User talk:Nous sommes des amis avec IPH95
Nous sommes des amis avec IPH95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@Fluffernutter, Gogo Dodo: I WILL CONTINUE TO CREATE SOCKS!!! Hahaha! And I WILL continue to harass people. Nous sommes des amis avec IPH95 (talk) 23:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Nope. Olaf Davis (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Agahghahhajwyhaheheyhahejeyeuk
[edit]@Gogo Dodo and Fluffernutter: affbaangwhheafnagdYsuarueisettskteikregnadh . Nous sommes des amis avec IPH95 (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.