User talk:Obscuredata

Welcome

Hello, Obscuredata! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 02:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Warnings

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oxford Round Table, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oxford Round Table was changed by Obscuredata (c) (t) deleting 7607 characters on 2008-01-18T07:41:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Oxford_Round_Table, you will be blocked from editing.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Oxford_Round_Table. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Oxford Round Table has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Majorly (talk) 17:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I thought that the edit was vandalism, but couldn't see it to be, although I maybe incorrect. -- The Helpful One ^(Talk)^{(Contribs) (Review)} 18:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Oxford Round Table. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Threatening to continue edit warring unless your preferred version of this article is in place is not constructive and conflicts with the principle of obtaining consensus for changes particularly in light of recent content disputes Coldmachine^Talk 19:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Coldmachine: Referring to the above message.. Same to you ! Obscuredata (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't blocked

You aren't blocked. Instead, the article has been protected from editing in an effort to stop the edit warring. Please see Talk:Oxford_Round_Table#Protected. --Ronz (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest warning

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Oxford Round Table, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Pairadox (talk) 03:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Oxford Round Table

An editor has nominated Oxford Round Table, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Round Table and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Coldmachine^Talk 23:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Your comments at the Deletion page are way out of line. This is the only warning I'll issue before bringing it to the attention of admins. Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pairadox (talk) 06:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked this as a disruptive single purpose account. Guy (Help!) 20:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Obscuredata (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]