User talk:NotJuggerNot

Hi, I am new to Wikipedia editing and am looking to contribute to this awesome encyclopedia and become an invaluable member of this community. My interests primarily lie in e-sports, history, business, and tech. I am currently in my learning phase and am pretty sure in the coming weeks, I will bring value to the Wikipedia community

February 2020

Please do not ever, ever "correct" direct quotations, even if they are full of actual errors. If it's how it was said, it's considered correct. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Audrey Assad, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chicken Ranch (Texas) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jessicapierce:. Thank you for correcting me. Regarding your comments on the quote marks, are you talking about the Contrapasso page?NotJuggerNot (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jessicapierce: I am really sorry, I was busy with my exams for the past 2 weeks. Even though I had replied to you a while back, I didn't really know how to ping you. I had to google it tbh. Again, thanks for correcting me. Can I ping you in the future if I need any help? There's definitely a lot that I'd love to learn. TIANotJuggerNot (talk) 20:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm sorry as well for this late reply - it's been a busy few weeks and my "reply-to" list is out of control. I'm looking back at the edits, and I think the Contrapasso one was fine - looks like you added the accurate translation.

The edit I was referring to above (and should have been more clear about!) was at Chicken Ranch (Texas). Under the "Closure" section, there's a quote by Zindler which you altered. No big deal, just something to avoid going forward.

Please do feel to touch base if you'd like help with anything. My Wikipedia expertise is patchy as I mostly do easy fixes and avoid the actual content creation, but I'm glad to hep if I can. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Pakistan Super League moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, History of the Pakistan Super League, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 22:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi NotJuggerNot! You created a thread called Looking for Recommendations at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of the Pakistan Super League has been accepted

History of the Pakistan Super League, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Pakistan Barnstar of National Merit
		Great work with creating History of the Pakistan Super League. This is an article I had given some thought of writing many years back, but never got around to it. Keep up the good efforts. Cheers! Mar4d (talk) 12:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks a lot for this. This certainly means a lot. Is there a way I can put this on my user page?NotJuggerNot (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome. Feel free to copy it over to your userpage, or let me know if you need help with anything. Mar4d (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Haitian Flag Day has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Haitian Flag Day. Thanks! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 04:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SpicyMilkBoy, thanks for your response. Can you please help me how I can fix this? The source you mentioned seems to be the most complete and relevant piece of information which is why I have tried to use it for the most part. I have read the instructions on how to fix it, can you give me some more practical tips? TIA NotJuggerNot (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have edited the changes that you highlighted. But you have suggested that there are other changes too. Would be highly obliged if you could help me identify them? ThanksNotJuggerNot (talk) 14:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work. I've accepted the draft because I don't think the paraphrasing is close enough to be an issue any more, though it could still use some copyediting. I think the issue arises from trying to follow the source too closely. Rather than repeating all of the information in the source, you should try to write a high-level summary of it (see WP:Summary style). It's often helpful to use additional sources, even if they contain the same information, so that you are not relying too heavily on the same source. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SpicyMilkBoy thanks for the review and your positive response. Is there a way I can seek help from the community regarding this? I know Teahouse, but there must be some other way too, I guess?NotJuggerNot (talk) 03:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I can't really think of anywhere besides the Teahouse. You can keep submitting articles through AfC, which ensures that an experienced editor will look at the article before it goes live, but some reviewers are not as thorough as others and might not catch close paraphrasing. There's a tool called Earwig that I use to check for copyright issues when reviewing articles; you can access it here. It compares the text of the article to the sources and displays them side by side, highlighting phrases that match. You might find this helpful for identifying close paraphrasing in your articles (though keep in mind that it looks for exact matches, so sentences where a few words are changed, while still considered close paraphrasing, won't be identified). SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haitian Flag Day has been accepted

Haitian Flag Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi NotJuggerNot! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Creating a a page as a fan, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, XO (record label), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 06:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear NotJuggerNot,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NotJuggerNot. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi NotJuggerNot,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haitian Flag Day has been accepted

Haitian Flag Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI NotJuggerNot,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]