User talk:Notnilla

License tagging for Image:Longhairfacevelvet.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Longhairfacevelvet.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SouthEastround2v3small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SouthEastround2v3small.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of JACK STICE MEMORIAL COMMINUTY SERVICE AWARD™

A tag has been placed on JACK STICE MEMORIAL COMMINUTY SERVICE AWARD™, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Southeast Leatherfest

An editor has nominated Southeast Leatherfest, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southeast Leatherfest (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catherine Gross

The article Catherine Gross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability has not been established for over 2 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meitar (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Catherine Gross for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catherine Gross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Gross until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Notnilla. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it is difficult to find the usual sources given the secretive nature of our kink society. We have spent decades hiding so we would not be jailed, lose our jobs or placed in psychiatric care. Sado-masochistic societies have thrived on confidentiality and pseudonyms. Tracking down articles written in publications that were circulated only to vetted members known to the publisher is beyond difficult. Even proving what significance those publications (i.e. who wrote them, where they were published, if that group had any significance had) would be difficult at best. We have been working to verify buried history. The award given by Black Rose is significant. At the time, Black Rose was a premier powerhouse with 3500 attendees. It was the only one of it's kind on the eastern seaboard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Rose_(BDSM_organization)#Awards

Pantheon of Leather is given by The Leather Journal - these national awards are the 2nd oldest awards given in the leather community. They have standing and significance. Give me some time with this article and what I believe you'll have at the end of the day is: 1) links to a historical book with proper research from Peter Tupper; 2) archives properly processed at the Leather Archives and Museum in Chicago [this will take some time as my archives span 30 years]; and 3) possible pieces written in the New York Daily, New York University interview, citations from The Leather Journal and Leatherati (the last two being the prominent new vehicles of the SM world). Please consider not deleting a history that you may not understand because SM communities haven't functioned as you would expect the rest of the world to function. We couldn't. Our lives, jobs and families were at stake. References listed on wiki have had their links were removed. Viola Johnson, SouthEast LeatherFest, Kink Aware Professionals pages. Those entities know me personally and received permission to link. That is due to how the communities function in regards to confidentiality.

I understand wiki has an expectation that someone else will write about me. In the BDSM, sado-masochistic, Master/slave, Dominant/submissive communities this would be a breech of accepted behavior. Anyone else writing about me when I haven't given my explicit permission (putting an article here provides that permission) would be viewed as someone else "outing" me. Outing someone in our communities can get members of the community shunned. It's not merely seen as bad practice or poor manners-- it's a severe community infraction. Notnilla (talk) 21:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)notnilla[reply]

Do not write about yourself

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]