Jump to content

User talk:Ocaasi/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 15

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News 2015—#1

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has fixed many bugs and worked on VisualEditor's appearance, the coming Citoid reference service, and support for languages with complex input requirements. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. Upcoming plans are posted at the VisualEditor roadmap.

The Wikimedia Foundation has named its top priorities for this quarter (January to March). The first priority is making VisualEditor ready for deployment by default to all new users and logged-out users at the remaining large Wikipedias. You can help identify these requirements. There will be weekly triage meetings which will be open to volunteers beginning Wednesday, 11 February 2015 at 12:00 (noon) PST (20:00 UTC). Tell Vice President of Engineering Damon Sicore, Product Manager James Forrester and other team members which bugs and features are most important to you. The decisions made at these meetings will determine what work is necessary for this quarter's goal of making VisualEditor ready for deployment to new users. The presence of volunteers who enjoy contributing MediaWiki code is particularly appreciated. Information about how to join the meeting will be posted at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal shortly before the meeting begins. 

Due to some breaking changes in MobileFrontend and VisualEditor, VisualEditor was not working correctly on the mobile site for a couple of days in early January. The teams apologize for the problem.

Recent improvements

The new design for VisualEditor aligns with MediaWiki's Front-End Standards as led by the Design team. Several new versions of the OOjs UI library have also been released, and these also affect the appearance of VisualEditor and other MediaWiki software extensions. Most changes were minor, like changing the text size and the amount of white space in some windows. Buttons are consistently color-coded to indicate whether the action:

  • starts a new task, like opening the ⧼visualeditor-toolbar-savedialog⧽ dialog:  blue ,
  • takes a constructive action, like inserting a citation:  green ,
  • might remove or lose your work, like removing a link:  red , or
  • is neutral, like opening a link in a new browser window:  gray.

The TemplateData editor has been completely re-written to use a different design (T67815) based on the same OOjs UI system as VisualEditor (T73746). This change fixed a couple of existing bugs (T73077 and T73078) and improved usability.

Search and replace in long documents is now faster. It does not highlight every occurrence if there are more than 100 on-screen at once (T78234).

Editors at the Hebrew and Russian Wikipedias requested the ability to use VisualEditor in the "Article Incubator" or drafts namespace (T86688, T87027). If your community would like VisualEditor enabled on another namespace on your wiki, then you can file a request in Phabricator. Please include a link to a community discussion about the requested change.

Looking ahead

The Editing team will soon add auto-fill features for citations. The Citoid service takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. After creating it, you will be able to change or add information to the citation, in the same way that you edit any other pre-existing citation in VisualEditor. Support for ISBNs, PMIDs, and other identifiers is planned. Later, editors will be able to contribute to the Citoid service's definitions for each website, to improve precision and reduce the need for manual corrections.

We will need editors to help test the new design of the special character inserter, especially if you speak Welsh, Breton, or another language that uses diacritics or special characters extensively. The new version should be available for testing next week. Please contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF) if you would like to be notified when the new version is available. After the special character tool is completed, VisualEditor will be deployed to all users at Phase 5 Wikipedias. This will affect about 50 mid-size and smaller Wikipedias, including Afrikaans, Azerbaijani, Breton, Kyrgyz, Macedonian, Mongolian, Tatar, and Welsh. The date for this change has not been determined.

Let's work together

Subscribe or unsubscribe at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Newsletter. Translations are available through Meta. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 20:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Any data on TWA usage?

Hi Jake, Just curious if usage of TWA has gone up since the link was added to the welcome template. Thanks, --Biblioworm 18:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey Biblioworm, it will be easier to see a definitive jump (if one exists) after a few weeks. One context is that for the first 6 months of TWA, User:HostBot was inviting people automatically, then the bot stopped doing that for about 6 months, and now we have Welcome template but no HostBot invites. So I'd expect that we see more of a return to earlier levels and only a relative increase over no invites or templates at all. We don't have a very easy way to track game completion without doing a database query; we get an approximate look by checking the global usage for the final badge received in the game: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:GlobalUsage/TWA_badge_12.png
Just looking through the page history of those users, it doesn't look like more than a couple dozen recent completions. Jake Ocaasi t | c 19:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Talkback from Technical 13

Hello, Ocaasi. You have new messages at Technical 13's talk page.
Message added 20:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

{{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 20:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Percent of spam on Wikipedia

Hi Jake - I'm writing something about GLAMs and the GLAM-Wiki Initiative, and I was hoping you could help me find a particular piece of information. If I remember correctly, you talked briefly about spam in your presentation at ALA 2014 (Las Vegas). Did you have a percentage for the number of Wikipedia edits marked as spam? Or would you know if that statistic exists and where I could look for it? Thanks! extabulis (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Extabulis! Nice to see you on-wiki. I have not used spam stats in any presentations. The closest I can find is our revert rate, which across all of Wikipedia is around 9%. That's the number of edits that are entirely removed and returned to their prior state, a large number of which are vandalism or spam: http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/EditsRevertsEN.htm I hope that helps! Excited that you're writing about GLAM-Wiki :) Please share a link whenever it's published. Cheers, Jake Ocaasi t | c 20:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks very much - this is great! I'll definitely share a link. Hopefully I'll have another to share soon: our fall intern participated in the TWL Interns program and wrote a great post about her experience. I've been meaning to ask you or Sadads whether there's a place we can share that. Perhaps on the program page in a results section? We're still working on a few edits before I send it to our blog coordinator, but I hope to have it posted on our blog within the next month or so. extabulis (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey Extabulis: I have been meaning to talk with you more about the Interns program, and we would most certainly be able to crosspost it with the Wikimedia Foundation blog as well (probably with a bit of a frame). I will get an email off to you: in the meantime. Cheers, Astinson (WMF) (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey Astinson! Sounds great - I look forward to your email. extabulis (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015


Valentine Greets!!!

Valentine Greets!!!

Hello Ocaasi, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,
 - T H (here I am) 12:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons update

Greetings,

After a delay in updates to the Structured data on Commons project, I wanted to catch you up with what has been going on over the past three months. In short: The project is on hold, but that doesn't mean nothing is happening.

The meeting in Berlin in October provided the engineering teams with a lot to start on. Unfortunately the Structured Data on Commons project was put on hold not too long after this meeting. Development of the actual Structured data system for Commons will not begin until more resources can be allocated to it.

The Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Germany have been working to improve the Wikidata query process on the back-end. This is designed to be a production-grade replacement of WikidataQuery integrated with search. The full project is described at Mediawiki.org.This will benefit the structured data project greatly since developing a high-level search for Commons is a desired goal of this project.

The Wikidata development team is working on the arbitrary access feature. Currently it's only possible to access items that are connected to the current page. So for example on Vincent van Gogh you can access the statements on Q5582, but you can't access these statements on Category:Vincent van Gogh or Creator:Vincent van Gogh. With arbitrary access enabled on Commons we no longer have this limitation. This opens up the possibility to use Wikidata data on Creator, Institution, Authority control and other templates instead of duplicating the data (what we do now). This will greatly enhance the usefulness of Wikidata for Commons.

To use the full potential of arbitrary access the Commons community needs to reimplement several templates in LUA. In LUA it's possible to use the local fields and fallback to Wikidata if it's not locally available. Help with this conversion is greatly appreciated. The different tasks are tracked in phabricator, see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89594 .

Volunteers are continuing to add data about artworks to Wikidata. Sometimes an institution website is used and sometimes data is being transfered from Commons to Wikidata. Wikidata now has almost 35.000 items about paintings. This is done as part of the WikiProject sum of all paintings. This helps us to learn how to d:Wikidata:WikiProject Visual arts/Item structuremodel and refine metadata about artworks. Experience that will of course be very useful for Commons too.

Additionally, the metadata cleanup drive continues to produce results. The drive, which is intended to identify files missing {{information}} or the like structured data fields and to add such fields when absent, has reduced the number of files missing information by almost 100,000 on Commons. You can help by looking for files with similarly-formatted description pages, and listing them at Commons:Bots/Work requests so that a bot can add the {{information}} template on them.

At the Amsterdam Hackathon in November 2014, a couple of different models were developed about how artwork can be viewed on the web using structured data from Wikidata. You can browse two examples here and here. These examples can give you an idea of the kind of data that file pages have the potential to display on-wiki in the future.

The Structured Data project is a long-term one, and the volunteers and staff will continue working together to provide the structure and support in the back-end toward front-end development. There are still many things to do to help advance the project, and I hope to have more news for you in the near future. Contact me any time with questions, comments, concerns.

-- User:Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

16:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

Wikipedia Library and WikiEdu

Hi Jake,

It just occurred to me that we at WikiEdu don't really utilize the Wikipedia Library's resources in any way I can think of...and I don't know why. I'm hoping you'll indulge a few questions -- and I'm also hoping these aren't redundant to conversations you've had with my colleagues in the past (this message is just based on a thought I had rather than an official inquiry).

Is there a good brochure-type overview of what the Library offers? What are your thoughts on one for higher education students in particular?

Regarding databases: We support classes in the US/CA working on the English Wikipedia, but some don't have access to all the databases the Library does. Does a request for database access for students in a class conflict with the terms you've arranged with the publishers? What if it's on a per-student as needed basis rather than a whole class? (The problem I could see is that it could be seen as institutional rather than individual access, even though the institution wouldn't actually be involved).

Regarding the resource exchange, I was surprised not to find any clear overview of copyright issues. From looking at the talk page, it looks like people have identified parts of database terms of service that state the resources can be shared with other individuals privately for educational purposes, but before I direct instructors/students there I feel like I'd need something more concrete (to the extent anything regarding fair use can be concrete).

Thanks very much, and feel free to email me if it's easier for you (ryan [at] wikiedu [dot] edu). --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

16:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 10

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
  • New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
  • TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

15:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

15:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

15:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

quick question

do you know if the CURE Award for top 300 medical editors will be given this year? (just curious)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi User:Ozzie10aaaa, I don't, but I bet that Doc James does. Thanks for asking! Cheers, Jake Ocaasi t | c 23:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Will look into it with our data person. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

15:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

Talk back

Hello, Ocaasi. You have new messages at User talk:The Herald/Talkback.
Message added 05:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

VisualEditor News #2—2015

Did you know?

With Citoid in VisualEditor, you click the 'book with bookmark' icon and paste in the URL for a reliable source:


Screenshot of Citoid's first dialog


Citoid looks up the source for you and returns the citation results. Click the green "Insert" button to accept its results and add them to the article:


Screenshot of Citoid's initial results


After inserting the citation, you can change it. Select the reference, and click the "Edit" button in the context menu to make changes.


The user guide has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has fixed many bugs and worked on VisualEditor's performance, the Citoid reference service, and support for languages with complex input requirements. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. The worklist for April through June is available in Phabricator.

The weekly task triage meetings continue to be open to volunteers, each Wednesday at 11:00 (noon) PDT (18:00 UTC). You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration as a Q4 blocker. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the Editing team's Q4 blocker project with the bug. Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal.

Recent improvements

VisualEditor is now substantially faster. In many cases, opening the page in VisualEditor is now faster than opening it in the wikitext editor. The new system has improved the code speed by 37% and network speed by almost 40%.

The Editing team is slowly adding auto-fill features for citations. This is currently available only at the French, Italian, and English Wikipedias. The Citoid service takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. After creating it, you will be able to change or add information to the citation, in the same way that you edit any other pre-existing citation in VisualEditor. Support for ISBNs, PMIDs, and other identifiers is planned. Later, editors will be able to improve precision and reduce the need for manual corrections by contributing to the Citoid service's definitions for each website.

Citoid requires good TemplateData for your citation templates. If you would like to request this feature for your wiki, please post a request in the Citoid project on Phabricator. Include links to the TemplateData for the most important citation templates on your wiki.

The special character inserter has been improved, based upon feedback from active users. After this, VisualEditor was made available to all users of Wikipedias on the Phase 5 list on 30 March. This affected 53 mid-size and smaller Wikipedias, including AfrikaansAzerbaijaniBretonKyrgyzMacedonianMongolianTatar, and Welsh.

Work continues to support languages with complex requirements, such as Korean and Japanese. These languages use input method editors ("IMEs”). Recent improvements to cursoring, backspace, and delete behavior will simplify typing in VisualEditor for these users.

The design for the image selection process is now using a "masonry fit" model. Images in the search results are displayed at the same height but at variable widths, similar to bricks of different sizes in a masonry wall, or the "packed" mode in image galleries. This style helps you find the right image by making it easier to see more details in images.

You can now drag and drop categories to re-arrange their order of appearance ​on the page.

The pop-up window that appears when you click on a reference, image, link, or other element, is called the "context menu". It now displays additional useful information, such as the destination of the link or the image's filename. The team has also added an explicit "Edit" button in the context menu, which helps new editors open the tool to change the item.

Invisible templates are marked by a puzzle piece icon so they can be interacted with. Users also will be able to see and edit HTML anchors now in section headings.

Users of the TemplateData GUI editor can now set a string as an optional text for the 'deprecated' property in addition to boolean value, which lets you tell users of the template what they should do instead (T90734).

Looking ahead

The special character inserter in VisualEditor will soon use the same special character list as the wikitext editor. Admins at each wiki will also have the option of creating a custom section for frequently used characters at the top of the list. Instructions for customizing the list will be posted at mediawiki.org.

The team is discussing a test of VisualEditor with new users, to see whether they have met their goals of making VisualEditor suitable for those editors. The timing is unknown, but might be relatively soon.

Let's work together

  • Share your ideas and ask questions at mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.
  • Can you translate from English into any other language? Please check this list to see whether more interface translations are needed for your language. Contact us to get an account if you want to help!
  • The design research team wants to see how real editors work. Please sign up for their research program.
  • File requests for language-appropriate "Bold" and "Italic" icons for the character formatting menu in Phabricator.

Subscribe, unsubscribe or change the page where this newsletter is delivered at Meta. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

-Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk), 17:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

15:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

16:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: March 2015





Headlines


Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

16:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Look after it!

LewisMCYoutube (talk) 09:31, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Adventure - a small suggestion

Hi Ocaasi, long time no see. I'm just dropping by to voice a small concern regarding the Wikipedia Adventure - a user whom I happen to be watching is currently working through it, and as a result of Mission One ended up posting some personal information on their userpage that I felt it was necessary to redact. Since the Adventure is likely to be popular with younger users, would it be at all possible to slightly amend this section in order to put a bit more emphasis on not revealing personal information like your real name, age, school or location for editors under the age of majority? Cheers, Yunshui  11:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hey Yunshui, will this do? Cheers, Jake Ocaasi t | c 17:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
That looks fine to me - can't say we didn't warn them! Thanks for being so quick off the mark. Yunshui  07:22, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
What a coincidence that I found this (being the user you mentioned). --LewisMCYoutube (talk) 09:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

A barnstar for you!

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
I would like to dedicate this Barnstar for your "Wikipedia Adventure Project". Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 14:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

15:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Help to create Wiki Adventure in Tamil

Hi, I really loved the concept of The Wikipedia Adventure project, I would like to create the translated version in Tamil Wikipedia too. Need your source code and assistance for the same. Thanks. --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Dineshkumar Ponnusamy! Of course, all of the source code and Wikipedia page designs are free and open to use. You can find them all listed and documented here: WP:TWA/Index. I am excited about your idea to adapt this to Tamil Wikipedia. I have to say that it is probably a 3 month project for a single person to do, since it involves translation, page creation, code modifying, and bugtesting. I think it's worth it, especially if you have a team, but it does take a big effort! Please let me know if you need guidance, which I'm happy to provide within my challenging time-constraints working on The Wikipedia Library. You might learn a lot from other communities that have adapted TWA, such as Catalan WP. Cheers! Jake Ocaasi t | c 14:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for sharing the code and your valuable suggestions Ocaasi! Hopefully will form the team. I guess I'll manage it to complete by this June. Definitely will reach out to you if got stuck or have some suggestions. Cheers! --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

15:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
  • New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
  • Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter



MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

This Month in GLAM: April 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

15:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

15:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Taylor and Francis online

Jake, is there any progress on the front of getting Taylor & Francis Online for WP editors through the Wikipedia Library program. They've got the journal Labor History, which would be a massive help to me. Thanks. —Tim //// Carrite (talk) 15:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@Carrite: We are finalizing an agreement with them! We hope to announce that signup in June. Jake Ocaasi t | c 17:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for inviting me to the adventure! I will be there! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsliangel (talkcontribs) 16:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

16:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

16:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for inviting me to the Wikipedia Adventure -- Currently underway! Sketches0993 (talk) 11:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #3—2015

Did you know?

When you click on a link to an article, you now see more information:

Screenshot showing the link tool's context menu


The link tool has been re-designed:

Screenshot of the link inspector


There are separate tabs for linking to internal and external pages.

The user guide has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has created new interfaces for the link and citation tools, as well as fixing many bugs and changing some elements of the design. Some of these bugs affected users of VisualEditor on mobile devices. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. The worklist for April through June is available in Phabricator.

A test of VisualEditor's effect on new editors at the English Wikipedia has just completed the first phase. During this test, half of newly registered editors had VisualEditor automatically enabled, and half did not. The main goal of the study is to learn which group was more likely to save an edit and to make productive, unreverted edits. Initial results will be posted at Meta later this month.

Recent improvements

Auto-fill features for citations are available at a few Wikipedias through the citoid service. Citoid takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. If Citoid is enabled on your wiki, then the design of the citation workflow changed during May. All citations are now created inside a single tool. Inside that tool, choose the tab you want (⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-auto⧽, ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-manual⧽, or ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-reuse⧽). The cite button is now labeled with the word "⧼visualeditor-toolbar-cite-label⧽" rather than a book icon, and the autofill citation dialog now has a more meaningful label, "⧼Citoid-citeFromIDDialog-lookup-button⧽", for the submit button.

The link tool has been redesigned based on feedback from Wikipedia editors and user testing. It now has two separate sections: one for links to articles and one for external links. When you select a link, its pop-up context menu shows the name of the linked page, a thumbnail image from the linked page, Wikidata's description, and/or appropriate icons for disambiguation pages, redirect pages and empty pages. Search results have been reduced to the first five pages. Several bugs were fixed, including a dark highlight that appeared over the first match in the link inspector (T98085).  

The special character inserter in VisualEditor now uses the same special character list as the wikitext editor. Admins at each wiki can also create a custom section for frequently used characters at the top of the list. Please read the instructions for customizing the list at mediawiki.org. Also, there is now a tooltip to describing each character in the special character inserter (T70425).

Several improvements have been made to templates. When you search for a template to insert, the list of results now contains descriptions of the templates. The parameter list inside the template dialog now remains open after inserting a parameter from the list, so that users don’t need to click on "⧼visualeditor-dialog-transclusion-add-param⧽" each time they want to add another parameter (T95696). The team added a new property for TemplateData, "Example", for template parameters. This optional, translatable property will show up when there is text describing how to use that parameter (T53049).

The design of the main toolbar and several other elements have changed slightly, to be consistent with the MediaWiki theme. In the Vector skin, individual items in the menu are separated visually by pale gray bars. Buttons and menus on the toolbar can now contain both an icon and a text label, rather than just one or the other. This new design feature is being used for the cite button on wikis where the Citoid service is enabled.

The team has released a long-desired improvement to the handling of non-existent images. If a non-existent image is linked in an article, then it is now visible in VisualEditor and can be selected, edited, replaced, or removed.

Let's work together

  • Share your ideas and ask questions at mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.
  • The weekly task triage meetings continue to be open to volunteers, each Wednesday at 12:00 (noon) PDT (19:00 UTC). Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal. You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration as a Q4 blocker. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the Editing team's Q4 blocker project with the bug.
  • If your Wikivoyage, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, or other community wants to have VisualEditor made available by default to contributors, then please contact James Forrester.
  • If you would like to request the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki, please post a request in the Citoid project on Phabricator. Include links to the TemplateData for the most important citation templates on your wiki.

Subscribe, unsubscribe or change the page where this newsletter is delivered at Meta. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

17:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

  • Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
  • Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
  • Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
  • Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.
Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

those training badges, just asking why...

  • hello, I'm just bothering you because i saw your username in the hist of one of those student training badges. I was just wondering, when the badges are awarded automatically, why are they placed on user pages instead of appended to user talk pages? It sorta doesn't make sense to me. Cheers. • ArchReader 05:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
    Hi Arch! A talk page is for messages and awards given from one user to another. A userpage is to show off those awards and other marks of achievement. We placed the badges on the userpage because they show off the achievement of meaningful learning through The Wikipedia Adventure, because those are real 'skills' of the user, in real Wikipedia and not just in the game. It's also ok to move them wherever you want them to go, but that's why we wanted them on the userpage. Otherwise, how'd you like the game (if you played it?) Cheers, Jake Ocaasi t | c 05:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
    I've been editing for 8 years, so I didn't play the game. ;-) But your answer seems reasonable. I hope the game includes one question that explains the difference between user page & user talk, because I saw one neophyte (forgot who) putting userpage-type info on their talk page. Good luck in all things. • ArchReader

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

15:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your thoughts?

Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - SummerPhDv2.0 13:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Hi and sorry, but I reverted your addition to the watchlist notifications. Editors normally have to propose these messages on the talk page and get consensus before posting. I don't think it is appropriate for this step to be skipped just because you have the technical ability to edit this page. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi MSGJ and thanks for your note. I was pretty surprised when I saw that you had removed it, particularly because it's never happened before despite using watchlist notices semi-regularly in the past 3 years. I'm not sure I agree with the principle that admins should have to get full approval every time, as part of their position indicates trust in judgement. Is this documented anywhere? I'm open to discussing further and won't take it personally if we find ourselves doing so at another time, which unfortunately won't be now as I'm slammed with Wikimania preparations.
In any case, we retargeted our strategy with a geonotice which is more appropriate given the U.S.-centric nature of position. Best, Jake Ocaasi t | c 16:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

JC's Girls

Hi Jake,

Might you have time to review an article I currently have up for featured status? It's called JC's Girls. The reviewers who have contributed to the FAC so far seem sharply divided, and I would greatly appreciate your thoughts.

Neelix (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

NPYS4

NPYS4
The NPYS4 for helping the world NPYS4 (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

NPYS4 (talk)

Thanks so much, that means a lot to me! Jake Ocaasi t | c 10:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Ocaasi. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 17:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Newyorkadam (talk) 17:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

First ever volunteer at DRN

I was doing some wandering down memory lane today, and noticed that you were the first ever DRN volunteer :) Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
  • Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
  • Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
  • American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

03:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Library edit

You're welcome. It was the least I could do. I ALWAYS like to do the least I can do.

Seriously, I had to leave you a note. Not only do I enjoy your music, but your user page looks to be the most useful, and most user-friendly, that I have found throughout Wikipedia. THANK YOU. I will be bookmarking it and revisiting it. Thank you. Rags (talk) 14:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Women

Hi, I see you recently joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. I've made a proposal to merge this project into Wikipedia:WikiProject Women at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red, so we can not only cover missing articles but focus on general quality of women's biographies. If interested please put your name down on the WP:Women page at the bottom.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:07, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey, thought you might be interested to know that Medicine.wiki is now active, in case you and/or other Wiki Project Med participants want to contribute in some way. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:35, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

Very Nice

Very Nice Awesome Work Dear :) Thanks --Hazrat Waqar (talk) 12:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

VisualEditor News #4—2015

Read this in another languageLocal subscription listSubscribe to the multilingual edition

Did you know?

You can add quotations marks before and after a title or phrase with a single click.

Select the relevant text. Find the correct quotations marks in the special character inserter tool (marked as Ω in the toolbar).

Screenshot showing the special character tool, selected text, and the special character that will be inserted


Click the button. VisualEditor will add the quotation marks on either side of the text you selected.

Screenshot showing the special character tool and the same text after the special character has been inserted


You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team have been working on mobile phone support. They have fixed many bugs and improved language support. They post weekly status reports on mediawiki.org. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving language support and functionality on mobile devices.

Wikimania

The team attended Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City. There they participated in the Hackathon and met with individuals and groups of users. They also made several presentations about VisualEditor and the future of editing.

Following Wikimania, we announced winners for the VisualEditor 2015 Translathon. Our thanks and congratulations to users Halan-tul, Renessaince, जनक राज भट्ट (Janak Bhatta), Vahe Gharakhanyan, Warrakkk, and Eduardogobi.

For interface messages (translated at translatewiki.net), we saw the initiative affecting 42 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 56.5% before the translathon, and 78.2% after (+21.7%). In particular, Sakha improved from 12.2% to 94.2%; Brazilian Portuguese went from 50.6% to 100%; Taraškievica went from 44.9% to 85.3%; Doteli went from 1.3% to 41.2%. Also, while 1.7% of the messages were outdated across all languages before the translathon, the percentage dropped to 0.8% afterwards (-0.9%).

For documentation messages (on mediawiki.org), we saw the initiative affecting 24 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 26.6% before translathon, and 46.9% after (+20.3%).  There were particularly notable achievements for three languages. Armenian improved from 1% to 99%; Swedish, from 21% to 99%, and Brazilian Portuguese, from 34% to 83%. Outdated translations across all languages were reduced from 8.4% before translathon to 4.8% afterwards (-3.6%).

We published some graphs showing the effect of the event on the Translathon page. Thank you to the translators for participating and the translatewiki.net staff for facilitating this initiative.

Recent improvements

Auto-fill features for citations can be enabled on each Wikipedia. The tool uses the citoid service to convert a URL or DOI into a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. You can see an animated GIF of the quick, simple process at mediawiki.org. So far, about a dozen Wikipedias have enabled the auto-citation tool. To enable it for your wiki, follow the instructions at mediawiki.org.

Your wiki can customize the first section of the special character inserter in VisualEditor. Please follow the instructions at mediawiki.org to put the characters you want at the top. 

In other changes, if you need to fill in a CAPTCHA and get it wrong, then you can click to get a new one to complete. VisualEditor can now display and edit Vega-based graphs. If you use the Monobook skin, VisualEditor's appearance is now more consistent with other software.  

Future changes

The team will be changing the appearance of selected links inside VisualEditor. The purpose is to make it easy to see whether your cursor is inside or outside the link. When you select a link, the link label (the words shown on the page) will be enclosed in a faint box. If you place your cursor inside the box, then your changes to the link label will be part of the link. If you place your cursor outside the box, then it will not. This will make it easy to know when new characters will be added to the link and when they will not.

On the English Wikipedia, 10% of newly created accounts are now offered both the visual and the wikitext editors. A recent controlled trial showed no significant difference in survival or productivity for new users in the short term. New users with access to VisualEditor were very slightly less likely to produce results that needed reverting. You can learn more about this by watching a video of the July 2015 Wikimedia Research Showcase. The proportion of new accounts with access to both editing environments will be gradually increased over time. Eventually all new users have the choice between the two editing environments.

Let's work together

  • Share your ideas and ask questions at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback.
  • Can you read and type in Korean or Japanese? Language engineer David Chan needs people who know which tools people use to type in some languages. If you speak Japanese or Korean, you can help him test support for these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help.
  • If your wiki would like VisualEditor enabled on another namespace, you can file a request in Phabricator. Please include a link to a community discussion about the requested change.
  • Please file requests for language-appropriate "Bold" and "Italic" icons for the styling menu in Phabricator.
  • The design research team wants to see how real editors work. Please sign up for their research program.
  • The weekly task triage meetings continue to be open to volunteers, usually on Tuesdays at 12:00 (noon) PDT (19:00 UTC). Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration as a Q1 blocker, though. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the main VisualEditor project with the bug.

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact Elitre directly, so that she can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

14:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Women in Red

Formal merge proposal
There is currently a merge discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Formal merge proposal. As you are a member of WiR, this is a courtesy notification in case you want to join in the discussion. Thank you. Rosiestep (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Wikipedia Adventure

@Ocaasi:, remember me? Just wanted to congratulate you with the start of this. It really looks great and I do think there should be a userbox template. I'll try to make one, see if it works. Lotje (talk) 15:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC).

@Ocaasi: Just found what I was looking for, the {{Wikipedia:TWA/Userbox}} right on your userpage! Thnks. Lotje (talk) 05:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for sending me the Wikipedia Adventure!

Dear Ocaasi,

Thank you so much for sending me the link to The Wikipedia Adventure tutorial. It was very, very helpful. Your past work in Wikipedia is most impressive, and I am have also been involved in alternative (non-pharmaceutical natural medicine) for many years. As Hippocrates observed, let food me your medicine and let you medicine be your food, except most of the junk food in the supermarkets is not fit to eat. Thank you again for the help. Harry W Braun III Harry W Braun III (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Thank you for taking part in the Community Health learning campaign!

Trust

Hi Ocaasi,
I wanted to share back with you the drawing you contributed to the community health mural we hosted in Mexico City. Thanks for taking part! The campaign is going on until Sunday this weekend, and users are still very active answering some questions related to community health. We would love to see your views there, as well!
Happy editing! María (WMF) (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Is TWA too encouraging?

Hello Ocaasi, and thank-you for the Bach Cello Suite! The reason for my attention-grabbing headline is this: Over at the GA Help Desk we encountered an enthusiastic young person who finished The Wikipedia Adventure, then immediately embarked on a flurry of activity outlined here: Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Bulk reviews and nominations by new editor

It was rather unfortunate: It is causing one of us a bit of work to back out their changes, and I'm sure the poor young editor feels badly now after such initial enthusiasm. I hope you agree that what we have to do is necessary, but more than that, I came here to ask: Does TWA encourage new editors to achieve so much so quickly? I'm sure it urges them to be bold of course, but hopefully it also includes a small caution as well? I have not checked to read it for myself, as I am afraid the portal will write to my user space without my permission. I truly respect you for your efforts at TWA as I have heard good things about it. Thank-you for your time. Prhartcom (talk) 21:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Prhartcom! Thanks for your friendly heads up. I have a few thoughts. The first, and least helpful, is that over-eager contributors often turn into prolific contributors once they settle down and learn the ropes. That doesn't help you, of course. Second, this contributor appears to have a history of editing and doesn't fit the typical newbie profile that TWA aims for; in other words, this isn't typical behavior. Last, and most importantly, as you would glean from a 1-hour romp through TWA (which does edit your userpages, but quite trivially and clean-up-ably), TWA really doesn't encourage editors to do anything but go exploring. TWA doesn't mention GA in any form, so discovering it would be a feat of sheer determination and unbridled initiative. It's the kind of action that I don't think any warning could stop, nor a situation uniquely caused by TWA's positive tone. I can't quite bring myself to add 'cautions' about editing Wikipedia into a game about it's openness and potential for mastery over time--because WP:Be Bold is how newbies learn. That's not saying going to nominate 18 articles at GAN was sane or reasonable in any way, but I think it's just the kind of thing that happens some time around here, and we have to accept it as part of the process of being open and teaching newcomers. Happy to discuss further. Check out the game, please, if you have a specific suggestion about how/where such a warning would be appropriate. I think you'll see TWA is likely not the active reagent here. Best, Jake Ocaasi t | c 22:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

WikiProject Unreferenced articles

It's been years since I last checked Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Unreferenced articles, but thanks for your suggestion! I've added the Wikipedia Library banner to the project page. Hope everything is going well. By the way, please feel free to join the WikiProject you wish. The hallways around there have gotten quieter and the dust keeps settling on our slowly shrinking piles of unreferenced articles, but some of us are still active. Altamel (talk) 16:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership

You are invited!World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in LeadershipCome and join us remotely!
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015

The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← --Ipigott (talk) 09:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR

Hi Ocaasi, I left a proposal at Wikipedia talk:The Wikipedia Library/JSTOR/Archive1#Export Citations to have an option for Wikipedia's citation style in "Export Citations" but it didn't got any further responses except Johnbod's comment. So I am assuming it can't be done or is technically unfeasible. Is it so?

The reason I am badgering for this is I am seeking more co-operation between Wikisource and Wikipedia and have "identified"/started transcription projects of several public domain "book series" (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and others are on the line...). It is true as Johnbod said that cut&paste works well if you are dealing with a single or a couple of articles but certainly doesn't in the scale I am doing things. Two other people I know (Billinghurst and John Carter) probably also can attest to this.

In light of this I wonder if you (or someone else) can take this matter with JSTOR. Best regards. Solomon7968 21:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm actually attempting to get together a few "library" pages right now, like those at Category:WikiProject libraries, for currenly well-regarded works still included in recent bibliographies that are in the public domain. And my wikisource:User:John Carter lists a few reference books in the PD as well. Having said all that, I am not myself necessarily sure that JSTOR is necessarily the way to go. Internet Archive, at least so far as I have seen, includes access to most of those I've found, although, I have to admit, it would be great to have the others as well. I would myself love to see wikisource do a bit more specifically regarding PD encyclopedic or overview articles which are still considered good enough for inclusion in bibliographies of modern reference works. And, believe it or not, there actually are quite a few of them. John Carter (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
John Carter, this sounds like a cool project, can you explain more? We're working on a bibliography of free resources as part of our Library, so there might be some opportunity for collaboration there.
Solomon, it probably could be done, but might not be easy to do well. For example, the Wikipedia citations from Trove (National Library of Australia) are fairly widely used, but have also been problematic in terms of formatting (for example, linking the publication The Chronicle to the general Wikipedia article chronicle). The Interior might know who at JSTOR to talk to, but he's on vacation at the moment. In the interim though, since JSTOR support BibTex export, you can try using a tool like BibTex2Wiki to convert. For some reason this version of that tool has fewer options than the older, so there might be a better option. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
You can of course use Zotero plugin to do the conversion to Wiki citation format. I just retested RIS export from JSTOR to Zotero followed by export from Zotero to Wikipedia citation template and the only extra step is that you have to saves it to a file and then open in it a text editor rather than show on screen. It might work more efficiently for bulk cases since you can export a large set of references from Zotero to Wiki citation format. (PS - see steps here) Shyamal (talk) 06:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Awesome Shyamal! I just tested Zotero with this and it took me less than a minute to do the whole thing. Almost certainly it would have taken me some 10 mins otherwise. This process really needs more advertising. Solomon7968 07:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I always thought this was obvious and well-known! I run Wikipedia workshops for researchers and for many, bibliographic tools are second nature. Obviously assumptions are a problem. Shyamal (talk) 07:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

In lieu of JSTOR doing something, why don't we have a tool at ToolLabs that can take the other formats, and convert into a WP citation format. Alternatively and maybe better look to a means to have a tool that takes these references and plugs them into Wikidata, then have a citation type template here that takes the Wikidata using the arbitrary data linking and spits out something neat. I think pinging Lydia or Magnus to see what could be scoped would be truly more useful to get those refs into WD, and therefore permanently available, and more readily updateable. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

@Nikkimaria: There unfortunately really isn't that much more to say other than I have gotten a few pages together to date, and have quite a few more in longhand waiting to be transferred based on other similar topical reference works. Ideally, for the OCD type among us, which probably includes me to some extent, I think, some years ago now, and it certainly feels like years ago at this point, I added to the Bibliography of encyclopedias pages all the PD reference works included in the old 1986 Sheehy Guide to Reference. I have since, off and on, more off than on recently, downloaded the current Guide to Reference from the ALA site and been adding the encyclopedic type sources it contains to the bibliography lists. And, on the talk pages of the library pages, I am also trying to add a version of the list ranking works by the number of bibliographies from that list they are included in. The ones most commonly cited might be among the more valuable sources for wikisource to have available in proofread versions which could serve of at least partial basis for all the still-missing articles we have compared to other encyclopedic sources. Ideally, I guess, my goal might be to have pages like Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/Encyclopedic articles, which probably should be renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/Prospectus and Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/Library included in the average project banner, where such pages exist. But, having been going through the ranking list for the Religion Library page for about a week now, believe me when I say that such efforts take a lot of time. John Carter (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

21:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Smithsonian APA Center & Women in Red virtual edit-a-thon on APA women

Asian Pacific American Women World Virtual Edit-a-thon
"The Smithsonian APA Center invites you to attend the 2nd annual Wikipedia APA an editathon for cultural presence, which will be held during the month of September 2015. We are thrilled to invite you to Wikipedia APA, an editing event for improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to Asian Pacific American ("APA") experiences. The second Wikipedia editathon dedicated to APA content, this project will occur as physical events during September 2015... as well as remotely, with participants taking part from all throughout the world."
Did you Know that 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? Not impressed? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! WiR will be hosting one of this world virtual edit-a-thon. The 3-day event will focus on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Asian Pacific American women and their works (books, paintings, and so on).

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Five minutes to help make WikiProjects better

Hello!

First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)

Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

This Month in GLAM: August 2015





Headlines


  • UK report: QRpedia AWOL; RSC holds another edit-a-thon
  • Special story: New toolkit on Photo Events documents best practices, strategies and more
  • Open Access report: Wikipedia as an amplyfier; horse face recognition, rhythm perception, fossil rodent teeth
  • Wikidata report: Wikidata this month
  • Calendar: September's GLAM events



Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Nomination of The Beijing Axis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Beijing Axis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beijing Axis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 23:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

16:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

Ocaasi: Thank you. I am getting a bit of confrontation by some user who keep "Undoing" systematically my edits. My edits are truthful and yet , because I am new am I supposed to defer to them although some of the information they put while not totally false is still less precise that the one I am giving.

I supposed this was a collaborative effort and yet I am simple being"UNDOED" for no good reason.

Please illustrate me how this is supposed to work?

I am only trying to do the best for the community but it feels like I'm stepping on someones toes.

Read the History , and the Talk page of Proteus and see for yourself.

Thanks Rudy235 (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)