User talk:Nycutiepi

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Nycutiepi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rjd0060 (talk) 06:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Your recent edit to Focus on the Family (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 04:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Focus on the Family, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Focus on the Family was changed by Nycutiepi (u) (t) deleting 9191 characters on 2008-02-04T23:20:55+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to American Psychiatric Association constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Brandon_McLnerney.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Brandon_McLnerney.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon McInerney

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Brandon McInerney, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brandon McInerney

An article that you have been involved in editing, Brandon McInerney, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon McInerney. Thank you.

Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 20:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Love_Won_Out.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Love_Won_Out.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love won out.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Love won out.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ► 05:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Vote count

Exellent arguments. My concern, however, is that the list is quite lengthy and takes up a good percentage of the article. Have you considered putting in a paragraph along the lines of what you sent to me, ie, X number of democrats voted against the bill, including so and so...? Or have you condidered writing an article about the bill itself? If you'd like to revert my edit, I won't mess with it again. Thanks for writing. Czolgolz (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Dallas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Dallas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Dallas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:15, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]