User talk:Nthidontknow

Welcome!

Hello, Nthidontknow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chailie Ho, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb (talk) 05:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chailie Ho

The article Chailie Ho has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ttonyb (talk) 05:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chailie Ho, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chailie Ho, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. ttonyb (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chailie Ho

Please stop reverting the edits to the article. They are intended to make the article more encyclopedic like. The removal of fluff and unrelated refs is outlined in WP:MOS. If you continue you may be banned from editing or creating articles. ttonyb (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chailie Ho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Quit making unencyclopedic changes to the article. ttonyb (talk) 05:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chailie Ho, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ttonyb (talk) 05:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Chailie Ho

I have nominated Chailie Ho, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chailie Ho. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nthidontknow for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 05:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked 1 week for sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:42, 19 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nthidontknow for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 15:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 2 weeks, for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 18:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]