User talk:Obiwan2208-2

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 22:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obiwan2208-2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, unblock me, the reason is i will not vandalize again. Obiwan2208-2 (talk) 07:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You aren't blocked for vandalism, you are blocked for violating WP:3RR. You will need to address this in your next unblock request, I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Obiwan2208-2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, i will not violate WP:3RR again never. Obiwan2208-2 (talk) 08:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Block expired ST47 (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FAO @Ymblanter, 331dot, ST47, and Materialscientist: this editor is back at it - abusing Twinkle to edit war at my talk page and continually re-add a bogus 'final warning' for vandalism and also accusing me of sockpuppetry (?!). Please can you review. Personally I'd be keen on an indef CIR block. Giant Snowman 10:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. I would strongly suggest that you cease using Twinkle, you are not using it properly. 331dot (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's absurd AIV report and vandalism warnings, their disruptive move warring of a category talk page without moving the associated category page, and use of RFPP as an attempt to get their way does not inspire much confidence. They also gamed autoconfirmed with minor edits to their userpage before immediately installing Twinkle. This is clearly not a new user. ST47 (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obiwan2208-2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, unblock me, i will not vandalize again never.

Decline reason:

As you are unwilling or unable to articulate exactly what was wrong with your edits, and don't seem to want to respond to my comments, I must decline your request. I get the sense that you perhaps lack the skills and maturity needed to participate here, and I suggest that you wait for some time(months if not years) for you to mature as a person and editor before requesting unblock again. 331dot (talk) 13:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You will need to explain your edits and how they were wrong. I think agreeing to stop using Twinkle will also be required. If this is not your first account, I suggest that you be honest and tell us any other accounts you have used. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will not vandalize again never, i will become me a Bureaucrat and i will grant Administrator for me.--Obiwan2208-2 (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]