User talk:Nsaum75/Archives/2009/February

Leon Toubin

As you voted on this article per its Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Toubin (2nd nomination), please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Toubin (3rd nomination). Bhaktivinode (talk) 01:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I recommend you go read WP:CANVASS. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I have included my thoughts on this specific instance in my response on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Toubin (3rd nomination). --Nsaum75 (talk) 01:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

recent change to the ciprofloxacin page

I appreciate your recent edit but do you think it to be approriate to add a picture that promotes a particular brand named drug? I would assume that was not your intention, but that is the final result. Would you not agree that the article should remain free of any free advertisment for the various manufacturers?Davidtfull (talk) 09:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Greetings. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Its not a brand name version of the drug, rather the name Ciprofloxacino is the name of the generic in Mexico. In selecting a photo, I tried to select one that didn't display any brand names or logos. The purpose of the photo was to show an example of the medication itself and its common packaging. Precidence exists, as there are similar photographs of medications and packaging in articles about other antibiotics such as Amoxicillin and even the common analgesic Acetaminophen. I reviewed the photo, and realized it wasn't clear from subtitle that Ciprofloxacino is the Spanish translation of Ciprofloxacin, and therefore have changed it. Does that help to address your concerns? I am open to further suggestions and discussion. --Nsaum75 (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I believe that it does as the senior editor of that page moved the photo to a different location on the page rather than remove it. As such I would assume there is no further problem here. Appreciate your co-operation and willingness to make these minor changes.Davidtfull (talk) 09:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to assume that was an error on your part.

Please keep an eye on what you're reverting, okay? HalfShadow 07:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

I was in the process of rolling back several vandal edits, when you reverted one of my rollbacks :-) The page has now been reverted to the original version prior to the edits by the IP and Supa jew. No harm done, we were both quick to the fix. --Nsaum75 (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)