User talk:O794209
I am the fan of Xuanyi and there are someone cheating Xuanyi English name as Erhu, which are definitely not her English name. In my point of view, deleting such column is the proper way. If you do not agree with me, please make sure that there will be no such things happen anymore. Thank you.
November 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Mifter (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)- @Mifter: Hello, first thank you for adding page protection after my request.
- Now if can you revert this Since I'm blocked?
- I believe there is a 3RR Exemptions "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits, Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced..."--O794209 (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Hello and thanks for the note. I just took care of that revert and am taking a second look at your edits. For clarity, the full exemption to the three revert rule you are referencing is "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language." While replacing a name with "kfc" is in line with that, edits like this one and this one about formatting, this one regarding if we should include English names, and this one partly about genre as examples (there are others) are not covered by the exception as they are not obvious vandalism. If you have any other questions, I am happy to answer them. Best, Mifter (talk) 22:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Mifter: Instead of calling your proper name, I guess you wouldn't mind someone calling you something else out of blue? such As Kfc, or Erhu or just black out other's name? Still not obvious enough?--O794209 (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
O794209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
3RR Exemptions "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits, Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced..." O794209 (talk) 22:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Mifter quite ably explains above why your edits constituted edit warring. The block is valid; I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 02:26, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.