User talk:Ocean8765
Appearance
Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Allegations of Israeli apartheid for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you.
- Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Allegations of Israeli apartheid for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. --Ave Caesar (talk) 21:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Allegations of Israeli apartheid for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ave Caesar (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
As a neutral administrator, I second this warning. The absolutely last thing we need right now is a new set of tendentious single-purpose accounts from the anti-Israel side trying to spam that story all over the place just to make the other side look bad. Please stop that. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- First there's no evidence that you're "neutral." I don't know anything about you. Also, I'm not "spamming" a story. I'm only trying to propose adding it to a single article. Since when are we not even allowed to propose additions? Further, that story is credible and the editors mentioned in the article have been banned from Wikipedia.--Ocean8765 (talk) 22:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Incidentally, they were banned on my initiative. Just as you are likely to be banned on my initiative if you go on pushing it here. See, that's how neutral I am. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Stop threatening me. I'm only trying to discuss a proposed and credible change to an article. --Ocean8765 (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Threatening? You were revert-warring on somebody else's user talk page. That in itself would be grounds for a short cool-off block. Moreoever, there is absolutely no doubt you are a tendentious single-purpose account created solely for POV-pushing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, Future. Ocean, you should see WP:SPA and Wikipedia:UN#Single-purpose_accounts concerning single-purpose accounts. --Ave Caesar (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Threatening? You were revert-warring on somebody else's user talk page. That in itself would be grounds for a short cool-off block. Moreoever, there is absolutely no doubt you are a tendentious single-purpose account created solely for POV-pushing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Stop threatening me. I'm only trying to discuss a proposed and credible change to an article. --Ocean8765 (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Incidentally, they were banned on my initiative. Just as you are likely to be banned on my initiative if you go on pushing it here. See, that's how neutral I am. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)