User talk:O'erTheRampardos

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to List of Pokémon: Diamond & Pearl episodes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Captain panda 01:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cutie Honey the Live logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cutie Honey the Live logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chazz Princeton

This and the other GX articles were supposed to be merged per this AfD way back in January. JuJube (talk) 21:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The issue is honestly not very important to me. You can appeal the decision at WP:DRV if you like. JuJube (talk) 04:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:PKMNmovie12teaser.png

Thanks for uploading File:PKMNmovie12teaser.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chōkoku no Jikū e edit war

May I suggest that, instead of having an edit war over the title of by renaming and moving the article, you discuss the changes here first? At least a rational discussion will prevent any double redirects. MelicansMatkin (talk) 21:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chōkoku no Jikū he. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. The object of opening up a discussion is to discuss any potential changes before making them, not stating your point and then making the changes anyways. MelicansMatkin (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Death Note episodes

Hi, I would like to make you aware that marking "a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette, especially if the change involves the deletion of some text". Also, please provide edit summaries, for controversial edits in particular. More specifically, the 130,000 characters of text you repeatedly removed from List of Death Note episodes are being discussed at Talk:List of Death Note episodes#over concise non-encyclopedic Episode descriptions. Please engage in civil discussion with your fellow editors instead of trying to force the issue by edit warring. Regards, -- Goodraise (talk) 22:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy redirects

Please do not redirect Family Guy episode articles without discussing the merger on the talk pages. Thank you. --Captain Infinity (talk) 01:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of InuYasha: The Final Act episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of InuYasha: The Final Act episodes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing the official link to the site and stop trying to unhide episodes that have not aired yet. Just pointing to the Sunrise site does not mean anything. They have not aired yet, so they are not confirmed, and the Sunrise site does NOT list airdates for any of the episodes. Quit edit warring, and quit ignoring warnings and just copy/pasting them back to my talk page. If you disagree with the current practice, discuss it on the talk page, do not just keep stubbornly reasserting your preferences without any comment or reasoning. -- -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on List of Pokémon: Diamond and Pearl: Galactic Battles episodes. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. tedder (talk) 02:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You were already blocked for this crap before. How many more times are you just going to continue to try to do it? Stop unhiding episodes with no air dates available. The titles are already there for when dates are available. Stop Removing the warning about the English title. And stop trying to get around 3RR by hiding behind an IP - because its obvious and against policy. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at List of InuYasha: The Final Act episodes. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. tedder (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For continued edit warring after warning. tedder (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITS NOT VANDALISM, WHY ARE YOU CONSTANTLY REMOVING THOSE FACTS. I AM NOT VANDALIZING. — Preceding unsigned comment added by O'erTheRampardos (talk • contribs) 02:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

O'erTheRampardos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not vandalizing,I am helping out the page, Why does Collectonian constantly removing me helpful edits, as claiming its vandalism? I am not vandalizing.

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for vandalism, but for edit-warring. Your request seems to imply that, if unblocked, you would continue edit-warring, which means that the block is still necessary to avoid disruption of the encyclopedia. It might help you to familiarize yourself with both WP:EW and WP:DISPUTE before your block expires, so that you can participate more usefully in the future. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:26, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please compare my edits List of InuYasha: The Final Act episodes.

I haven't accused you of vandalism. Please read WP:EW, and note the above: "During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus." tedder (talk) 02:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not revert as vandalism. You have already been asked then warned repeatedly not to keep unhiding episodes for which we have no sourced airdates, but you continue to do so. You were invited to bring it up for discussion, but instead you just keep edit warring. You refuse to discuss, ignore all attempts to reason with you, and just continue going against the current consensus for how episode lists should work - only those with verifiable airdates are listed (and as Syobi does NOT have titles on those episodes, you cannot claim that as a source for those episodes airing; that is why they have a different background - they are unconfirmed; you must wait until they themselves have verified/confirmed the airdate). You were blocked for continuing to be disruptive and edit warring, including using an IP, after having been blocked for doing the exact same thing multiple times before. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be a discussion between me and Collectonian for this to end. (O'erTheRampardos (talk) 02:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

So, why haven't you discussed it at Talk:List of InuYasha: The Final Act episodes? That's where the guidelines to follow would be. This isn't about procedure and guidelines and what the page should look like, it's about edit warring.

Secondly, please stop using 'minor' to mark all of your edits as minor. tedder (talk) 02:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

This is what I was asking for all along. An RS for the next titles and keeping the note about not using anything other than the English titles. Much appreciated. Though I would recommend unchecking "mark edits minor by default" if you have that on. As Tedder noted above, if you are using that, it is causing you to misused the Minor edit mark. From the title of ep 26, looks like the predictions on it being 26 are dead on. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc on Dennō Senshi Porygon

I have started an RfC on the animation in Dennō Senshi Porygon. I am hoping that you will participate given the fact that you have been a part of past discussions. Thanks! -Marcusmax(speak) 22:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for continuing to mark all edits as minor. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. tedder (talk) 02:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

O'erTheRampardos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for three months for continuing to mark all edits as minor, what where does it say i can't mark my edits as minor. What is so disruptive about that? Have I gotten a warning about not doing that? No, I haven't. I administrator has not given me a warning about the reason he blocked me for. I want to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Are you going to stop marking all your edits as minor? The answer that will get you unblocked is "yes". --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There was never an "official" warning, though it looks like you've been told about this three times: 1, 2, 3. Do you indeed have "mark all edits as minor" unchecked in Special:Preferences now? If that's the case, I'll be glad to unblock. Jamie S93^❤ 17:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I'm sure you have read WP:MINOR, right? This is an escalation of previous disruption - on its own, it's not usually a huge deal. However, after being asked 3 times - plus the additional disruption - it became an escalation. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will stop marking all of my edits as "Minor". (O'erTheRampardos (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

This edit was still marked as minor- I'd encourage you to use this talk page as a sandbox to make sure you've fixed it. Do you need help on how to do it? tedder (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]