User talk:Ntutak

Tom Wright (theologian)

I noticed you removed an external link to ntwrites.com from the Tom Wright page this morning - curious why and what the determination is for what links are kept and removed. Thanks.

I am fairly new to Wikipedia, so the rule about no blogs and no forums came about before I got here. In answer to your question: you can read it at Wikipedia:External links. Oh, and by the way, welcome to Wikipedia! --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sanktifunctafyd

I have nominated Sanktifunctafyd, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanktifunctafyd. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanktifunctafyd

A tag has been placed on Sanktifunctafyd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eartube Empire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eartube Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eartube Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]