User talk:OCHS.OSH

Edit summary

Please fill out the edit summary when making changes so that other editors will understand why the changes are being made. We have to be able to distinguish between simple vandalism and the real thing. Particularly when one year changes are made to a fact as with the Twilight article. Slight changing of a year or other figure is a "cute" trick of vandals. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 22:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, OCHS.OSH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been deleted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then get me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that if more than one person is using this account to edit, then unfortunately it will be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 18:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jarry, yes, I do work for the museum, as you can tell from my username :-) We wanted to create a page since it is not in existence.

I'm not very knowledgeable with how this works with all the different steps. If regulations require someone to proof it, absolutely! How would I get someone to do that job for me?

OCHS.OSH (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC

I'll keep an eye on the page for you. Thanks for replying, my previous message was a pretty much generic one so don't be worried if it doesn't all apply to you. There are very firm rules, just be careful to write about the museum the way someone would write about it in a paper encyclopedia, for example. I can tell you now, Old Stone House Museum looks a lot better than most new page creations, so kudos for that! Continue to edit the article and improve it - maybe look at the articles about similar places and see how they do things. I'm going to be making some edits to the article soon to help you on your way - nothing major - but you might like to see what I've changed. You can do this by "watching" the page, then have a look at your watchlist. When you see an edit there, you can press "diff" to see what they've changed. Anyhow, happy editing, and please, let me know if you have any problems. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 16:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a general rule, I wouldn't use them if you can find better (and you normally can if you try hard enough!). If you can't find a better source, then I think that something is better than nothing. Less applicable for this article than others, but I wouldn't use them to back up controversial points either. Of course, you could always publish them! Regards, - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 17:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]