User talk:Nroosovsky

This is Nroosovsky's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:David Christopher has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Christopher. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your comment / review! I am unable to view the original article itself that you sent as being previously deleted. I am completely unsure if they are the same person.

Thank you again! Nroosovsky (talk) 06:59, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Christopher (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Christopher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 08:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nroosovsky! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 08:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Christopher (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Christopher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Christopher (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See previous deletion discussion. This draft has been reference-bombed, but does not speak for itself as to why the subject is notable when he was not notable in 2020.

This draft has been reference-bombed. The reviewer has not checked all of the references and should not be required and is not required to check all of the references. If the author wishes to have some of the references evaluated in review of this draft, please specify, in AFC comments, which of the references are key. Please specify not less than three nor more than five. This draft will not be reviewed further until the author identifies the key references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Christopher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and feedback.

Numerous edits have been made and discussed. My question, how is it referenced bombed? I'm adding a citation for each piece of information I have deemed relevant, which was a task directly asked of me.
I do not understand why the previous attempt to make an article is relevant to the article at hand. The previous deletion is inadequate in reason to deny this submission, and seems to be your primary commentary from previously and in your review. His notability in 2020 is inconsequential. The topic at hand is his current notability and contributions, of which multiple are cited. He is an established tv personality with his own company that has been recognized and acknowledged by multiple major publications (i.e. Elle, various credible news platforms, and a Museum). I am confused how that is not note worthy, and would love further explanation that is not centered around a previous deletion, of which I knew nothing of in the first place, prior to your inquiry. That being said, and in continued reference to your past commentary in specific regard to the article's references, you yourself said that this article was "superior to the previous draft" in specifically referencing. How does that then equate to what you are now saying?
In regard to notability, purely citing his most recent reality show appearance, we can find a multitude of "reality stars" throughout the Wikipedia database. An example of which being Molly Mae, who is known almost solely for her time on Love Island UK. Even without the multiple references to culture significance within the entertainment world, I am confused in how his time on Amazon's "Cosmic Love" is not sufficient when equal achievement has been sufficient for other notable individuals.

Please allot me these clarifications so that I may then proceed in rectifying the aforementioned mistakes and move forward with the hopeful acceptance of my article. Thank you. Nroosovsky (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://viewer.joomag.com/coach-player-magazine-summer-2017/0989322001500920994?page=37

https://www.elle.com/culture/movies-tv/a40720922/cosmic-love-prime-video-trailer-cast/

https://www.blurb.com/bookshare/app/index.html?bookId=9619000#

https://www.ocweekly.com/punk-frontman-david-christopher-reveals-his-new-hip-hop-solo-career-6822841/

https://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwtv/article/Finale-of-ANGEL-CITY-HEROES-Webseries-to-Air-Next-Week-20190911 Nroosovsky (talk) 08:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Christopher (January 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sources are either not reliable or promotional fluff.

S0091 (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Christopher

Hello, Nroosovsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Christopher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Christopher

Hello, Nroosovsky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Christopher".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]