User talk:Oathswarm

Sorcerer/Sorceror

Hi Oathswarm, I wanted to ask you about your recent changes in Sorcerer and Sorceror. Given that many readers probably won't have any idea whether the article that they are looking for is spelled 'er' or 'or', I'm not sure how splitting off the misspelled versions into a separate page is helpful. Can you explain your reasoning? Leschnei (talk) 14:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If there are enough articles to justify listing the misspelling at the top the are enough for its own disambiguation page. Oathswarm (talk) 10:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ulster Protestant people

I did not create a new article. I added information to an existing page. All my information was factual.

You reversed all of it. Explain why you did this.

Campbellbeck1962 (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of your changes were sourced, which is especially important if you're accusing existing sources of WP:Bias

I never suggested you created a new article. Oathswarm (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

You have confirmed that Wikipedia is a BS source of information. You are biased. Oh my God, I didn't reference a newspaper article in a newspaper in Cork, Ireland in 1919!!! Disinformation; you are the joker. Sad case. You belittle and denigrate Wikipedia. I advice you to give thought to any further action that you think may be necessary: bigotry and your bias equals to censorship. You reversed "Roman Catholic" to catholic. Why? Do you not know your history. I will assure you that I will reference an article from a Cork, Ireland newspaper from 1919 in future!

Campbell Beck

Campbellbeck1962 (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, please do provide RS! Oathswarm (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Troublemaker

I will refer you to the those more experienced in matters of discipline. Totally, reversing my edit is very serious. Reviewing your "talk" history is revealing. Take care,

Campbell Beck Campbellbeck1962 (talk) 10:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you. Oathswarm (talk) 10:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What???? Did I write that was not factual? If you can't write, call me ************************. Campbellbeck1962 (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you. Oathswarm (talk) 11:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksandr Dugin

First of all why should I prove that Dugin isn't a fascist? It's you who should provide evidences, because your claim. As for why Dugin is clearly not a fascist, see this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSsIrcUS8JM

The claim is extensively sourced with reliable sources. Blanking does not help Oathswarm (talk) 10:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What reliable sources? There are media articles and a paper by an obscure student. I have provided the words of Dugin himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snate28 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:OR and WP:SELFPUB Oathswarm (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Egypt. Final warning for repeated addition of unsourced material (see article history). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 11:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]