User talk:Odarcan

Welcome!

Hello, Odarcan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 13 Emerald Tablets, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 20:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 13 Emerald Tablets

The article 13 Emerald Tablets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The book was made up by Doreal (who we do not advertise for), no WP:RSs, nothing estalishing WP:NOTE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Odarcan. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talk:Flower of Life

Stop wasting people's time arguing at Talk:Flower of Life. It is not going anywhere and it will not result in the restoration of any article. The proper remedy is to make a case to dispute the closing about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower of Life (2nd nomination) (or argue that new information for a basis for a new article) at WP:DRV. There will no be voting on restoring another article at that talk page, it's not the appropriate page. These procedures may seen arcane and idiotic but they have been developed over years and I suggest you review the policies and the basis for overturning any discussions there before going ahead or at least consider a middle ground like asking for a restoration of the page as a draft or something rather than continuing this routine that will ultimately end up nowhere. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 12:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to ask me if you need more help but going to the talk page about another article (and that is what it is now) does not help your cause and only serves to turn those editors against you. It is not their fault that the page got moved there so please so do not make more work for them. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 12:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to try to recreate the article at User:Odarcan/Flower of Life (geometry), you should consider asking the admin who closed the AFD discussion about moving all the old edits there so you have the full old article to work off. It's not an unreasonable request and it would save you quite a bit of time. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for helping, im not familiar with wp procedures, no one told me about undeletion, pls tell me who the deletion administrator is of the fol article. I must contact them first it says. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.253.182.106 (talk) 06:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

closing administrator.