User talk:O.dvorak

O.dvorak, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi O.dvorak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AZair (September 20)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AZair.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! WJ (talk) 17:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on AZair

Hello, O.dvorak! I'm Ritchie333. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about AZair.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AZair. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Copernicus Emergency Management Service

Hello O.dvorak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Copernicus Emergency Management Service for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

–Ammarpad (talk) 05:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Copernicus Emergency Management Service

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Copernicus Emergency Management Service, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sam Sailor 19:23, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Copernicus Emergency Management Service

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Copernicus Emergency Management Service, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://emergency.copernicus.eu/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sam Sailor 19:25, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

O.dvorak, Sam Sailor, because of the claim that the content is suitably licenced, I've listed this at WP:CP instead of deleting it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The original website(s) now contain the copyleft notice as required by Wikipedia. I have made that clear on the Talk:Copernicus Emergency Management Service. Come on guys, it is no advertising... This is the service of the EU's Copernicus Programme, bringing high added value and very good data (for which one would normally pay a lot of money) to everyone, freely and openly. Also, this is one of six core Copernicus services - and at least two of the others already have their Wikipedia article and no one seemed to have a problem with it... O.dvorak (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this turns out to be not copyright violation, then clearly it's a promotion. And that either is not allowed. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not promotion. It is a description of a public (FREE!) service. One of 6 where other 2 already have a similar Wikipedia page!
Can you guarantee that the process of review (of the copyright issue) will ever end ? And when ? There is no progress indication for over a week now.
You can't mark it as "copyright issue" even if you already know it is NOT a copyright issue - just because you think it might be promotion. That is a clear abuse.

O.dvorak (talk) 09:52, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you on Facebook or any other kind of social media? Sam Sailor 19:27, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Copernicus EMS Activation EMSR177 - Amatrice Aerial, Grading Map, Aug 2016.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Copernicus EMS Activation EMSR177 - Amatrice Aerial, Grading Map, Aug 2016.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:16, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copernicus Emergency Management Service moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Copernicus Emergency Management Service, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Copernicus Emergency Management Service

Hello, O.dvorak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Copernicus Emergency Management Service".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 17:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Copernicus Emergency Management Service (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Justlettersandnumbers were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As it stands this does not meet our notability threshold for organisations. It seems to have only one independent source (#2); much of the text is inadequately sourced or completely unsourced. Some text is copied from here, which is suitably licenced and correctly attributed; however, there seems to be some taking from other pages of emergency.copernicus.eu which do not carry the same notice. Please clarify.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Copernicus Emergency Management Service and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Copernicus Emergency Management Service, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]