User talk:NovaNova
Croatia - Serbia
[edit]If you want to fight revert war no problem but you must know pages of war. You think that Croatia kingdom has more or less never existed. I think that Stefan Uroš IV Dušan of Serbia has not been emperor because he has declared himself emperor. For him it has been possible to declare himself God and Serbia population of that time will say: Yes master. Croatia has more argument (which you have not defeated on discussion page) to be kingdom of 1 Serbian king which has declared himself emperor. Rjecina 08:21, 21 May 2007 (CET)
Incorrect vandalism warning
[edit]Sorry about that, I was just reverting a little bit too quickly. Andrew_pmk | Talk 02:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Starcevic
[edit]You should take care about this article - due to the fact that you considerably contributed there. Hope you'll read this message soon.
--Giorgio Orsini 19:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Croatization
[edit]Hi,
Would you, please, be interested in expanding, clarifying, and improving http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatisation ???
Regards,
--Giorgio Orsini 17:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Neo-Nazism
[edit]Hey, thanks for your constructive input here (e.g. your last replacement of the broken reference link). Having just been bitten by GiorgioO, your non-destructive edit brightened my day. :-) I still sincerely believe we can come to an agreement on this text; I only ask for correct English and verification... sigh. Here's to consensus! SociableLiberal 15:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Unjustified block
[edit]NovaNova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The Checkuser is quite clear - I am definitely not Puger nor GiorgioOrsini -
as per [1]
Inconclusive. None of them are IP-related. Giorgio and Nova are geographically very
close to each other. Giove is not even hemispherically related. --jpgordon???? 15:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
and as per [2]
Inconclusive. Essjay (Talk) 03:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC).
So, I'd ask someone to remove this pointless block from my account. Thank you. --NovaNova 04:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No, the CheckUser stated that the evidence was inconclusive, not that the accounts are unrelated. Shadow1 (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|Here is just another sound proof of my innocence - July 28 200 as per Checkuser
[3] Modelsides = GiorgioOrsini. NovaNova unrelated. [[User talk:Voice of All|Voice-of-All] 02:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC) --NovaNova 03:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC}}