User talk:Oanabay04/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Desire Page

I have Rv your edit. Wikipedia is not censored, and you censored a vebatim quote. Best wishes Lion King 18:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Are you romanian Oana?

-- Bonaparte talk 22:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Glad to meet you Oana :) I am happy for you please join our romanian noticeboard! Bonaparte talk 12:43, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Happy New Year Oana!

The link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board :) -- Bonaparte talk 12:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Articles on cartoon shorts

Hi, Oanabay04. I wanted to explain my recent reverts of your changes to Daffy Duck and Bugs Bunny. You removed the wikilinks (square brackets) from the titles of several cartoon shorts (for example, "Dripalong Daffy"). I reverted because there are several articles on such shorts on Wikipedia already, and there's no reason to suspect that the ones you removed are not valid subjects for articles of their own. See in particular Wikipedia:Build the web. Thanks, and I hope to run into you in the future! — BrianSmithson 14:10, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Transportation in NYC

Hello Oanabay - I noticed your work on the New York City Subway article. You might be interested in the Transportation in New York City sub article. It tells a fascinating story and it's been nominated to be a US Collaboration of the Week after lots of work over the last few weeks. Check it out and if you like it, please vote for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:USCOTW We need all the votes we can get! Wv235 04:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Wonderbug (TV series)

Thanks for your great additions to the Wonderbug (TV series) page I created. You've made good improvements. Travisl 15:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The Moon-Spinners

Hi, thanks for adding much excellent material to this article. Could you adjust the commentary to remove personal opinions? On a review website your critique would be welcome, but here we don't review works, we write Neutral point of view articles. This means that one can write about an Oscar-winning performance (or other awards that may have been won), or one highly praised by published critics, but not (for instance) "This boy is a potent source of comedy, without feeling like a forced element or hindering the plot." Even if it's true (and I'm sure it is) it is an expression of your opinion rather than something that can be verified as a fact. --Tony Sidaway 13:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Sourcing:

In this edit you added this link, which is dead. Can you provide a WP:RS to verify the death and circumstances thereof? Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Dates

Hi, I saw you changed the dates in the Sandy Denny article. For instance, januari 6 to 6 januari. If they are in between brackets "[[" you don't have to change dates, they will show up for each user depending on his or her preferences. See also here. I thought I'd mention it to you, saves you some work. Also, thanks for improving that article. Cheers, Garion96 (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please Please Me (album)

Thanks for cleaning up the grammer, it's appreciated. btw, if you've five spare minutes, you might want to look at Jimmy Nicol! Cheers--Patthedog 09:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I mean "grammar" of course (just testing)Ooops! And thanks for looking at Jimmy.--Patthedog 12:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

My pleasure. Anything I can do to clean up an article. Oanabay04 14:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4