User talk:Number9060862

Welcome!

Hello, Number9060862, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! hmssolent\Let's convene 03:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Figlio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rick Figlio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. hmssolent\Let's convene 03:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Sevi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Sevi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Sevi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OlYeller21^Talktome 05:59, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BURDEN

Cite the source clearly and precisely (specifying page, section, or such divisions as may be appropriate). You adding a name of an newspaper article and just saying 1968 isn't cutting it. If you aren't able to cite the source propery, then don't use it. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. I will find more specifics on the 1968 article before citing it again. I have paper copy but the exact date and page number are not legible. The newspaper publisher should be able to get it for me. Number9060862

From what I've seen, you may not need it. I'm not seeing anything that is unique to that article that the other sources you're using are unable to cover. I'd hate to see you spend a lot of time getting the info for something that is already duplicated. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Bamyers99. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jason Gonzalez without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Bamyers99 (talk) 21:23, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

William L. “Corn Pop” Morris moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, William L. “Corn Pop” Morris, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 00:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William L. “Corn Pop” Morris has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William L. “Corn Pop” Morris. Thanks! Loksmythe (talk) 00:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William L. “Corn Pop” Morris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William L. “Corn Pop” Morris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William L. “Corn Pop” Morris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spicy (talk) 13:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]