen my mistakes in my draft pages,you should know damn well im not sockpuppet.Also if possible and if i get unbanned is it possible to bring back my drafts? Oddsourceuser (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I necesarily dont agree with a ban on my part being imminent because not only am i not going to edit any non draft pages for a while nowBy the way,who is Gjoleka and what did he do? Oddsourceuser (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Çlirim,Finiq

Recently my draft got declined because it was mistaken for another village with the same name in Korçë,if anyone can do anything about it would mean a lot Oddsourceuser (talk) 12:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm being ignored

All of my draft pages been taken down due to alledged connections to Gjoleka at best,not only did anyone not even bother to ask me any questions when opening the gjoleka discussion about me but i also have had no chance to express myself.Firstly i have used 2 ips,one was the one i initially had and that was given to me after i had my initial ip(a day after it got banned i opened incognito and saw that my ip was now different when making edits),and i have been falsely accused of being a proxy account or using a proxy multiple times,someone also said that all the ips were on different devices(not true,both ips were connected to my phone and my laptop).And secondly the source used for ladochori was one that i took from the albanian page of ladochori.Even if i was a sockpuppet it would not be reasonable at all to take my drafts down that took me time to make,not to mention that they were sourced well Oddsourceuser (talk) 14:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GJOLEKA with my WP:CHECKUSER abilities, I agree with the technical findings there from Izno. Still extensive use of residential proxies. --Yamla (talk) 15:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And how am i supposed to prove you wrong? Oddsourceuser (talk) 15:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my finding is (1) you've been using residential proxies. You could stop using residential proxies. And (2) you are using a different device and a different IP address than previously blocked sockpuppets. I suppose you could prove me wrong by using the same device and the same IP address than previously blocked sockpuppets, though I'm not at all sure why you'd want to do that. And (3) you are signing in from the same country as previously blocked sockpuppets. I'm not sure why you'd want to change that. --Yamla (talk) 15:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I quickly looked at my edits and all of them have been set to my new ip, so if what you say is all i can do then i cant do anything, if there is anything else i can do tell me Oddsourceuser (talk) 15:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have a residential proxy and the phone that i currently use is the same,however i dont think i can get my old ip back as the new ip has become default to me,i will see what i can do Oddsourceuser (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]