User talk:Nullleft

Hello

Please use this page to discuss anything you deem important--Nullleft (talk) 19:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Khaled (musician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know a thing or two about wiki edting M.Bitton, but I assumed that all my contributions were sourced, which is what matters right ?

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Leftowiki per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leftowiki. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 03:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nullleft (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't even use courtsey in my speaking, ARE YOU INSANE ?! WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THAT I AM THE SAME PERSON WITH THE OTHER GUY THIS WIKI THING IS LOOKING MORE AND MORE LIKE THE NOVEL 1984 Nullleft (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Shouting won't help you, nor will a lack of courtesy. The evidence is in the sockpuppet investiagtion linked above. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 19:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CAN YOU SHOE ME THE "EVIDENCE" BECAUSE I CHECKED THE PAGE AND I SAW NONE O Still Small

Tell you something though, the easiness with which you block someone without evidence and then just prevent them from talking to you and speaking in an echo chamber, is worthy of the ministry of truth in 1984 and the reason of my tone is that this whole thing is outrageous and authoritarian

give editing power to some "nice benvolous people" and see what happens O Still Small Voice of Clam 19:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)}}[reply]

Mz7 since i checked the page and saw no evicence, and since your action is the source of my trouble, can you inform me why you blocked me ?