User talk:ORCommsGalKayla

ORCommsGalKayla, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ORCommsGalKayla! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:The Octavian Report, from its old location at User:ORCommsGalKayla/sandbox/The Octavian Report. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

That's correct. User sandbox pages are not allowed to be filed in mainspace categories as if they were completed articles. As long as the page is in sandbox mode, you have to either leave categories off the page entirely, or include them only in disabled form (e.g. wrapped in nowiki tags, or typed with leading colons like [[:Category:X]]) so that they do not file the page in the category — the page is allowed to be categorized only when it actually gets moved into articlespace. Bearcat (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ORCommsGalKayla (talk) 21:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Octavian Report (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While I couldn't read the Financial Times behind its paywall, the other sources are either trivial passing mentions or not independent coverage. Going by the title, the FT doesn't promise more, but even if it were in-depth coverage of the Report, one good source still would not be enough to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Octavian Report and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Octavian Report, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Huon (talk) 20:53, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Hurowitz (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Hurowitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Hurowitz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Octavian Report

Hello, ORCommsGalKayla. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Octavian Report, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 01:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Hurowitz

Hello, ORCommsGalKayla. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Richard Hurowitz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Hurowitz

Hello, ORCommsGalKayla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Hurowitz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]