User talk:Notevenonce
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Meth Project, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.methproject.com/About_Us/index.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 21:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
- Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC channel to get real-time help. (Click here for instant access.)--Werdan7T @ 00:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
My page was deleted - how can i get it back? It was created using a Fact Sheet but the CorenSearchBot flagged it as being copied from a website.
{{helpme}}
- If it is an appropriate page, you can recreate it but be sure to use your own words. CorenSearchBot found great similarities between the page you created and another page (that was specified). - Rjd0060 17:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thomas Siebel
[edit]I have reverted your recent changes to Thomas Siebel several times, on the grounds that the version(s) you prefer veer further from what WP:BLP and WP:MOSBIO have set out for us than the present version does. Please visit Talk:Thomas Siebel if you would like to attempt to build consensus for a different version. Whatever404 (talk) 11:09, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure why you keep making edits to this article. Your edits are miscategorizing informarmation within the article and your edits have many broken links. My edits are solely to clean up the article, include additional information (which you are also deleting for no apparent reason), and file informaiton under the correct headings. You are making the article worse by not organizing information correctly and by including broken links. Can we come to an agreement? Notevenonce (talk) 17 September 2009
- The article talk page is the place to raise such concerns. Please seek consensus for the drastic changes you wish to make by raising a discussion at the article Talk page: Talk:Thomas Siebel. Whatever404 (talk) 18:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please stop edit-warring. Please come to Talk:Thomas Siebel to discuss the edits you would like to make to the article. Whatever404 (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- All edits are now being discussed in the article talk page. Notevenonce (talk) 18:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk page etiquette
[edit]Please review WP:TALK; interspersing your comments within another person's existing comments (as you did here) is usually only done in extremely long comments, where following the conversation would be very difficult otherwise. Even then, many editors feel that interspersing is inadvisable, because it breaks up existing comments. Whatever404 (talk) 22:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback - will do. Notevenonce (talk) 18:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Sock-puppet
[edit]This is a sock-puppet of Siebel.
Meth project COI
[edit]Please do not remove cited information from any article without an explanation. I think a conflict of interest may be encouraging you to remove negative information from the Montana Meth Project article. If you have questions about this then please contact me. Blue Rasberry 20:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 16:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
September 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Siebel Scholars may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 2010#1627 Doug May], [http://www.siebelscholars.com/conferences/2010#1628 Stephen Pacala], [[Arati Prabhakar], [[Andrew Revkin]], [[Jim Rogers]], [[Richard Sandor]], [[Daniel P. Schrag]], [
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siebel Scholars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lewis Lapham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 10:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Siebel Scholars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of notability or sufficient coverage
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Siebel Scholars for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siebel Scholars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.