User talk:Novidmarana/Jin Jing

hello

Hello, Novidmarana. Thanks for your message. I'm a fan of Jin Jing. But I understand the policy of wikipedia. I will write a NPOV article on her with other users. A point is that the opinion of Chinese propaganda is not the reason to reject the information from Chinese media. wikipedia is not the judge. We need to show the information from both sides, Chinese media and Western media. I also want to more people to read the article on Jin Jing. I also think such motivation is not the reason for a person like you to reject the edition by a fan like me. Everyone has his or her own opinion. The point is that the article needs to be NPOV, and that's the only point for wikipedia.--Jingandteller (talk) 18:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Jin Jing

When you start to edit the article on Jin Jing, whatever your opinion is, this Chinese athlete has started to occupy your mind. I guess you will never forget this Chinese name Jin Jing. It's good. Thank you for keeping her in your mind for many years and editing the article for wikipedia. I'm a fan of Jin Jing. Let's work together to improve the article.--Jingandteller (talk) 03:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

On the agent provocateur theory

I made a explanation on why the blog you cited does not qualify to be included in the Jin Jing article. See its talk page. Helloterran (talk) 04:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Jin Jing

Thanks for your help with editing the Jin Jing article. Some of the editors on this article seem more like CCP propogandists than Wiki editors. Oiboy77 (talk) 07:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Jin Jing. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 05:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk17 06:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Civility

Regarding [1], among others: Could you please read Wikipedia:Civility? Thanks. Novidmarana (talk) 00:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

In English "Save the advice of reverts to yourself and don't read my comments if you don't understand. My last comment was not intended for you anyways." is considered quite rude. And if you perceive a comment by another user as a rude, than that is simply not an excuse. And frankly, the other user was not even uncivil. So keep it cool and civil. Novidmarana (talk) 03:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I agree that it is not an excuse that i should say something rude simply because i perceive a comment by another user rude. I'll try to keep cool and frankly i have been cool not to violate 3PR so far unlike other users and i have changed my comment. But obviously we have different perception on what is being rude. In Chinese tit for tat is fair play. Take care.Cowboybebop98 (talk) 13:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC))

your recent reverts on Jin Jing

I think I need to remind you that you actually broke the rule of 3RR if you do a bit math. Vandalism is not a good excuse as they gave their reason (no matter how you interpret the reason) and i don't think people not contributing this article will consider them vandalism. If you really need to revert more than 3 times within 24 hours, wait for somebody else. Be cool. --Cowboybebop98 (talk) 13:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

getting tired?

how much did you do? the see also section is useless and should be removed.--Jingandteller (talk) 16:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

your spelling

her name is Jin Jing. be careful when you spell the name. ok? you always spell the word in a wrong way.--Jingandteller (talk) 21:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Haha, I interpreted it as a way around the difficulty of pronouncing Velar nasal, although I don't know why it is difficult. But I am OK with it. --Cowboybebop98 (talk) 03:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

3R violation on Jin Jing article

Please have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Zhenqinli_reported_by_User:Oiboy77_.28Result:_.29 your comments would be invaluable.Oiboy77 (talk) 08:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

you are such a low person

1. 17:52, 5 May 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Oiboy77‎ (→Jin Jing, once again: new section) (top)
2. 17:52, 5 May 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jingandteller‎ (→Jin Jinu: new section) (top)
3. 17:52, 5 May 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Dassiebtekreuz‎ (→Jin Jing: new section) (top)
4. 17:52, 5 May 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Helloterran‎ (→Jin Jing: new section) (top)
5. 17:52, 5 May 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Yunfeng‎ (→Jin Jing: new section)
6. 17:51, 5 May 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:HongQiGong‎ (→Jin Jing, once again: new section) (top)

you are so boring.--Jingandteller (talk) 11:05, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Haha, somehow I think he is teasing you. Not a big deal, relax, :-). --Cowboybebop98 (talk) 21:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you are low or boring. Keep up the good work. Yunfeng (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

re:Personal attack

So, tell me, why did you write the wrong name on purpose?--Jingandteller (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

On purpose? Why? And what's your problem with typos? And why do you attack other editors? And why instead of apologizing you are coming here with counter questions? Novidmarana (talk) 21:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Did you do that on purpose? Yes. Why? Look at the history of your edition. So, tell me, what's your problem with typos? And why do you attack Jin Jing? And why instead of apologizing you are coming here with counter questions? --Jingandteller (talk) 23:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

revert

If you want to keep the see also section, we can talk in the talk page. But you should not revert all my other editions without any explanation. --Jingandteller (talk) 08:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually, you are the one who keeps reverting against consensus and without any explanations. And guess what, I will revert all your edits as long as your are unwilling to enter the debate and explain your position. Note that asking a counter question to a question is not an explanation, although I don't know why I am saying that, should be clear to anyone. Novidmarana (talk) 21:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

See also

• Chinese nationalism
• Fenqing
• Internet in the People's Republic of China
• Media of the People's Republic of China
• Paralympic sports
• Propaganda in the People's Republic of China
• Sports in China

You want to keep this section and I want remove it. I put it back to the article and we can talk in talk page before we remove it.--Jingandteller (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Read the talk page before, this has been discussed countless times. And contrary to you I and other editors have explained the reasons why this section needs to be in the article. Novidmarana (talk) 21:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

countless? so funny.--Jingandteller (talk) 23:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

your personal attack on Jin Jing has been removed

Don't do that any more. --Jingandteller (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

You seriously need to learn what you can do and what not here on Wikipedia and that inlcudes that you cannot remove comments from the talk page as you repeatedly did. Novidmarana (talk) 21:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

You did the same thing. You also removed some comments from the talk page repeatly. --Jingandteller (talk) 23:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

If you don't reply, I will keep removing your attack on Jin Jing, just as you removed comments from the talk page before.--Jingandteller (talk) 23:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I removed an attack on me, and that is completely different from an attack on a third person (although the word imbecile is a rather factual description of her statements given after the incident staged by the PRC in Paris). Learn the difference between a personal attack and a statement about a third person, and stop attacking me as you did already two times. Novidmarana (talk) 00:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

good for you to remove fenqing

--Jingandteller (talk) 23:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)