Hello NotAWeasel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Merbabu
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. BhaiSaabtalk04:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hellow there. Please cut out the personal attacks. Your contributions history shows you've continued with the attacks on editors AFTER you edited out warnings which show you've at least read them (and also suggests you have some wikipedia experience). Please comment on content not editors. Perhaps this message is wasted on you if you have no intend on establishing yourself as a respected long term editor, but if you do want to make constructive contribution to "the project" you need to refine your style somewhat. [1], [2],
"POV forking"? - that's rather advanced for a new editor:[3],
if that is indeed so, there is a better way to handle it: [4]
The term POV Fork was used many times prior on the talk pages so I looked it up. It is absolutely correct to describe what Striver pulled as bad-faith POV forking. The presence of a high number of muslim editors all showing up at once even when they weren't talking on the other talk pages shows me they're engaging in a coordinated effort to control the article(s).
I have blocked you for making some rather ugly comments to other editors, as well as attacking other editor's religious beliefs in your edit summaries and page blankings. If you protest this block simply type {{unblock}} below this message.--MONGO11:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
"ugly comments" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And "page blankings"?? I never blanked a page, you liar.
Decline reason:
If you want to be part of the Wikipedia community, it means you have to abide by our rules especially Wikipedia:Civility. Your latest outburst below only demonstrates that you have anger management issues and that unblocking you now will only lead to further incivility towards others. -- Netsnipe ► 14:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am not a liar. this is a page blank by NotAWeasel: [9] :If you were mistaken/misunderstood that is fine (everyone makes mistakes - me too) but if you are intentionally lying that is not fine. (the fact that you may - or may not - have a point about the deficiency of voting doesn't mean you can blank pages) --Merbabu14:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia policy specifically says voting is NOT ALLOWED. And I did not "blank" the whole page, I merely removed an ILLEGAL VOTE. NotAWeasel14:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I love how MONGO's illegal block and bullshit lies are now being used to attack me. Really. Wonderful fucking place you've got here. Should we all just bow down to the pagan altar at Mecca and get it over with please?
I know it is easy to get hotheaded, especially when dealing with contentious editors like the Muslim Guild and other POV pushers. But your behavior crossed the line. I also am fully aware that they love to misconstrue every little thing as a personal attack or "breach of civility", but it doesn't do you much good to get mad about it.
Also: I'm not going to remove your comments from your own talk page (that would be incivil) but it might be nice of you to remove some of these comments that others see as inflammatory and perhaps post an apology for exploding like that. RunedChozo17:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Requested moves#15 November 2006, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ⇒bsnowball16:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Echoing Pat here. I agree with many of your edits or parts of your edits, but telling other users to "go pray to your pagan black box in mecca" is simply unaccepablt and unproductive. JoshuaZ04:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also keep in mind you will have a far better chance of convincing people to listen to you if you are calm and not insulting. JoshuaZ04:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.. Peace. --Nielswik(talk)06:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
