User talk:Nurnord

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Kodiak Bear, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

About your changes, I have reverted part of them due to some problems with sources. Please notice that, on the "Size relative to other bear types", the text that you were modifying was not part of that article, but a literal quote from a U.S. Fish and Wildlife service website. If you have a source for the weight of 448 kg, please indicate it when changing the weight, as the current data of 477-534 kg is already sourced to a book and shouldn't be changed without updating the source. --Enric Naval (talk) 03:09, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Grizzly Rage. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Grizzly Rage. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You changed a sourced statement to something other than what the source says. As such, it has been reverted. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Grizzly Bear, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Your recent edit to the page Grizzly Bear appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. BC _{talk to me} 01:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bears

Your edits were reverted because your changes did not reflect the source cited. Pure and simple. If you make changes, and you know you are correcting an inaccuracy, make sure you also change the cited source. Don't just make the change and expect everyone to know that your new information is the correct information. PhD or no PhD, make sure your edits/changes are adequately cited by a reliable source; otherwise, your edits are considered "original research", which is not permitted in Wikipedia. BC _{talk to me} 22:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nurnord. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nurnord. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]