User talk:Nympho wiki

Nympho wiki

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Katy Perry discography, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rah rah bahb ^T 22:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inflation of certifications without sources... again

Lady Gaga articles reverted

You've been warned enough times, per your Talk Page history (deleting them from this page does not mean you haven't been warned).
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 12:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again to reiterate the warning above, inflating sales are not okay. Nymf _hideliho! 13:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: WTF

Here [1] you inflated The Fame from 2x platinum to 3x platinum. The source (RIAA database, as of 5 March 2010) provided still states 2x.
Here [2] you inflated The Fame Monster from gold to platinum. The source provided (RIAA database) lists only a gold certification.
You did the same thing regarding these certifications here [3], going against the source shown [4]

So until the RIAA increases the certifications, and these can be sourced within their database, do not change them. - eo (talk) 14:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lady gaga discography

No need for removal of Hungary single chart positions, other charted songs section in lady gaga discography . First you have to check the ref if it is unreliable then you remove, otherwise not.- Ashishvats23 (talk), 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Satellite certifications

Hi there. Thanks for your contribution to the article on "Satellite". However, triple gold is a higher certification in Germany than platinum (which equals double gold). Please don't exchange the lower certification for the higher one. Thanks. Janfrie1988 (talk) 21:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sales for Lady Gaga

Please see the talk page of Lady Gaga discography for this. It is not a reliable source as it is all based on her Twitter post. Nymf _hideliho! 22:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga discography

This is a very high-traffic page for a very high-profile artist. There are many editors involved with this, so please do not switch out music markets (SWE to SPA) without any explanation or without first discussing this on the Talk Page. There is already an ongoing discussion pertaining to the order of the countries, so please do not change any of them before that is resolved. - eo (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: Chillin' - please contribute here also: Talk:Lady Gaga discography#Singles. Thanks. - eo (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Guetta discography, you may be blocked from editing. you've been warned before about constantly adding spain to pages without discussion. stop doing it. Mister sparky (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Guetta discography

I just want to interject into the edit war you're having with Mister Sparky. You may not be aware but when it comes to discographies he's quite experienced. Not only has he experience in maintaining them to high standards he has also taken them to GA status which I suspect is what he wants to do with the Guetta discography. Rather than starting an edit war (I've informed him too) I strongly encourage you to engage in discussion. Finally I'd like to point out that we judge the importance of charts not always by how successful an artist is on them but rather by how much of a proportion of the music market in the world they make up. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 21:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As with the Lady Gaga discography article, you can't just switch out countries on a high-profile artist's discography page and then edit war if someone questions what you are doing. Take the issue to the Talk Page, please. One of the 11 columns in the albums table will have to be removed anyway. Here [5] you told Mister sparky to use the discussion page (on which he already started a discussion thread) and you did not take your own advice and contribute to it, and this edit summary [6] is not acceptable, nor is edit warring. - eo (talk) 22:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Born This Way

Please refer to Talk:Born_This_Way#Born_This_Way_sales before further changing of sales figures. Thank you. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 22:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Born This Way shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --TheJJJunk (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]