User talk:Not so much lovers as friends

m:CheckUser_policy:The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to double-vote or to increase the apparent support for any given position).

So User:ST47 has demonstrated how rule of law works. This kind of self-report and then self-check and immediately silence victims have never seen before even in Chinese Wikipedia. @Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Mkdw, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, and Xeno: I am so sorry for disturbing you all but since ST47 just exercised the broadest discretion I have ever seen on multiple Wikipedia platforms, and because check user permission is granted by you all, I feel an urge to notify you. Thank you for listening. I just hope English Wikipedia could set an example for other Wikipedia around the world. Best regards. Not so much lovers as friends (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked your talk page access. You can email the Arbitration Committee if you would like us to hear your appeal. Please read the guide to appealing blocks first. – bradv🍁 14:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]