User talk:Noviscum

hmm?!?!--Pedro 21:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are a vandal Pedro. I ask for your blocked. Noviscum 21:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The best defense is an attack. É como digo... pior sou eu em te responder. Não sou racista! Disse factos. --Pedro 21:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
read this: Gitanos and this Flamenco. the racist is you, against gypsies. --Pedro 21:48, 14 August

That is the opinion of Pedro about the spaniard in the discusion about Salvage Island

"that's about the waters, not the islands - the islands are no sphere! Portugal has no problems with no country! it just has Olivenza because our neighbours are like gypsies, not because of gypsie culture of Southern Spain, but because it invades other people's property: Spain = Turkey part II 1/2 (as in Cyprus) - and still Portugal does nothing. See, it even respects those who doesnt deserve it, in my opinion, that's because we have chilcken and monkeys insted of politicians, but that's another issue. " Pedro

For Pedro: Spain=gypsies=thieves. That is racism about the spaniards and the gypsies.

Please Pedro, don´t talk in my discussiom page anymore. Noviscum 08:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

o unico vandalo aqui és tu, tu não bates é bem da cabeça, agradecia que paraces de enviar mensagens!--Pedro 11:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Olha, Noviscum. Não venhas dizer que eu não percebo espanhol. Percebo a 100%. Acho que tu é que não percebes espanhol. Naquele link não diz nada sobre a soberania das ilhas (a terra!). Fala sobre as águas. Mas aquilo já tinhamos visto. Não diz nada sobre a terra. Tens que ler com olhos de ler, porque a questão são as águas. As ilhas não têm muito valor, mas sim as águas. Tens que ler o texto sobre essa perspectiva. Aquilo fala claramente que para Espanha, as águas em volta das canárias são importantes para Espanha, tal como são para Portugal. Para a Espanha desputar o territorio das ilhas tinha que ter motivos históricos, o que como é obvio não tem. A Espanha disputa que sejam ilhas, é uma técnica conhecida e usada em outras situações para obter controlo sobre as águas territoriais. Acho que o problema é que não sabes ou ouviste falar nesta situação. Eu como gosto de ilhas, e principalmente estas que são pequenas 8que dão a sensação de uma ilha verdadeira) tenho acompanhado o assunto. Aqui está o motivo da Espanha e Portugal: http://gasa.dcea.fct.unl.pt/infozee/images/3.3.1.jpg vê a quantidade de ZEE que Portugal tem só por causa das selvagens. Percebes agora?! Não digo que não seja impossível, mas é pouco provavel. A Espanha quer que as Selvagens sejam como Perejil. Tens que arranjar outro texto que fale da terra ou as proprias ilhas. O problema é que estás fora de contexto, e percebeste mal. --Pedro 00:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Savage Islands

Saw you comments on the Village Pump . I can not block Pedro as you requested. However I've rewritten the article in a way which I believe is neutral and which trys to represent both points of view to reach a neutral point of view. Please take a look at it and make any suggestions you'd like for further improvements. If you'd prefer, you may make them on my talk page. Best wishes - Williamborg (Bill) talk 02:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Savage Islands. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

This commentary was made by Pedro because I show in the dicusion about Savage Islands that he Pedrowas adding fake information.Noviscum 16:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are large areas of Brazil Spanish speaking?

I am a little confused. According to the Spanish language map large sections of Brazil are Spanish speaking. If this is true you should change the Portuguese map and show the Spanish speaking areas. If it is not then please let the Spanish language page know.

I love learning Portuguese! Check out and put a watch on my user page and talk page.

learnportuguese 21:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Noviscum! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 49 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Loquillo (singer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ámbitos

The article Ámbitos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local journal, apparently not indexed anywhere. No indication that this meets WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 18:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]