User talk:OSTheRobot
Accusations of sockpuppetry
[edit]Hi OSTheRobot, as you've self-declared that you're a sock of some other account, I won't bother leaving a standard Welcome message, as I'm sure you've already seen it. In your few contribs, you've made several accusations that Dark Mistress is a sock of John254, Kristen Eriksen or Chester Markel or someone else. I took a quick look at the contribs of those accounts and I do not at all see behavior similarities that would suggest they're socks of DM. Could I ask you to please either file an SPI request, or stop making that accusation. Thanks... Zad68 16:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, I don't think I'll take you up on your offer. That you can't see the similarity between John254's over-the-top sexualized Kristen Eriksen sock, and his constant attempts to get Eric Corbett banned for incivility, and his rote cover-up automatic editing and the obvious sock Dark Mistress just makes you unfit to be an admin - don't worry, you're part of a large crew, that I, myself, am part of. OSTheRobot (talk) 17:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- OS if anything it would make me unfit to be a checkuser, which I'm not anyway. The subject area of interest is only one thing I looked at, there are other things that make for far stronger dissimilarities than matches, but per beans you know we shouldn't go into it here. If you've got a strong case, bring your diffs to SPI. If you won't stop making the accusation it'll end up at ANI. Choice is yours.
Zad6817:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- OS if anything it would make me unfit to be a checkuser, which I'm not anyway. The subject area of interest is only one thing I looked at, there are other things that make for far stronger dissimilarities than matches, but per beans you know we shouldn't go into it here. If you've got a strong case, bring your diffs to SPI. If you won't stop making the accusation it'll end up at ANI. Choice is yours.
- I think I'll get more traction when you send me to ANI for defending our long term content contributors from long term disruptive influences. Thanks so much for defending the rights of assholes to assault the encyclopedia in the name of fairness and civility! OSTheRobot (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- SPI is exactly the mechanism to handle what you're talking about. If your evidence for sockpuppetry is good, when you file the SPI, I will gladly admit I'm wrong in my assessment and I will be the first commenter in line to support a checkuser. That you claim to have good evidence but don't file the SPI tells me something.
Zad6817:36, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- SPI is exactly the mechanism to handle what you're talking about. If your evidence for sockpuppetry is good, when you file the SPI, I will gladly admit I'm wrong in my assessment and I will be the first commenter in line to support a checkuser. That you claim to have good evidence but don't file the SPI tells me something.
- No, it's not. SPI is where the plebeians have their checkusers done. I'm aiming higher. OSTheRobot (talk) 17:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Go for it... I think I'm done commenting here.
Zad6817:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Go for it... I think I'm done commenting here.
- I think you were done commenting when you first showed up to defend John254, but you just keep right keeping on with whatever you were doing. OSTheRobot (talk) 17:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)