User talk:Nourja

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nourja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

just for enabling an answer here Nourja (talk) 21:07, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please use this template only for unblock requests.--jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:08, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nourja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is indeed an unblock request, but I wanted just to address it to an administrator specialized in referencing. Thank you for help --Nourja (talk) 21:16, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not address the reason behind your block. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:30, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nourja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear jpgordon, dear Kinu, the block refers, as a background, to an old problem of my colleagues on a page judged Non-encyclopedic and not sourced. Now the problem is almost solved (for evidence, please see the sources : [1] and the concerned page at [2]) :You see why I request kindly that the administrator who should deal this block should be an expert in [Sourcing]. :::Hence: If the administrator establishes that one single source among the 29 given there is NOT Veriable & NOT Reliable or NOT Independent/Neutral, then the block is justified. ::Otherwise things are clear and no problem with unblock. ::Dear jpgordon this is why I asked for an administrator is an expert in [Sourcing], if you can verify, then it will be justice and fair. ::Dear Kinu,you also, can help on this. Regards

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Nothing in this unblock request addresses that issue. JamesBWatson (talk) 01:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.