Hello, Novickas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! . P.S. you might want to take a look at WP:LITH. Renata22:12, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you are doing a truly excellent job! No need to apologize for anything (I am not even sure what are you apologizing for). We really badly need someone with native grasp of English. I myself make tons of mistakes and I would love if someone could clean it up. I set up the reference in the cuisine section. It's pretty simple once you get the hang of it. A little tip: to automatically sign your name just type 4 of these ~ (like this: ~~~~). If you need some help, just drop me a note, I will be happy to assist. I know that at first Wikipedia looks like a scary jungle of rules and policies, technical stuff and weird formating conventions. My talk page is here. See ya around! Renata01:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! How are you? I noticed that you edited article Lithuanians with this particular sentence - Perhaps as a result of the shortages, the Lithuanians... - AFAIK Lithuanians do not suffer from any shortages or maybe I understand something wrongly? BTW, you have very nice copy/edit skills. M.K.13:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for very quick answer. Yes indeed in soviet era were shortages. I initially thought that you talking about present times:). in this case, yes it would be better to add a note <during soviet era> M.K.14:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC) P.S. More convenient place to leave the comments is user’s discussion page (second button on top) instead of the main one (first button).[reply]
do nothing and leave red link to someone else to take care of
don't link anywhere, remove the [[ ]] and pretend there is no need for such article.
What to do really depends on your personal preferences. All are fine, but 1 and 3 are most common.
Stub is a short article that could and should be expanded. The whole long thing is on Wikipedia:Stub. Officially, there is no such thing as "sub-stub." There was a proposal a long time ago, but it died. I just like the idea of it and find it useful. It is a class of stubs that are extremely short (1-3 sentences). See also article grading scheme. Hope that answers, Renata16:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, images. See, "Wikipedia-only" permison in not acceptable because Wikipedia is free (as in everybody can copy its content) and wants to remain such. So if you ask someone, you need to ask to release the image under GFDL, which means that anybody else can use the image for any purpose (note that "any" also includes commercial, and that stops most people). I don't have a lot of experience asking sites for permissions and I don't think there are any that granted "blanket" permissions, but what I gather is that most people don't really know copyrights and are quick to grant "Wikipedia-only." In short, it's quite messy. Easiest and cleanest way is to take pics yourself and release under some free license.
Quick tip: if you want to intent a para don't put a spece in front of
Hello! I am here again. I know it is not very nice to disturb people, but maybe you would be interested to look here too User:M.K/Laikinas? It is upcoming article in mine work space, i ma not sure is it not contain any writing errors, so I want to correct them prior launching them in proper place. M.K.19:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome back from holydays, I hope you had a good time. While I have no specific task, but we have plenty of work in general :) As you know we run this project, here you could find the articles which needing copy/edit, expansion or request of new articles etc, so just pick up some articles by your taste and to work! M.K.20:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, since you are looking for job, could you please take a look at my draft of History of Lithuania located here. I know that only about a third of the article is finished, but I would like to know that everything is fine with it. Also, if something is confusing unclear or looks irrelevant, let me know. I want the article to be as good as it gets :) Renata00:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the question! That's because GDL reached the Black Sea after 1400, while the article deals with a bit earlier period. But I agree, it needs clarification. Anything else? Please be as picky as you can :) Renata15:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I am really in no hurry, there is no chance I am going to finish it up till next weekend. Thanks for the notes. I know it needs more maps, pictures, timelines and all the other nice things. But that's for later, when the text will be finished. Also the lead will have to be adjusted quite a bit once the text is finalized.
The long coins are really long. And they are not really coins. That's just something people used in trade. Here is a pic.
As for the orders, it's really tedius to name them every time... But thanks again! You vocabularly is far more advanced than mine ;) Renata21:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have little quotable geographic information on Aukštojas at hand right now. Its general orientation is south-east from Vilnius but it is by no means exact by compass. At the age of perhaps 9-10 years, I visited Juozapinė Hill as a member of the group of cyclists who went from the Cathedral Square in Vilnius to Juozapinė Hill. I was assigned the task of carrying some soil from the center of Vilnius (perhaps from the hill of the Gediminas Castle, I can't remember now) in a little decorated bag and spilling it at Juozapinė. As the then-unnamed-and-uknown Aukštojas is near Juozapinė, the overall picture was boring beige hills with little prominence. I'll perhaps do a cycling trip sometime to take the picture of Aukštojas just for the record.
BTW, what part of the US are you from? I spent a couple of weeks during my honeymoon this summer in Utah. Enjoyed every moment! Also visited Las Vegas, New York and northern Arizona. We two had a great roadtrip by car all by ourselves. I was particularly amazed by the real mountains that I saw for the first time in my life spent in the Lithuanian flatlands.Juozas Rimas21:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding Migūnai forestry and Aukštojas Hill: I have no information on the forestry, just took the information from http://www.miskai.lt/index.php?id=67.
As far as I understand, all forests in Lithuania are divided into forestries "girininkijos" which are in turn divided into smaller units "eiguvos".Juozas Rimas20:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! It is really sad, I personally do not know that to do with this issue, Renata was one of the most valuated contributors. We should hope that she will come back one day. Now we should reinforce our efforts in projects, which she left. M.K.22:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am writing a bit different article, not for general Lithuanian history . But info which I use could be used in general Lit. history and vice versa too M.K.15:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sauerkraut is essential for Polish bigos. I'd expect it to be in Lithuanian bigos as well, as the "cuisine culture" is largely shared between the two nations. But let's leave it to Lithuanian editors to confirm or correct this. I'd be surprised to see bigos in "the West" (Western Europe or the US). I think its preparation recipe was actually against the EU regulations (because good bigos needs to be old and reheated many times). It's certainly a dish that you can order in any restaurant in Poland, but I've never met it in Lithuania. --Lysytalk18:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello!
First about Lithuanian cuisine article, I suggest also adding kučiukai (or šlyžikai) also it is quite traditional some sort of desert :) , talking about borrowed dishes I missed – šašlykai which should be roasted on birchen woods. Besides the century (17) of potatoes, when were introduced in Lithuania, should be closely examined.
About photo of honey Image:Runny hunny.jpg, sadly I do not have Lithuanian beehives, but you can request this photo in proper section of wikiprject Lithuania. About word biciuliai, yes this word is still used to describe the good friends. I remember that Valdas Adamkus received a beehives with bees from Viktor Yushchenko.
About word numire – this word is most common when dealing with death, it also used to animals and humans; plus there is another word pastipo which is used to describe death of bigger animals like dogs, but this word is not used lets say for bees (personally I did not heard that anybody would say mano bites pastipo); there are few more words. Maybe numire should be translated as died? M.K.19:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC) p.s. i have no wikistress at all :) but thanks for your concern.[reply]
I have a pleasure to eat šašlykai last weekend:). Kučiukai is small pieces of roasted dough with the poppy seed. All these small roasted pieces are put into the grinded poppy seed mass, which water. Eating during the Kučios. these are KuciukaiM.K.20:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, did I hear a bit of nostalgia in your last sentence on mine talk?
Yeah, it was in family sodas :) but with wine...this time.
As I see you already figured about how to upload images; maybe these tutorials could help you in the future: Help:Contents/Images and media and as you see a bot made a notice that you forgot to add license (I fix it) , you also could familiarize with these: Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. cya M.K.09:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Yes dektine is legal, no doubt about it. About images, it is quite difficult question, but I will try to find out how to deal with it, in particular case as yours. Yup, it would be great if more people could participate here! M.K.16:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I reread and rethought issues regarding paintings and photos. And I think that then you have or own painting and by taking photo of it and uploading taken photo in wikipedia you should placed a tag some sort like PD-self with proper explanation in Source place. But this is only mine ideas, they could be wrong. M.K.21:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Kuciukai.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your help in cleaning up vandalism.
I know how frustrating and irritating it is when people vandalise our hard work, but please, I urge you to set your anger aside and take it easy on the newcomers.
I am referring to the warning that you left on this talk page. In my opinion, the edit was not serious enough to warrant a level 4 warning after only a single prior vandalism warning. I realise that the comment could have been a personal affront to you, but please do not take it personally. There are guidelines to how to deal with vandalism and I encourage you to follow these no matter how angry or affronted you may feel.
Also, unsigned messaged are considered rude. Please sign your message and date stamp it by adding four tildes (~~~~) after any message left on a user's talk page.
Once again, thanks for helping to keep Wikipedia vandalism free.
Sorry if I did not follow the proper protocol for warning messages.
No need to apologise, you were operating in good faith
Does this protocol apply to all cases?
No, there are exceptions. In this instance, the worst warning I would use would be:
{{subst:blatantvandal}} ~~~~
You can use {{subst:test4im}} ~~~~ as a first warning "for extreme cases of vandalism". The tendency would be to class extreme vandalism as multiple edits to multiple articles which are designed to evade detection. The person would subtly change names, dates, add nonsense masquerading as facts, and perhaps delete some text. This type of edit is not easy to identify as vandalism and often goes undetected. When it is discovered we tend to check all the other recent contributions for that user or IP. If multiple instances of this type of vandalism is discovered then we would post a "This is the only warning you will receive!" message since it is obvious that it was a calculated act of vandalism.
Swearing and profanity are not classed as extreme vandalism, nor is it always blatant vandalism. Often, new users will read an article with which they strongly disagree and add comments to the article itself, sometimes expressing themselves in colourful language. In these instances we might not even warn them, instead we point them to the discussion page after reverting their edits. This is the way we "assume good faith". Only if the user persists and shows that they are intent on damaging the articles do we escalate to calling the edits vandalism.
Sometimes it's hard to wait for a bot to come along and fix it.
You don't have to wait for a bot to fix it, you are encouraged to fix vandalism when you find it. The bots are far from perfect and they often miss instances of vandalism that are not immediately obvious.
I am not sleeping yet :) Likely Vilkmergė has a combination of two words: Vilkas (wolf) and Merga (+- girl) and we have Wolf`s girl, but the deeper linguistically research should be done to identified combinations properly. M.K.19:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
I got it to redirect properly now. The redirect statement redirected the article to itself. Not a problem.
I do have pictures of Phantom Ranch. I thought the existing pics in the article looked good, but I can find a couple of my best ones to compliment it. I will be down there again in January (camping), and I hope to get some good wintry-looking pictures before I freeze out there! I have read Death in Grand Canyon, though I waited some time before doing so (easily recognizing the irony of having the book in my car should something happen to me on one of my hikes, and so resisted buying it for more than a year.) However, I found it full of cautionary tales on what not to do while hiking in the Grand Canyon or other desert environments, so my apprehension was unnecessary. Notary13719:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Funny that you mention about the picture type, see my note on the article's talk page. Since I'm going to be there in January, I can get a good photo from the Clear Creek Trail at Phantom Overlook when there is no foliage, so you can see all the buildings. Now I can't wait! Notary13719:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Added something neat to Hermit Trail. There was a template to use, {{geoscale-US-mountain}} which links to TopoZone, Google Maps, TerraServer, etc. Scale for TopoZone is not ideal for trails, so I'm thinking of adding a Template:geolinks-US-trails, changing the sacle to what is used on your link on Phantom Ranch. It looks like a rainy day tomorrow in Las Vegas, so I just might get it done! Notary13700:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are not thinking of leaving, are you? I noticed you removed yourself from the Portal:Lithuania guestbook... Wonder why and if you are ok... Renata23:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe not entirely but thanks for your concern. I can see that I've been spoiled by my boss, husband, friends, and children, to the point where it's a shock to not get cooperation, thanks, hugs, etc. These things are not forthcoming in Wikipedia - it's just not a very warm place. There are other paths to "žmonių gėrybei" that are probably better suited to me. But planning to finish up a few more items. Sincerely, Novickas 16:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Agh, yeah, I know what you are talking about. Yes, WP is a very cold and lonely place. If you work hard and write good articles, no one will thank or even notice you. If you mess up something, you will be screemed at. If you troll and vandalize, you will get all the attention you want. Anyhow, it was good to have you here, thanks for all your help, and I hope "neminėsit blogu žodžiu." A month ago I would have said: "Oh no! Don't go, you are needed here." Today I say: "Run! Before it's not too late." Renata17:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks guys. If you want me to edit something I would be happy to do so. Novickas 15:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
It's ok to chat. I need to do that more often myself :) I printed out the Jungle, maybe I'll read it - first few pages seem hard to follow though. I found about it like a year ago when one of my classmates was studying it for the English class. I was so surprised! Somehow no one talks about it in Lithuania.
On evolution. You should have met me before I came to the U.S. I am completely new person now. On WP, you should have met me before the PL-LT wars started. I was a lot friendlier and nicer back then. Now I feel like a grumpy old lady :) WP is a very hostile place to live in. So many strangers, so many rude people, so many upset people. Add different cultures, education, and opinions, mix in nationalities and bake it in the oven of very limited communication (no face-to-face interaction) and sprinkle with personal issues and you'll get a nice pie called WP community. But for whatever reason (still don't understand myself) that pie is very addictive...
A bright future, you say? Hm, that'd be good. Can I order two to go and do you accept credit cards? :) I don't really know how you came to that conclusion, but hey, thanks. Renata23:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mind if I pop in here, uninvited ? About the WP community and POV conflicts. It's an eye-opener for me, but you really need a good perspective to appreciate this. After the initial shock, you start to realize, that the conflicting points of view can be often equally justified. One can learn a lot more than from books, all the TV/news crap or even the educated chats with your friends. One has only to often remind oneself that the backgrounds and cultures are different and people can act differently. If only there were less aggression ... Cheers. --Lysytalk18:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, would you mind shooting me an email? Simply attach @gmail.com to my username (which is Renata3). I have one real life project going on in Chicago and maybe you could offer some tips how to proceed. Renata22:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
if you remember, we have had some brief communication on Lithuanian geography. I also noticed you have in some cases proof-read wiki articles related to Lithuania. When you have some spare time, could you take a look at the page on Žirmūnai, my native borough in Vilnius? I co-authored it to make it the most extensive article on Vilnius' boroughs. I know it's weird the article on the Old Town is now smaller :)
By the way, regarding the Žirmūnai article, is there a more suitable word in English instead of "ferry" to convey the idea of the ships cruising in the small Neris River. You can see the ship in one of the photos on the page. "Ferry" sounds like a huge bulky barge which transports people and cars over a big body of water, whereas the ships in Neris are old, relatively small Soviet "cruise" river ships that go to and fro in the river with passengers only. I used the term "motor ship" but I bet it sounded weird, perhaps like jet-ski? :)
Thanks for the check of Žirmūnai! I have edited some places where the meaning was distorted a bit. I've also had added a new paragraph on an obscure Soviet-time pontoon-bridge tragedy. Juozas Rimas07:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! After some more expansion, we are approaching satiation with the Žirmūnai :) I've also hashed up a short lead section. Your copy-edit would be very welcome, especially for the lead. Juozas Rimas12:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you did a great job on the Žirmūnai article! However, I had to remove the bit from the Age Cohorts which implied that Russians live shorter in Lithuania than Lithuanians - do we have such information? (WHO statistics are on Russia, as a country). I'm also not sure about the attractiveness of Žirmūnai to retirees. From my everyday observations, the high average age comes due to the people who came to live here in the 1960s being very settled. But today, when appartments in Žirmūnai are expensive, many retirees actually sell their appartments and go to a cheaper place to live. What do you think? Juozas Rimas16:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the crime rates are even lower now (2006 data) - a 24-percent decline. I'll add the info tomorrow, together with the crime types breakdown. Juozas Rimas22:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, when you have time, for the sake of completeness, you could return the interesting figures on the crime rates in the US and Canada to Žirmūnai article. I have just updated the crime statistics, fixing my mistakes. The rate is not 20, but close to 50... I hope I'm not mistaken again. I'm not strong at maths :) Make sure you adjust the US figures down to "per 1,000 residents", because I saw they were given on the "per 100,000 residents" scale. Juozas Rimas17:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Argh, sorry for getting back so late. I am really not sure what you are talking about with those south-noth arrows. I don't think I have seen them. You should take screenshot next time, I would be able to tell much more. As for game - there was a similar game somewhere on WP, long ago, can't find a link. In short, some people just have way too much time on their hands. Luckily some people use it in some productive way (like writing Wikipedia ) Renata04:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Some time pasted from your last note, it is good to see that you still with us. Sadly, but there is no public domain Governmental sites in Lithuania, IFAIK. But it depends on which information you need to access from them; they could hold some info which is not protected by copyright.
Regarding www.vilnius.lt - it works fine with my tools. Firstly I suggest you to press ctr (and) F5. Sometimes it helps. It is also usefully to have new version of browser, did you tried new Internet Explorer 7? (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/downloads/default.mspx). Try these messures. Cya. M.K.23:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Novickas, I noticed the references, links, and rewording you just added to this article and wanted to say thanks. I've been wanting to improve that article myself, but hadn't gotten around to it yet. Again thanks, DVD+ R/W14:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I don't have much time to work on the article, but I think it is a pretty good idea, just needs A LOT of work. Maybe I will find few minutes over the weekend. I am just not sure about the Kukutis... I don't think he is that famous to qualify as a national symbol. BTW, great photo of Rupintojelis! :) Renata15:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Sorry for delay to answering to your question and request I will take deep look at article tomorrow eee...today but only in morning :) I am veeeery busy these days, so mine participation is a bit halted now. Cya soon! M.K.01:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again! I read your article and have few suggestion: firstly it would be worth to note about six angle cross, for instance it is used it Order of Vytis: Image:Cross_of_Vytis.jpg, also six angle cross is the symbol of Lithuanian military. In text it is mentioned that Vytis is used and in coins, maybe it worth to place a picture of these coins. Maybe also references should be harmonized a bit, but this is not very important. M.K.16:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, sorry for late reply and not being able to work on the symbols. I have tons of things to do in real tife.... Vilnius.lt loads perfectly fine. It's slow, but works. I don't have a clue what might be wrong with your computer... Renata16:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, there is no way to count the characters. That message is just a notice that the article might be a bit too long. There is this ancient limit of 32kb that gets ignored all the time, but if the page gets way too long (like 100+kb) then it might be a problem with GA of FA nomination. Renata20:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, please edit Vilnius in here because no one knows how long it's gonna take to bring Vilnius to a more presentable format and no one wants the world to see the dirty kitchen :)
BTW, I was not taking exams. I was just busy with life. But yesterday was my last day of school! 100 gramu is in order :) Renata02:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As an answer to your request of an audio recording on the portal. You can find one here [1] (not sure if the quality is good enough for you). From the same site I got the french traduction I used to update fr:Tautiška giesmė and was planning to add the audio file. But I am a newby with wikipedia and I still didn't investigate how to create the ogg file. I've already asked and got authorisation from the owner of the blog Gilles/Dzilis to use the audio file. If you add the anthem to wikicommon please let me knowJmnil10:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I hope you are having a great time off Wikipedia and that your New Year will be properous and merry. I have finished the history article (finally!) and it needs your copy-edits :) So if you get a chance some time... Thanks! Renata12:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 2 or 3 signatories a day? Wow, you are ambitious :) If seriously, I have the book at home (bought through eBay - you can find interesting stuff there). But carrying all that home, wow, you are ambitious ;) So I don't have any special requests...
As for your technical questions, Kaunas botanical garden needs to be moved/renamed. Go to the article and click on the move tab (between "history" and "watch" tabs atop of an article), type in a new name (this time with the capitals) and click ok. As for Kęstutis Nakas you need to create a redirect. Go to Kestutis Nakas and type in #REDIRECT[[Kęstutis Nakas]]. Note that # is neccesary; if you change what's in between the brackets, it will redirect to a different page. Click save, and you are done. Lesson finished :) Renata02:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've heard that you're going to fill all the Signees of act of independance, so please, do not create article on Jonas Vileišis - I recently began translation on him from lt wikipedia, and haven't finshed yet. And of course your copyedit will be appreciated:) --Lokyz09:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WOW! It you be very nice to see signatories completed! When you have time could you please copy edit a new section Vilnius_Castle_Complex#Complex_today? I finally managed to complete the article and only my poor spelling left now in new paragraph :) Thanks for encourage on DYK tooM.K. 12:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
A! I will wait, no need to rush! M.K.13:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome! I look at the image and as I understand the tag for "educational purposes" is not valid any more, I suggest to ask Renata for more, she is THE admin :) . Thanks for the Act link it will be very handy in article. My too did not find proper translation of Act in EN, yet. Still searching. M.K.16:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, you are big mama, remember? LOL. Btw, could you place original text in Wikisource? Novickas, I nominated article about horses for DYK, i hope you do not mind. M.K.18:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Lithuanian Heavy Draught Horse.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
I would like to express sincere gratitude to your dedication working on articles; and signatories are complete by your effort too. So once again thanks for your input. When you have time and good mood you always welcome to copy edit my articles such as this. Cya, M.K.11:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Even though you did not ask me, "būna" is a present tense. Būti (infinitive) - būna (present) - buvo and būdavo (past) - bus (future). Is just that people usually say "yra" is something is present right here and right now. I think it's similar to English present tense in "festivals happen every now and then." Renata01:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No need to blackmail bribe me, I've told allready I'm not leaving, just reconsidering a few things. And yes, please, those articles need to be created:)--Lokyz17:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And sorry or my rough tone, I do apreciate your help very much, sincere THANK YOU! (Is the bribe suggestion still available?)--Lokyz18:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On February 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agriculture in Lithuania, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.
Labas rytas!!!!Thanks for encouragement! About sentence in question, maybe I translated badly but this is original:
Gynybos tikslais tvirtovė buvo suskirstyta į keturis sektorius: 1-asis sektorius tęsėsi nuo kairiojo Nemuno kranto ties Pypliais iki Jiesios upės. Jam priklausė pirmieji trys fortai, 2-asis sektorius buvo nuo Jiesios upės iki kairiojo Nemuno kranto prieš Pažaislio vienuolyną su IV -tuoju ir V -tuoju fortais. Trečias sektorius užėmė plotą nuo dešiniojo iki kairiojo Nemuno krantų su VI-tuoju ir VII-tuoju fortais. Ketvirtasis sektorius tęsėsi nuo dešiniojo Neries kranto ir kairiojo Nemuno kranto. Jam priklausė VIII-tasis ir IX-tasis. Hope it would help. Cheers, M.K.16:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No need to rush:) But yeah I will move it soon. BTW, maybe you will have suggestions for this one too (it is not finished yet); left some remarks about this on Renata's talk page. M.K.17:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article about Act of 16th is not deserve to be copy edited yet, because it is in miserable state; many formulations and paragraph's probably will be divided merged etc. Waiting for suggestions from Renata, you and others to proceed. M.K.22:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I don't there is anything else that could be done (adding some famous people with that name? origin?). Anything in comparison to current state sounds good :) I just posted on the project in case someone has some ideas and time to salvage it. Renata18:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I still waiting from all contributors some sort of feedback of article structure etc, of course if you are not busy you can proceed with copy edits; but the edition is not final so it could result another copy edit in near future. M.K.17:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Renata delivered nice adjustments to article, so probably copy edit would be nice addition too. If you have time please do this. M.K.14:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no! No need to be sorry! I only tried to make it a bit more compact and yes please make a copy edit of the new part edition. M.K.18:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, I noticed that you placed an full e-mail, such action could arrack additional spam, I suggest you to writhe it in different format, like: novickas_iota [At] yahoo.com or similar.M.K.10:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I expanded the article a bit, your copy edit skills are needed. M.K.
Hello, first of, great work all around! You were done with signatories way ahead of the schedule! :) Second, since you are doing such a superb job, could you please (sugar-coated-sprinkled-with-cherries please) create Vilnius Conference article? I wanted to do that this weekend but the act draft took too long and I got some flu or something... Thank you! Renata05:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My flu got much better, but my work much worse :( I hope you are doing better. Sorry to sneak into conversations, but I do have a source on Vilnius Conference and flag issues and I was just waiting for some free time to post it up. Renata17:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks. There is no much of snow storm where I live, so it's not that bad. If you are going to the library, could look for something about Vilnius Castles for MK? I really doubt you'll find something very useful, but you have a tallent to dig out stuff ;) The article really lacks info on the Crooked castle... Renata12:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Griffith Buck, was selected for DYK!
On February 8, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Griffith Buck, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.
... for tireless and heroic fight against the red links and me do not speaking englich...
... comes this potato-heart award which can be used (1) to cook kugelis; (2) as a late Valentine's gift in LT-style; (3) to distil the mighty 100 gramu; (4) to plant during the bulviasodis and make more potatos; (5) just another useless piece of garbage lying around with some sort of sentimental value.
Wow, thanks, peeps. That really made my day. Usage #5 is what I'm thinking, it's printing out and it will probably sit on top of the piano for years to come. It's been great working with all of you. Novickas 11:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
I actually didn't mean to remove that entry and I'm really sorry about that. I've re-added it to the list of suggestions and it should be used the next time DYK is refreshed.--Carabinieri15:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the article Lithuanian nationality law. Unfortunately the law isn't really clear on the matter of possibility or restriction to get dual nationality. I heard also that the law is again been discussed in the seima thus the application of the existing one is put on hold. Perhaps you can confirm that. I should say that I have a direct interest here as we want to get the Lithuanian citizenship for our daughter who get already the French one at birth. Why did you remove the Latin expression Jus sanguinis? Is there restriction on the use of such common Latin sentence in WK? For me at least Jus sanguinis is much more explicit (cf french expression droit du sang) Jmnil11:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Big mamma is here again :) In short, original texts do not belong on WP articles, they belong on Wikisource (if they are in the public domain). WP articles should be about that text but not the text itself. So the law has to go... Renata12:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On March 7, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article StormReady, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.
I'm truly sorry to find that intellectual honesty and honor are not concepts that Wikipedia recognizes.[2] However, since these concepts are alive and well in universities, research institutions, the US military, and elsewhere, I have faith that they will eventually be recognized here as well. Novickas 14:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The sooner you understand how the reasoning of those who were the objects of your RFA operates, the less dissapointed you will be. If J.L. had moved to Kaunas in the 1920's, had composed the Lithuanian National Anthem, and had written his Last Will and Testament in prefect Lithuanian, you still would have been told he was born in Poland and was Polish. Now he can rest in peace in the English Wikipedia as being born in "Poland" (at the time Russia) and is both a Pole and a "Russian" to boot. But as always, during these discussions you can count on a few pearls being relayed during their arguments. Here are two of my favorites: the first from the response at your RFA, where the commentator "not wanting to create too much bad blood between Polish and Lithuanian editors" says speaking of the Lithuanian wikicommunity ....that it seems to be a tad touchy when it comes to Polish-Lithuanian relations and people born in Vilna in the times when the town was not yet a part of Lithuania... Not yet a part of Lithuania? Saving the best for last, you might remember this one from the J.L. talk page...I'm beginning to think that the small Lithuanian club on Wikipedia has some serious problem with understanding that not everyone who was ever born in Poland is Lithuanian by default. I hope I got you to smile, it got me to laugh. Oh, and BTW thanks for giving us all an insight on how they count google hits too. Dr. Dan16:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, like Bertie Wooster, I "emitted a hollow l.", if that counts. Novickas 17:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Almost forgot, Happy International Woman's Day to you, and any of my friends on Wikipedia who catch this tidbit. And although one of your "opponents" in the RFA pretended to not be aware of your gender (after months of your participation on WP, and a nice "User Page" pretty much "giving it up" ), I'll assume good faith and chalk it up to his same inability to distinguish that Vilnius is not in Poland. I'd wish them both a "Happy Woman's Day" too, but they'd probably whine that I'm being uncivil to them and their parents again. Dr. Dan22:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, doc. Now that I look at my talk page it does kind of say Kinder, Küche, Kirche. Oh well. Novickas 00:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
As to your gender - sorry, I did not know it. Men have kids too, you know. Your Babel boxes do not help either - being a man I also enjoy cooking, espresso, flowers and weather..//Halibutt08:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I notice that you are signing your messages by typing your name in the end. You can instead just type four tildes like this: ~~~~ and wiki-software would convert that into the name+date stamp just like this:
Would you please leave it alone? She is using the beloved four tildes just has special signature preferences. Thank you! Renata11:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to include the very image some time ago :) well done, although it needs a contrast boost to look better or the change of the black point.Iulius14:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I see you making tremendous progress in DYK area, keep it up. Regarding Zirmunai article - prime concern is lead as noted contributor. When this issue is solved I will ask particular contributor to take a look to the article for second time and state if all the problems which he listed are solved.M.K.09:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, I didn't add most, if any, links to Polonica.net; in Treaty of Warsaw (1920) it found itself as I simply copied the refs from other articles, assuming with good faith that they use reliable, verifed sources. The main page of polonica.net, which I just checked for the first time, is indeed disturbing, and I certainly agree it would be preferable not to use any materials published by it - however the question is, was the article about Piłsudski published (solely) by it, or did this website simply chose to reprint an article found elsewhere on the web? In that second case we should it would not make the article unreliable (if an extremist website copies and reproduces reliable content, it doesn't make the content less reliable). Based on the information here (the site, related to Polish Ministry of Education, seems rather reliable), this article was first published on another website (now 404); its Polish translation (or original) is also reproduced for example here (I don't see anything controversial about that site). Nonetheless I have replaced most of the refs to this article with more reliable refs, to be on the safe side; if you think any fact in Wikipedia referenced to that website is dubious or not-neutral, feel free to tag it as such in the article and raise the issue on talk. Bottom line is that certainly, polonica.net portal, by itself, seems as unreliable as Vilnija stuff, and we should be very careful about using anything associated with such sources.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, nice to see you. Thanks for the links, yes they are about the same watchdog. Regarding copyedit, currently I have in mind this one. It is only the draft, needs expansion, proper headline names, spelling etc. maybe you will have some suggestions. M.K.17:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. Both, for the copy-edit (as I said, magic...) and the cartoon (I really like this one). After re-reading the article I found some of my own mistakes :( ... BTW, individual years should not be wiki-linked. Also, the comma in dates like January 12007 is not necessary as the software will do it for you. Off to bed. Renata05:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please, if you want you can nominate it, no problem. Just then article is properly written ask Renata to move it from sandbox to proper place, as it needs admin skills. Another point, we have to think about the proper name of the article too. Cheers, M.K.20:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have nominated the house to GA (it still lacked a para on Kęstutis), but now I think it's good enough for FA. As for your question, the text is copyrighted (unless you can find anything that explicitly says otherwise) and cannot be included either here on Wikipedia or there on Wikisource. But you can definitely quote from there. Renata15:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I read the article and I completely agree with the notes left on Talk:Cheddar Gorge and Caves. I know this article can be so much better. The prose is choppy (look who's talking :), reads like a tourist broshure, most information is trivial and the real substence is just touched upon (like the cave description is just 6 sentences). So I would fail the article and send it for a complete re-write (yeah, I am that cruel :), because I don't think it's salvageable by couple edits. Renata21:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above case is closed. A general amnesty for editors involved in Eastern Europe-related articles is extended, with the expectation that further editing will adhere to Wikipedia's policies. Future behavior problems may be addressed by the Arbitration Committee on the motion of any Arbitrator or upon acceptance of a request for inquiry by any user who edits in this area. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon(t)19:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot17:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems there is an actual policy that a signature must contain a link so they won't fix the bot. If you ask me, none of their business. But you can get rid of the bot by opting out. There is a category that you need to add to your userpage. Renata17:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Looks better now! Still reads rather odd for an article about a European native species to be in American English; might be best (per the Wiki MOS) to avoid words with spelling differences (favor/favour, paralyze/paralyse, etc.). It also needs a couple of formatting changes; scientific names should be in italics with the genus name capitalised and the species name in lower case, e.g.: Grapholita molesta (which also has a typo!) - MPF18:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On 20 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pyemotes herfsi, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Thank you for the kind words. Yes, feminism sounds good for DYK hook. Somehow Lithuanians were really into democracy: every document that said we want independence also said the state should be democratic. I wonder how did that happen... In the meantime, I am planning on the press ban article. Just which title do you prefer: Lithuanian press ban or Ban of Lithuanian press? Or maybe something else? Renata17:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The short name of the prize is - Lithuanian national prize, although full version might be mentioned in the lead. As for the Recipients of the Lithuanian National Prize I can move it there just now, but we must agree whether it is the title we should use, to make it last one move. I started it as a stub for a single purpose, i thought it is needed, and is something to be proud of. I'm waiting your comments.--Lokyz16:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The prize is awarded rather than won, but it's may be just my native Lithuanian language connotations. And I do not think, there is another National Prize in Lithuania (to be used as this short name)- NACIONALINĖS PAŽANGOS PREMIJA is another thing - and is translated as National Adwancement Prize.--Lokyz16:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about categories - it's my job, that I'm good at - trust me, when I began there were few of them:) Unless you want to help me expanding Lithuanian articles categories.--Lokyz17:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
siejama su šeimą ištikusiomis nelaimėmis ir ekonominiais sunkumais - "is related with economical hardship and troubles befalen on family." Aproximately so.--Lokyz15:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I found your comments about Mitteleuropa in Vilnius Conference page-you might be interested that German Empire planned to expell tens of thousands of Lithuanians from annexed territories to make room for German colonists as part of this project-I have the necessary reference from German scholar, can you think of an article about Lithuania where this information could be added ? --Molobo01:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Panemunė statistics or "statistika" navigational button on the left. I've already put the data. as for Rykantai I did it because i think, I've found a nice girl to provide quality images and wanted to demonstrate for her how Wikipedia works.--Lokyz20:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your copy edit to me looked like expansion of article :) Regarding GA, it is not obligatory ti review another one article, but if you do it would be nice, as there are a lot of candidates and few reviewers. Combating various ad-wares and similar threats there are a great products at lavasoft, (some versions are for free). M.K.08:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus OmniaTalk20:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since we cite better quality sources, I think we can remove the Britannica entry ([4]). If you want to keep it, could you add the author to it? The "better" Britannica quotes are attributed to reliable authors; the anonomious ones we can really do well without. On another note, I think we could safely remove all quotations that are in the article - or rather, move them to Wikiquote. Perhaps we could add a few quotations to the article - like in William Shakespeare article - but those should be reasonably neutral. I certainly don't think we should encourage addition of controversial quotations just so one side or the other can 'sneak' a statement that would never made it through NPOV/UNDUE/WEASEL.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 19:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since I've seen you involved in disputes regarding banned(?) republika.pl hosting service, can you comment on this please [5]? Regards,--Lokyz17:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
During this weekend I spent some time reading classics. For upcoming days i planing to review and select some modern works, but having problems with selection. In one hand I was intrigued by BBC news report regarding Doris Lessing and her quite rough answers, but I am not sure if it worth to start reading her works. Maybe you read some of her works? In short, could you recommend any truly worthy modern works to read? Thanks, M.K.09:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments, I will definitely look in your suggestions. Regarding Lessing, probably every reader have to draw conclusion about her feminism if any. Perhaps it is another argument to investigate her works more closely. You have mentioned Animal Farm and I just remembered interview with Venclova. What an irony of life - son of Soviet establishment and most fierce critic of this system. And his words are gold value: Esu lietuvis, niekuo kitu negaliu ir nenorėčiau būti. M.K.10:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand you correctly you have face to face contact with Venclova? If this is so, it would be great to have access to his family photo archive (a very great one!) and perhaps use some photos (Joseph Brodsky, Milosz with him) here in WP. M.K.21:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC) P.S. oh, and one more thing, could you give ce to this one?[reply]
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Lithuanian press ban, was selected for DYK!
I've just edited the page on Lithuanian press ban, Aftermath section. You added that "the Great Seimas of Vilnius, which took place in November 2005, was now able to issue its announcements and publications in Lithuanian." I changed the date to 1905, but maybe I've missed something - could you have a look at whether it's now correct?
Hello, I just rereading this article's talk page, as you contributed to this article, maybe you also have some ideas about listed issues. Take care, M.K. (talk) 13:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello; answering to your points - 1) maybe some ideas would be helpful looking into Vytautas, Jogaila articles. 2) currently there are no such specific maps, and maps will take time to make. Maybe in the upcoming future, will do. 3) At this point no need to worry about article's length; it is good idea to incorporate some issues from House of M. Maybe some ideas can be found here too. Take care, M.K. (talk) 12:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lithuanian basketball 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lithuanian basketball 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Lithuanian folk cross 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Lithuanian Black-Headed sheep, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, hope all is good and the break from Wikipedia was a pleasant one. Could you please (with cherry sprinkles on top) work your way through 1926 Lithuanian coup d'état - it is currently a Good Article candidate, but I think it could have featured potential. Thank you! Renata (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! I added extra para from the book you linked about international reaction. Do you think the article is FA-worthy? Renata (talk) 01:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A Beautiful Cherry Tree in Spring BloomTheres nothing like seeing a field full of spring flowers.
Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I used databases that I have access to thru my college's library. And it's actually a pretty cool source - while I always have to be careful about their accuracy (as they describe events that just happened or are about to happen), the articles are rather balanced and focussed more on factual information. They also discuss international situation a lot, gives good sense who the events were viewed at the time, and provides some interesting details. I am also impressed by accuracy - even long Lithuanian names are spelled correctly and interpretations of events pretty much the same as in books written fifty years later with the benefit of the hindsight. The only drawback is that it takes forever to research it... Last night's edit took me almost 6 hours!
Would you care to do your magic trick of copyediting? I finished writing it at 3am so I imagine my English in places must be extra bad. Thank you! Renata (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence § t/e17:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a problem with references and they aren't being used, no-one should have a problem with you removing them. In an ideal world. The references in question are below an ideal standard of acceptability, but we're talking ideal here, aren't we?! Regarding the link I moved ... it was blacklisted and edits to the article became impossible as a result. So that's why I removed it. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for improving the Oil shale article. Your assistance was crucial for achieving the FA status. As next FAC article, I am going to nominate Oil shale extraction. However, before that I hope to have some critical reviews to be sure that all criteria are fulfilled. I hope you are still interested about this topic.Beagel (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, so I put your userboxes in a simple two-column table. You can play with it more, move the boxes around, etc. But I hope this solves major issues. As for pavasaris, I have my spring break next week... silly timing if you ask me, but the weather could not be nicer :) Renata (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I wanted to ask you... How would you suggest naming artificial lakes like Kauno marios or Elektrėnai marios? As of right now they are translated as "lagoon" which I don't believe to be correct. Any advice would be cool... :) Renata (talk) 06:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, great, I moved the article already. WP was ridiculed for at least two years for using "lagoon"... Anyway, since you proved to be such an expert on lakes, can you help me with something else? I wrote Lakes of Lithuania a looooong time ago. At the time I could not figure out how to translate scientific terms related to lake origins: ledo guolio ežerai and dubakloniai, latakiniai, or rininiai. Would you have a clue? Renata (talk) 21:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not a big deal. Don't over-research if not readily available. It sat there for two years without translation, it can sit for another two :) PS. you should probably archive ↑ discussions. Renata (talk) 22:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and "baight" is a typo for "bight". It was supposed to be "įlanka" or "atšaka" - I used this computerized dictionary Alkonas, which totally sux. It should be something like "bay" or "branch" probably. Renata (talk) 18:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it just took me, like, um, I dunno,... forever! to find the info. And it still lacks a bunch of important stuff that I don't have/can't find sources for. It also needs photos, you would not be passing by Rumšiškės, would ya? :) Renata (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah the Lithuanian poetic name "paukščiukai", like the birds sitting on the trees (or letters). Just a note - in Latin, internationally recognized as scholar language they're called Diacritics. And please accept my personal thanks for fixing birds. Cheers;)--Lokyz (talk) 12:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But it's so much nicer than diacritic, such a harsh word. Don't worry, I won't use "birds" in an article, I figured it wouldn't matter in an edit summary. On the other hand, in our family we always refer to the dot over the ė as a musė, much less poetic. Best, Novickas (talk) 13:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh. The Lithuanian language is soooo complicated...
Tu - is used to address someone who is a close friend, relative, and rather familiar expression. In most cases it does not use name and can be regarded as fignerpointing. In this cas eperson is addressed given name and first person daryti-darai-darote.
Jūs - has some flavour of the status: it is not uncommon to address mother and father (rather old tradition - for example my sister did address our parents Jūs (and sometimes, when speaking to mom she did not use Jūs, and addressed her mama, using first person addressing), I did Tu(it was reversed when it came to autoritah things), but more common it is to use as a respectfull form addressing people older than yoorself, people with social status. And it is addressing to a third person (two heads for siplification: daryti-darai-darote) This distinction can be easily transformed into informal language by the one who's been addressed. Popular forms are - please, don't grow my second head, get easy, my name is * and others. Jūs is mostly followed by surname.
Hence i should address You as Jūs, Novickas.
There is some form "Pats" roughly translated as "You, the one who has ownership, and therefore is independent and sovereighn" - it's formal addressing into someone you do respect, and he told you to get easy, and you can use name, just TU would get too familiar, and breake certain barrier of friendly/famliarity.
There is aslo older form of pats used only in shcools 'Tamsta, derivative from Tavo mylista.
I think for now I'll not go into political usage of the mix of various forms of these addressing formats.
It is not such a complicated as Japanese personal addressing forms, but one from outside not so easily comprehensible. hope this helps, sorry for my broken English.--Lokyz (talk) 14:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes there is a verb "tujinti" - it means a disrespectfull bahaviour, i.e. familiarity. To come and address one you do not know as a oldtime fellow. And there are some situations where one is left without epaulet. It's and idiom, not sure whether local Lithianian or Polish, Russian or German... if one is naked (like in the Sauna) they are all as the mother (Eve) let them be, hence equal. While the epaulets are on again situation changes. One might think about it as some sort of Dionisian festival.
Jūs'inimas is slowly going away, but it the non-usage of Jūs still does annoy people, roughly from 30 years on. And people with status. On the other hand I do not feel well if people even 3 or 4 years older than I'm address me Jūs and/or third person. The same goes for my Goddaughter and her brother (my sister's children)- once upon a time their father forced them to call me Jūs, and I do get schizophrenic when she calls me Tu, and he Jūs. Gosh.--Lokyz (talk) 14:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This brings back some memories:) laba diena tamsta, laba diena mokiniai (beginining of a music lesson). Despite how much I hate googling for knowledge search - [6] - it is used until nowadays. And the article you found is really good. Cheers.--Lokyz (talk) 00:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is very good. I made only some formatting. Propose to nominate also for the main page DYK. I will add also to the next pool of the Energy Portal DYK.Beagel (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, article is good - thank you! The past tense confused me. I assumed that the plant was closed and because the article did not say why it was closed, I tried to look it up. What I came up was not entirely clear, but the plant almost went bankrupt last year, but the government bailed it out. It seems it is still under construction/repairs and will reopen later this year. So I think it should be "is" and not "was". Renata (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I't is awarded in Presidential Palace, Vilnius by president himself. There was an exceptoon this year, as the ceremony was held not on Feburary 16th, but earlier (Feburary 12th I think [9], Febrary 15th in 2007 [10]).
P.S. When you will finish c/e (no need to hurry!) in sandbox, please let me know, I would like to make some edits, as I do not want to interfere now during c/e process now. Cheers, M.K. (talk) 09:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if you ever went on your picture taking expedition, but I have just discovered the Chicago Historic Resources Survey. You could use this to identify significant buildings in any part of Chicago. It includes all landmarks and many potential landmarks. It should be on reference at most Chicago Public Library locations.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Liūtas Mockūnas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
A small question - maybe it is time to move article from box to this permanent place? M.K. (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)p.s. in other hand just found another publication, which needs to be investigated so lets keep it there for some time.[reply]
It is a bit too early to request this, but I know that my English is not the top level, so could you help fixing Lithuanian Wars of Independence after I'll finish my edits. I think I'll be done editing the article by tomorrow (there are still some issues, and I'm too tired today).--Lokyz (talk) 20:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 4.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was just surfing the net and i stumbled across your name on wikipedia. My Mother is Pure Lithuanian and has a similar name to yours, and seeing your from the USA which mum says she knows that she has cousins who live there and i just thought maybe you would know someone that could help me find out if i do have relatives in usa. Anyways My grandfathers from Klaipėda with the surname navickas. My grandmothers surname is Skiotyte and she is from Marijampolė. I know that they both left during the war (1945) and went to glenelg in South Australia. They were both farming families and I dont know much more than that any further back, but if you know any online Genealogy websites that can help me find out anymore information on my family history or know anyone that can help me please feel free to send me an email.
WikiThanks Please excuse my manners. I did not say a proper thank you for the civil war copy-edit. Truly great work! :) Renata (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it was fun. I'll be offline for the next week or so (reikia priziuret savo sena teva - be interneto, vistiek tikrai visuokiu nauju dalyku isgirsiu). Later - Novickas (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, today I thought you already taking another wiki break. Hope you do well with your upcoming work. Linkėjimai tėvukui, M.K. (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re the comments by other arbs section, there's also
this. There's no doubt more, which I can look for at another time. I'd add it myself, but I dont want to edit your section. BoodlesthecatMeow?17:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I took the afternoon off to hand out Halloween candy. Don't usually have this much time. However, I will consider participating in that article. Novickas (talk) 21:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Renata 14:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
) Renata 04:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
From your fellow wiki-friends and neighbors...
... comes this potato-heart award which can be used (1) to cook kugelis; (2) as a late Valentine's gift in LT-style; (3) to distil the mighty 100 gramu; (4) to plant during the bulviasodis and make more potatos; (5) just another useless piece of garbage lying around with some sort of sentimental value.
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
, see Talk:Walter Payton for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Woodym555 18:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Józef Łukaszewicz page 5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}