User talk:Npsaltos62

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Moore

Hi. I reverted your addition to the Patrick Moore article because it lacked a reliable source, and included an opinion. A Wikipedia article shouldn't include commentary like "This Orwellian revision of history is deeply disturbing to defenders of free speech", especially not done in Wikipedia's voice. If you found a high-quality source that described it in this terms, you might be able to include it as an opinion expressed by (named person). Guettarda (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand now. I will find proper sources and remove the opinion. Sorry about that. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and got a little frustrated. Npsaltos62 (talk) 15:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Your recent editing history at Patrick Moore (consultant) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bradv🍁 15:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Greenpeace; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bradv🍁 15:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand now. I will find proper sources and remove the opinion. Sorry about that. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and got a little frustrated. Thanks. Npsaltos62 (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Npsaltos62 reported by User:Bradv (Result: ). Thank you. Bradv🍁 15:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand now. I will find proper sources and remove the opinion. Sorry about that. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and got a little frustrated. Npsaltos62 (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Npsaltos62, thank you. If you have a reliable source for the assertion that Greenpeace removed Moore from their website on a particular date, please present your evidence on the talk page of the article with what text you would like to add. The rest of your edit is original research, which is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Please feel free to ping me if you need help. Bradv🍁 16:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Patrick Moore (consultant), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Praxidicae (talk) 15:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand now. I will find proper sources and remove the opinion. Sorry about that. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and got a little frustrated. Npsaltos62 (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating the three revert rule on Greenpeace and attacking other editors on Patrick Moore (consultant). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will unblock as soon as I get an agreement that you will not repeatedly revert other editors or call them names, and you agree that if you do this, you can be reblocked by any administrator. I realise you have apologised above, but I think I need assurances this won't happen again. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. BTW, I did not realize that I was in an edit war with Senior Editors, I actually thought I was being punked by an individual. Once I checked my email and saw all of the comments from editors I realized my mistake. I promise you this will NEVER happen again. Npsaltos62 (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, there is no such thing as a "senior editor" - everybody is equal, and the only reason the other editors didn't get blocked is because none of them reverted enough times for sanctions to be applicable. Anyway, unblocked, with the proviso above. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-added with sourcing sans commentary. Buffs (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Npsaltos62!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,278,919 registered editors!

Hello, Npsaltos62. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 03:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neil Jason, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joe Jackson and Bob James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Intimate partner violence. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Crossroads ^-talk- 15:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hi Npsaltos62. Thanks for the contribution you've made to the page What'll I Do. Unfortunately, some of the references appear to breach Wikipedia's policy on copyright. I've removed the section and started a discussion on the talk page: please feel free to contribute to the discussion there so we can work towards using your hard work to improve the article. Regards, ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Bridge on the River Kwai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In any event, the information you added is already discussed in the Music section of the article. DonIago (talk) 07:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your edit to God Bless America has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 18:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Blackburn Twins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Blackburn Twins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blackburn Twins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 21:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Tonight Show Starring Steve Allen episodes (1954) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of The Tonight Show Starring Steve Allen episodes (1954), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Selah Strong (soldier)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Selah Strong (soldier) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Singularity42 (talk) 02:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at Selah Strong (soldier). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Marty Robbins has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selah Strong (soldier) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Selah Strong (soldier), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Npsaltos62,

I moved this article to Draft space as an alternative to deleting it completely. It has a lot of problems that need to be fixed. Please submit it to AFC when you think it is ready to be reviewed. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Culper Ring

added a link pointing to Anna Strong

Selah B. Strong

added a link pointing to Anna Strong

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of The Tonight Show Starring Steve Allen episodes (1954)

Hello, Npsaltos62. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of The Tonight Show Starring Steve Allen episodes (1954), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of The Tonight Show Starring Steve Allen episodes (1954)

Hello, Npsaltos62. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of The Tonight Show Starring Steve Allen episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sholem Aleichem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Richardson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jack Posobiec, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CUPIDICAE💕 17:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to speak up.

That article is pure hatred.

No journalistic integrity.

Purely volatile invective.

Slanted political opinions are dripping from every word.

Do you truly lack self-awareness?

Disgusting, Disgusting, Disgusting, Disgusting.

Your day is coming. The world is not taking this crap any longer.

Wikipedia is DEAD. NPsaltos62 (talk) 17:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think I care about your warnings to me?

Conversely, you should REALLY CARE about the message I am delivering to you.

Grow up, you childish, petulant, globalist drone.

There is no originality, critical thinking or open-minded acceptance of opposing opinions. You are driving our society directly into the evils of authoritarian control. No debate means no originality.

No life.

No expression.

No art.

No future.

STOP bullying people who you are taught to disagree with.

STOP labeling them with over-used epithets.

It is pure propaganda. NPsaltos62 (talk) 17:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your commentary doesn’t belong in articles, do it again and you can expect a block. CUPIDICAE💕 18:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have inserted my commentary if YOU HADN'T reversed my attempt to clean up the monstrosity that currently exists in that page.

My edits were reversed.

That was unethical.

I was trying to soften the language of your prior author(s).

Wikipedia needs to take a deeper dive into self-awareness.

Stop promoting and protecting Leftist/Globalist/Authoritarian opinions.

Stop canceling conservative opposition to your propaganda.

I(we) am(are) only trying to HELP you.

Why do you punish people who are trying to HELP you?

Very, very, very strange.

Authoritarian propaganda rules at Wikipedia.

This MUST CHANGE!!! NPsaltos62 (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I and, I'm sure everyone else on Wikipedia are not interested in your delusional diatribe, so go make your argument at ANI as I've proposed an indefinite block of your account. CUPIDICAE💕 19:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.CUPIDICAE💕 18:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 19:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Selah Strong (soldier)

Hello, Npsaltos62. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Selah Strong (soldier), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]