User talk:Oaxaca dan

Welcome!

Hello, Oaxaca dan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Sir james paul 20:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Mesoamerica

Hi there Oaxaca dan- just like to say thanks for your fine work on the Chunchucmil article and several others on Mesoamerica-related topics. If as it seems Mesoamerican archaeology is your field of interest and expertise, then you may possibly be interested in WikiProject Mesoamerica, a collaborative project formed by some wikipedia editors with the intention of coordinating the expansion and improvements to Mesoamerica-related materials around here. You'd be most welcome to drop by there and help out; there are only about half-a-dozen or so folks who are active at any given time working regularly on Mesoamerica-related articles, and so any and all assistance given is much appreciated- as you can plainly see there's a lot of scope for improvement across a number of areas.

Feel free to ask any general questions, either at the project's messageboard or on my talk page (note I myself will not be around here much over the next two weeks, so may be some time in responding) or the talk pages of any of the active contributors.

In any event, hope you enjoy your experience at wikipedia, whatever or how frequently you are able to contribute. Kind regards, --cjllw | TALK 02:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff (re:Thanks)

Hi dan, you are most welcome. The work you and Chunc have been doing on that article has been quite fantastic, and your other related updates have been equally informative and highly useful. I am glad that so far you've had a gratifying experience editing here- there can be from time to time some frustrating experiences and trying encounters, but in the main it's usually pretty good. As you will have seen as you look around the Meso-related material, there's an endless amount of improvement and expansion to be done, so we are very glad for any time you can spare! If there's anything about wikipedia arcana I can help you out with, I'd be pleased to try.

Re the Chunchucmil article itself, when you guys are finished with it I'd say it would be just about ready for nomination as a Featured Article, or if not certainly as a Good Article. If you wanted to take it in that direction (not that you have to), then one thing which would help would be to add a few more inline citations or footnotes at pertinent junctures in the text to specific references; this may help those who are not as familiar with the background material. You could either do the inline cites Harvard-style as at present, or use footnotes/refs (see WP:CITE, also Mayan languages for an example of the latter in use).

Anyways, certainly appreciate your great work. Kind regards,--cjllw | TALK 07:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article size

Hey there dan. Re your question, guidelines on recommended maxima for article sizes may be found at WP:SIZE. Basically, anywhere around 8000 to 10000 words is generally regarded as being the practical upper limit for a single article, ie 40-50 KB in size. Much beyond that and the page can take too much time to load up in some system configurations, or may not load up at all in some older ones (the restriction used to be around 32KB in size, which is still a limitation in for eg mobile browsers). There are also human readability considerations if a single page takes up much more.

The Mesoamerica article currently weighs in at around 64KB, which might be acceptable for such a broad-topic area, but we should probably aim to make it a little shorter. The solution in cases such as this where there's plainly a huge amount of useful and relevant info which could and should be written on a particular topic, is to use separate articles to contain the detail, by subtopics, and use the main article to link these together while still providing a summary of the main points.--cjllw | TALK 03:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum- I've made some notes at talk:Chunchucmil about how to effect the auto-numbering and generation of footnotes, since I had noticed that you'd given that a trial run on that article. The present Harvard-style cites used there should be fine as they are, my notes there are just in case you'd like to implement the autonumbering on another article someplace. Cheers, --cjllw | TALK 03:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your comments at Colombo article peer review. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ^Talk 06:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My email is rvillalobos(at)guate.net.gt I think we really can put Mesoamerica as a Class A articlemayasautenticos 00:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Authenticmayamayasautenticos 00:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

SW

Hey, glad to be of use in the creation of Shadow World stuff in Wikipedia. I've been waiting for a long time for someone to start the article. I guess I'm not bold enough myself. Although I can't promise to start new articles (I still feel weird knowing that millions will read and learn based on what I write), I'll check the whole category almost every day. Thanks again for having started the articles.--Voriig Kye 18:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monte Albán

Gidday dan - once again, some great work by you in improving the Monte Albán article. A quick question- would you be able to confirm, or know of any sources for, the statement in that article which claims the site's name in some Zapotecan dialect is/was Danipaguache, and if so whether or not the glossed meaning given is ok? It's not that I really doubt it, but when I had a look at it last time I was unable to track down sources to confirm. I presume also that it's at least a post-conquest attribution, ie the contemporary name(s) are unconfirmed..? --cjllw | TALK 02:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Site map for Teopantecuanitlan??

Dan, I believe that the Teopantecuanitlan article could benefit from a site map. Might you have such a map, or know where I can find one? Let me know, and thanks, Madman 04:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would think that the site maps you would have are copyrighted, and so should not be uploaded here. Let me know if you do find any and we can think about getting the information to the right person (I'm thinking of asking the same one who did La Venta and Monte Alban, but only if I can find enough maps.) Madman 02:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help. Madman 03:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Olmec question'

Howdy dan. I dunno whether Olmec-related matters are part of your speciality, but our WP:MESO colleague Madman has made an excellent start on an article to survey and describe Olmec influences on Mesoamerican cultures, in an attempt to sort out and document the various academic points of view on "the Olmec question" and the "mother- vs sister-culture" debate. If and when you've some time, perhaps you could look it over and see if there's anything which can be expanded upon, or if you know of any other key references which could be used- either on the nature and extent of Olmec/Olmecoid influences, or on contemporary or even earlier Mesoamerican sites/cultures for comparison purposes. Cheers, --cjllw | TALK 05:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the note cjllw - I will take a look at it and see if I can contribute at all (though I dabble in Olmec stuff, its not my forté, so to speak) or offer any suggestions. -- Oaxaca dan 15:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind comments concerning this article. It's particularly exciting coming from a pro like you. Wow. I am touched. Thanks so much, Madman 15:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping improve WP:Mesoamerica

It looks like we are finally going to be able to get a real move on the project. There are so many areas of Mesoamericanistics that need attention but now we are working on some of them. ·Maunus· ·ƛ· 21:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Maunus!! Doing what I can to help out. -- Oaxaca dan 00:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments, Dan. I have been on a tear lately, but will be cutting back. And you are not only welcome, but encouraged to edit "my" articles. Thanks again, Madman 19:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing topcs

Thank for your notes in the archaeological missing topics page. I had actually missed the more formal term for stone knapping... - Skysmith 12:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean me?

English is my first language, but it's true that my mind often works in tortuously twisted ways, which comes out in my grammar. No offense taken at all - actually, if it is me, I'm flattered by the "excellent" - but I was just wondering. And if it is me, I'm fine, but have decided to cut back on Wikipedia. --Homunq 19:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

North America (Americas)

Would you please vote in this issue? North America (Americas) is an article I created and now it is nominated for deletion by Corticopia, who says it was the result of a POV fork, which is not, because the creation of the article had nothing to do with disagreements in the article North America nor other article. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Let's talk! )} 23:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Palace

The Red Palace is a structure at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan that was likely an elite residence (at least according to Richard Diehl). Google "Red Palace" "San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan" for some mentions. I haven't seen anything exhaustive on the Red Palace - it always seems to be mentioned but never fully explored. Maybe you could write an article on it. : ) Madman 18:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grinding stone image

Taken on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevada mountains in east-central California. If you need more specific info, I can dig a bit further. :) --mav 18:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great work...

Hi there dan - I note you've been quite busy around here of late! Just dropping by to say thanks for your recent efforts in doing some clearing up the backlog on the WP:MESO cleanup listings- what with all that there is to do around here, activities like that are all too-frequently overlooked. There's still a ways to go, but with great efforts like yours we're making inroads- thanks again!

BTW- haven't seen friend Chun/DH about of late. Guess he's tied up with FAMSI- have you heard from him recently? Cheers, --cjllw | TALK 07:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 20:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back...

Hi there dan, good to see your name popping up on the WP:MESO edit watchlists again. Guess you've been busy elsewhere, maybe out in the field? Anyways, just thought I'd drop a quick line to say howdy. Cheers, --cjllw ʘ TALK 03:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NYS archeological sites

Hi Oaxaca dan -- I wonder if you could visit the articles on Ganondagan State Historic Site, Fort Corchaug Archaeological Site, Fort Massapeag Archaeological Site, Lamoka, and Schuyler Flatts. These are 5 archaeological sites on the List of National Historic Landmarks in New York. I've contributed to them, but they sure could use some more development. Just following up on your stated interests on the NYS wikiproject page. Cheers, doncram (talk) 06:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jaiman (Shadow World)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Jaiman (Shadow World), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Latin-American Wikipedia Meeting

"Latin-American Wikipedians,unite us!"

Hi wikipedian!Today I'm going to talk you about a new proposal that can to advantage you and many other users of Latin America.

You,that is from Latin America (second your userbox),already shall to have observed the importance of the Wikimedia Frojects in the region.Only Wikipedia represent 40% of the internet access^[1].With every this importance,why don't we make a big meeting?

Of this idea,was borned the proposal for a Latin-American Wikipedian Meeting.Various Wikipedists has Latin-American users and this is a proposal of a culture and ideas interchange,that can be help all projects.Above this,comtemplate to help in the formation of new WMF chapters in Latin America.

The main page and the talk page is originally in English,with translations in Dutch,French,Portuguese and Spanish(NOT YET).

Tosão (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Capital District

Hi Oaxaca dan,

Welcome back to Wikipedia! You are hereby invited to join WikiProject Capital District; your contributions would be much appreciated.

--Albany NY (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Oaxaca dan! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Art and Feminism Event in Bennington March 5

Hey! I wanted to let you know about an upcoming Art+Feminism event, at Bennington College on March 5: from 2-6 in the afternoon. It would be great to see some more Wikipedia editors at the event! Sign up here to let us know you will be attending! Sadads (talk) 02:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

^ Comscore tracked 26 million out of 63 million (41% reach) viewed Wikipedia sites in Latin America (June 2008)

[1] Comscore tracked 26 million out of 63 million (41% reach) viewed Wikipedia sites in Latin America (June 2008)

[1]