User talk:Novelbuzz

Welcome!

Hello, Novelbuzz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dreams Beyond Grades, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gronk Oz (talk) 09:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dreams Beyond Grades

The article Dreams Beyond Grades has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is nothing here to indicate that this book is notable. A search of Google News found only one passing mention of the book, in a very short article about the author. I cannot find any hint that it meets the standard at WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gronk Oz (talk) 09:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dreams Beyond Grades

The article Dreams Beyond Grades has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A plot summary of an autobiography is in itself an autobiography, and in this case a very promotional one. Fails WP:NBOOK. (There's more promotion of this book in Sujit Meher, which had an unsourced claim it was a "bestseller", which I just removed. ) Wikipedia is not for advertising your fashion design nor your book, Sujit.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 15:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dreams Beyond Grades for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dreams Beyond Grades is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreams Beyond Grades until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bishonen | talk 16:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sujit Meher. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 16:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your post on my page, personal attacks warning

Novelbuzz, I don't doubt it's true Sujit Meher is an alumnus of NIFT. (Sorry to hear you say there are only a few respectable alumni, but then I don't know the institute.) Not everything that's true should be in the lead, and putting the institute into the lead gives it undue weight. I know what it is that's "really sad" here. Most of the SPAs or socks promoting Sujit Meher and his so-called "bestseller" have been blocked. You can be too if you keep trying to canvass users to come and agree with you, and keep baselessly accusing people (me and Voceditenore at the moment, I presume?) of trying to "defame" Meher.[1][2][][3][4] Read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Since this is a warning to you, I've copied it to your own page to make sure you see it. Bishonen | talk 11:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop canvassing re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujit Meher

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 07:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest attempts were quite inexcusable [5], [6], [7], [8]. You had already been warned about canvassing, and please note that discussing whether or not an article meets the criteria for inclusion does not constitute "defamation" of the subject as you have been repeatedly attempting to assert. Voceditenore (talk) 07:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. If you do this once more then I will seek to have you blocked from editing. People can find the discussion without your blatant attempts to manipulate it. - Sitush (talk) 10:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On another note, Novelbuzz, please read WP:TALK and WP:SIGN and learn how to format and sign discussion page comments properly. I just spent some time cleaning up the mess you made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujit Meher. Do not move signatures around and sign each new comment. You have spent a lot of time on Wikipedia solely devoted to promoting Sujit Meher and his book, now take the time to learn how participate properly in discussions. If you don't, then the conclusion is obvious: you are not really here to build an encyclopedia at all. Voceditenore (talk) 10:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. You have been repeatedly warned about canvassing and about your nonsensical "defamation" accusations. And in your latest bout of canvassing, you're even asking people to remove the deletion notice from the article Sujit Meher— a notice that clearly states "this notice must not be removed". I don't know if you're Sujit Meher or his press agent, but it's amply clear that your sole purpose on wikipedia is promoting him, and not by fair means either. That amounts to not being here to create an encyclopedia. Don't bother to create any more socks, they will be blocked on sight.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 11:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]