User talk:O.Turani

O.Turani, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi O.Turani! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

For your information

You have been mentioned as a possible sock on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Turan22 Edward321 (talk) 22:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Uzbeks

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Salom. Mana bu ssilka: larni Wikipediani inglizcha sahifasidagi Ozbeklar bolimiga quya olasizmi? Bular isbot talab qilib barcha ajdodlarimizni bu bolimdan olib tashlamoqdalar. KanishkaKagan (talk) 11:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

If you have the right to block, then block me.

Uzbeks article

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Uzbeks, you may be blocked from editing. All sources, including you own, show that these people were not Uzbeks. Edward321 (talk) 14:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Uzbeks, you may be blocked from editing. Edward321 (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

User;Edward321 I suggest you to stop your unrespectful action. What is concern? Who are you? Whatever you do, I am firm on claim and I don't stop until the end. If you have right, you can block me! I don't care very much.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Uzbeks. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Toddy1,If you or Edward321 has the right to block, then block me. I don't care too much about this issue. but I won't change my position about Uzeks Page.

January 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring, as you did at Uzbeks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bjelleklang - talk 23:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

• In light of the ongoing socking, edit warring, etc., I have extended your block to indefinite. Drmies (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)