User talk:Nsaum75/Archives/2010/November

Syrian town depopulation - allegations of "ethnic cleansing"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Syrian_towns_and_villages_depopulated_in_the_Arab-Israeli_conflict#Ethnic_cleansing

You argued against this page once, any chance of budging this stupid see also link? I don't know if I have the right arguments. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.41.85 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

hello friend!

I have posted new pictures on my blog :D how are you doing? saludos!!!MarioAlvarez05 (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Quick thanks

As a courtesy: thanks for signing my post (d'oh...) VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Notice

If you continue to disrupt and make broad attacks against editors, as you have done at the PI Arbitration discussion, you may find yourself blocked or reported for disruptive behavior. You are not doing your side any favors. Consider yourself put on notice. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet much? This kind of underhanded behavior is exactly why I stopped editing IP articles or contributing photos to things in the middle east. --nsaum75^{¡שיחת!‎} 18:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Really now? It seems like your comments there are being ignored and an admin even castigated you for your disruptive comments after it was decided Prop 3 was the consensus winner. I think you would be best served if you chose to edit somewhere where you can keep your POV in check. Just friendly advice. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

complete

Yes, we are done with WP. They are now working on their semester projects which will be presentations. I will get back to tidying some of the articles up later, when the semester is done. Thanks!Thelmadatter (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Ahmed Yassin

Hello, You reverted an edit from an IP address to Ahmed Yassin that had added the phrase "and the spiritual leader" to a seemingly hidden part of a reference. You called the edit "vandalism". If you are correct, it is vandalism of an unusually subtle variety. Can you elaborate on this, so that I can understand this sort of thing better? Thank you very much. Cullen328 (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Reversion was based not on the spirituality addition, but on the blanking of the entire section on alleged terrorist attacks that was sourced. If you scroll down the page, you will see it. --nsaum75^{[[User talk:nsaum75|¡שיחת!&lr}

Thank you. Sorry for being a bit slow. Cullen328 (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Happens to the best of us. Have a good weekend!. --nsaum75^{¡שיחת!‎} 23:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Vandalismo

Per this, I reported them to AIV as you had already warned them several times. Saludos --nsaum75^{¡שיחת!‎} 10:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much, he love to attack me, so it's normal to see my page blanked. Happy Thanksgiving Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 18:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Za'atar

Your arguments at Za'atar are disruptive and unhelpful. Your personal attacks and battlefield mentality towards those who support the World View and Wikipedia policy will not continue to be tolerated. If you continue to disrupt the discussion with POV and "alternative suggestions" that go against policy, enforcement action may be necessary. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Nsaum, don't waste your time on a likely sock of a banned user--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)