User talk:Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia only for trolling. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In what way is reminding people to Assume Good Faith and Be Civil "trolling"?

Decline reason:

Your contributions are not constructive. Sandstein 16:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please explain how reminding people to Assume Good Faith and Be Civil is "not constructive." I presume you can do so. Unless you are trying to troll me for some reason.

Decline reason:

I have read your request and reviewed your contribution history, but I was unable to find evidence that unblocking this account would be likely to make the encyclopedia better. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Not a Vet, Just a Pet Owner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request you actually discuss what it is you want. It appears my only "crime" is asking people to obey the known policies of Wikipedia, such as Assume Good Faith and Be Civil. If you believe that we should NOT remind incivil people to follow these, or you are assuming that I am NOT acting in good faith, then you are violating Wikipedia policy. It appears that the whole impetus of this, despite my desire to assume good faith on your part, is some bizarre desire to abuse others with your "extra buttons." This is hardly a fair, good faith, and equitable way to treat people.

Decline reason:

one post could be viewed as a reminder, trolling the user was harassment. Your edits were disruptive and not constructive to the community. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:14, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed by CheckUser as a sock puppet of User:Whether There's Weather Underground. Your talk page editing privileges have been revoked. –MuZemike 01:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]