User talk:ObsidianCommand
Appearance
This is ObsidianCommand's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
January 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Power Rangers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Power Rangers was changed by ObsidianCommand (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944925 on 2012-01-05T14:31:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
- Could someone report Cluebot's revert to the owner of Cluebot - the "edit" which the IP Address made looked like vandalism to me and I don't appreciate being told off for an edit which I didn't make the only edit I made was reverting the vandalism. ObsidianCommandtalk 14:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- It looks like someone already reported the edit as a false positive. Sorry about that, but think of how many edits Cluebot puts through - one mistake here or there isn't unexpected. There's a reason the summary offers links for reporting false positives. No worries. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:57, 5 January 2012 (UTC)