User talk:Observer29

Hebrew font

I have reverted your change of font of the Tetragrammaton as the stylised font is less authentic. Whether either font is 'better' is subjective, but the other rendition more closely resembles the Hebrew script found in original texts.--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Jeffro. I disagree. However, I'm not going to engage in a back and forth edit/re-edit exercise. Regards.--Observer29 (talk) 16:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you don't like about the standard Hebrew font used in Wikipedia - I find it very legible. Different browsers and operating systems don't necessarily render foreign scripts the same way too, so it's possibly just something on your system. Maybe see Help:Multilingual support --Jeffro77 (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cities

Yes, it would be consistent to add the recent cities to the Scotland/NI history sections... I'm not sure when or how the decision on what was historic was made. It might be have been an attempt to avoid repetition. Lozleader (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brighton date

Please go on and change it then. This is a wiki. Mistaking something that was announced to happen in 2000 but did not happen until January 2001 for something that happened in 2000 seems like a fairly understandable error. Anyway, the "2000" in fact pre-dated the edit you point at - that edit corrected "royal charter" to "letters patent" without noticing the error of date. 81.137.246.159 (talk) 14:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]