User talk:Nurefsan

A clean nice but empty user talk page :(

Fetullah Gulen

Please do not reinstate the old, sourced, but unreliable sourced highly positive point of view version of Fetullah Gulen. This has been discussed before (frequently) and the consensus is that the longer version is no good. Change of that opinion has to be achieved on the talk page before it can be implemented. Thanks Arnoutf (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace the Gulen page again. On the Gulen talk page there is a list of 5 reasons why that version is not acceptable, and an argument why your edit summary is unreasonable. I will consider any further replacements of the current texts before agreement has been reached on ALL 5 points on the talk page as vandalism. Arnoutf (talk) 08:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry report

By your mode of operation it is now clear to me you are a sockpuppet of Philscirel. Being a strong believer in assuming good faith I really hoped this was not the case.

I have filed a report here, you can give your point of view (defense) if you want to.

Arnoutf (talk)

The sockpuppetry case is still open. I noticed that you have not denied that you are the same person as Philscirel. Does that mean you admit that you are actually Philscirel? Arnoutf (talk) 18:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. .

Yo have been reported for edit warring for your 4th revert today. This is the 18th revert on this topic over all. You can respond here. Arnoutf (talk) 23:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on Fethullah Gülen. It is essential that you are more careful to discuss controversial changes with the user in question, rather than simply revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 23:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nurefsan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been working on Fethullah Gülen article for a while. Arnoutf (talk) is vandalizing the page by blanking verified information, deleting more than 50 reliable sources and references, s/he is adding incorrect falsified information to the article deliberately. An example can be found in these logs. The islamineurope link is added completely out of context. S/he do not accept my continuous requests for a discussion [1]. See the discussion page too: although we worked on portion of the article for neutralization, s/he stopped collaboration and started an edit war. As far as I know, reverting a vandalism does not violate 3rr. Thanks. Nurefsan (talk) 06:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you reverted was not obvious vandalism. See also WP:NOTTHEM. Sandstein 07:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philscirel Black Kite 17:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]