User talk:NouVa

NouVa, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NouVa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Your recent edit to the page Jakarta appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gareth Bale, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Belt and Road Initiative. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: What. my personal opinion? are you serious? It's not mine but from sources, it is opinion of the President of Tanzania. NouVa (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then put quotes around it. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's paraphrased, then. ;NouVa (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 10:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homeless women in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2015 Southeast Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marina Bay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Traslations

It is quite common to have a foreign-language title followed by the title in English, without saying "English", and never a need to link to English language. There are more urgent tasks you could spen your time with. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

just trying to help 'voluntarily'. #NouVa (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PRRI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pacific Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continental.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting article expansion help

Greetings

You seem to have lately engaged in aspects related to article Indonesia.

Requesting you to visit articles Islamic advice literature and Draft:Aurats (word) and please do expand them if find yourself interested.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 03:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm SiberianCat. I notice that you often make edits that add grammatical errors, incorrect information and your own political points of view. Such edits do not improve articles.

For example, in the Joko Widodo article, you misleadingly claimed "Despite of protests from people of Surakarta on leaving the city, Jokowi still ran for 2012 gubernatorial election". Not only does this distort the content of The Jakarta Post article you cited as a reference, it also contains grammatical and syntax errors.

Also in the Joko Widodo article, you added an insult made by a rival politician and a smear made by another politician - hardly encyclopedic content; but rather, more indicative of putting personal political bias into articles. If you wish to use Wikipedia as a means of criticizing politicians you dislike, perhaps you could add proven facts and cite reputable sources, rather than resorting to cherry-picking, twisting statements taken out of context and embellishing.

As another example, your proclivity for inserting personal bias was evident in your edit to the Indonesian identity card article, where you claimed Setya Novanto said Basuki Tjahaja Purnama received bribes - and you added two sources, neither of which backed up your assertion.

In the article Islam in Indonesia, you repeatedly inserted your opinion that "Since 2014, a growing secular nationalist ideology in politics has triggered frictions to the different views and religious ideologies." When challenged to add sources, you added sources that in no way backed up your claim.

When you edited the Test Cricket article, you erroneously stated the Adelaide Oval is in New Zealand. Making articles factually incorrect does not improve the quality of Wikipedia.

Sometimes, your writing is difficult to understand. For example, in the Economy of Indonesia article, you added the following sentence: "Corruption is pervasive in the Indonesian government, affecting many fields that are central to barrier the country’s economic development from local governments, the police, the private sectors even various ministerial institutions which are close to the president." I had to read that sentence several times to try to understand what you mean. I assume you mean: "Pervasive corruption has hindered Indonesia's economic development. Corruption occurs in local governments, the police, the private sector and central government." Your use of phrases such as "even various ministerial institutions which are close to the president" is redundant. All ministerial institutions are by nature close to the president.

Please stop making changes that add grammatical errors, factual errors and your personal political bias to articles. Thank you. SiberianCat (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at B. J. Habibie, you may be blocked from editing. Flix11 (talk) 10:04, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Squash at the 2015 Pan American Games, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]